Difference between revisions of "Talk:2001-01-20-Time, Teaching"
(Created page with 'File:lighterstill.jpg See [http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2001-01-07-Patterns_Broken_By_Rebellion#Lesson_3 Session 4 of 2001-01-07-Patterns Broken By Rebellio...') |
m (Text replacement - "http://" to "https://") |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:lighterstill.jpg]] | [[File:lighterstill.jpg]] | ||
| − | See [ | + | See [https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2001-01-07-Patterns_Broken_By_Rebellion#Lesson_3 Session 4 of 2001-01-07-Patterns Broken By Rebellion] for partial duplicate of this record.--rdavis 14:24, 4 June 2013 (UTC) |
| + | |||
| + | '''Rob wrote:Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:09 PM''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | This is the lesson I mentioned below where a reference to the partial duplicate has been entered into its discussion page along with a corresponding note in the discussion page of the record of excerpts. If the complete lesson for the other three excerpts can be located, I will delete the record of 4 parts. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Gerdean wrote:Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:49 PM''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Explain it to me again. Is this full transcript now included in the Corpus Dilectum, or is it an appurtenance to a discussion about it? | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'd point out that the chop-chop transcript is labeled No. ID. whereas the visit from Onagar came through Spokane, WA. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Rob wrote:Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:24 PM''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | The "complete lesson" called [[2001-01-20-Time, Teaching]] : | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. contains a reference in its discussion page noting the fact that | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2. an excerpt is found in session 4 of [[2001-01-07-Patterns Broken By Rebellion]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3. this is cross referenced in the discussion page of 2001-01-07-Patterns Broken By Rebellion. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Using your phraseology, there are two records in the collection (corpus dilectum) each with an appurtenance called a discussion page making note of the relationship between the records for future purposes. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Gerdean wrote:Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:42 PM''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Even so, these lessons are coming from two different places and being accredited to one. | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''Rob wrote:Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:01 PM''' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Gerdean, | ||
| + | |||
| + | I will enter your comments in the respective discussion pages and await your recommendations for resolving this issue you raise. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Looking forward, | ||
| + | |||
| + | Rob | ||
Latest revision as of 23:56, 12 December 2020
See Session 4 of 2001-01-07-Patterns Broken By Rebellion for partial duplicate of this record.--rdavis 14:24, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Rob wrote:Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:09 PM
This is the lesson I mentioned below where a reference to the partial duplicate has been entered into its discussion page along with a corresponding note in the discussion page of the record of excerpts. If the complete lesson for the other three excerpts can be located, I will delete the record of 4 parts.
Gerdean wrote:Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 12:49 PM
Explain it to me again. Is this full transcript now included in the Corpus Dilectum, or is it an appurtenance to a discussion about it?
I'd point out that the chop-chop transcript is labeled No. ID. whereas the visit from Onagar came through Spokane, WA.
Rob wrote:Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:24 PM
The "complete lesson" called 2001-01-20-Time, Teaching :
1. contains a reference in its discussion page noting the fact that
2. an excerpt is found in session 4 of 2001-01-07-Patterns Broken By Rebellion.
3. this is cross referenced in the discussion page of 2001-01-07-Patterns Broken By Rebellion.
Using your phraseology, there are two records in the collection (corpus dilectum) each with an appurtenance called a discussion page making note of the relationship between the records for future purposes.
Gerdean wrote:Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:42 PM
Even so, these lessons are coming from two different places and being accredited to one.
Rob wrote:Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:01 PM
Gerdean,
I will enter your comments in the respective discussion pages and await your recommendations for resolving this issue you raise.
Looking forward,
Rob
