Changes

[[File:lighterstill.jpg]][[File:Temptation_and_fall_williamblake-1805.jpg|right|frame]]

[[File:lighterstill.jpg]][[File:Temptation_and_fall_williamblake-1805.jpg|right|frame]]

*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/14th_century 14th Century]

*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/14th_century 14th Century]

==Definitions==

==Definitions==

*1: the state of [[sin]] that according to [[Christian]] theology characterizes all [[human being]]s as a result of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fall_of_Man Adam's fall]

*1: the state of [[sin]] that according to [[Christian]] theology characterizes all [[human being]]s as a result of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fall_of_Man Adam's fall]

*2: a wrong of great [[magnitude]] <the original sin of [[slavery]]>  

*2: a wrong of great [[magnitude]] <the original sin of [[slavery]]>  

==Description==

==Description==

'''Original sin''', also called ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancestral_sin ancestral sin['', is, according to a [[Christian]] theological [[doctrine]], humanity's state of [[sin]] resulting from the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_of_man fall of man], stemming from [[the Default|Adam's rebellion in Eden]]. This condition has been characterized in many ways, ranging from something as insignificant as a slight deficiency, or a tendency toward [[sin]] yet without [[collective]] [[guilt]], referred to as a "sin nature", to something as drastic as total depravity or automatic guilt of all humans through collective guilt.

'''Original sin''', also called ''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancestral_sin ancestral sin['', is, according to a [[Christian]] theological [[doctrine]], humanity's state of [[sin]] resulting from the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_of_man fall of man], stemming from [[the Default|Adam's rebellion in Eden]]. This condition has been characterized in many ways, ranging from something as insignificant as a slight deficiency, or a tendency toward [[sin]] yet without [[collective]] [[guilt]], referred to as a "sin nature", to something as drastic as total depravity or automatic guilt of all humans through collective guilt.

The concept of ''original sin'' was first alluded to in the 2nd century by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irenaeus Irenaeus], Bishop of Lyons in his controversy (written in Greek) with certain dualist [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnosticism Gnostics]. Its scriptural [[foundation]] is based on the [[New Testament]] teaching of [[Paul, the Apostle]] ([https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=The_Letter_of_Paul_to_the_Romans#The_Letter_of_Paul_to_the_Romans.2C_V Romans 5:12-21] and [https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=1st_Letter_of_Paul_to_the_Corinthians#1st_Letter_of_Paul_to_the_Corinthians.2C_XV 1 Corinthians 15:22]), and [https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Book_of_Psalms#Psalm_51 Psalm 51:5]. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tertullian Tertullian], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyprian Cyprian], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambrose Ambrose] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambrosiaster Ambrosiaster] considered that mankind shares in Adam's sin, transmitted by human [[generation]]. Augustine's formulation of original sin was popular among [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protestant_Reformation Reformers], such as [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther Martin Luther] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Calvin John Calvin] who equated original sin with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concupiscence concupiscence], affirming that it persisted even after [[baptism]] and completely destroyed [[freedom]]. Within Roman Catholicism, the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jansenism Jansenist] movement, which the Church then declared [[heretical]], also maintained that original sin destroyed [[freedom]] of will.

The concept of ''original sin'' was first alluded to in the 2nd century by [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Irenaeus Irenaeus], Bishop of Lyons in his controversy (written in Greek) with certain dualist [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gnosticism Gnostics]. Its scriptural [[foundation]] is based on the [[New Testament]] teaching of [[Paul, the Apostle]] ([https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=The_Letter_of_Paul_to_the_Romans#The_Letter_of_Paul_to_the_Romans.2C_V Romans 5:12-21] and [https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=1st_Letter_of_Paul_to_the_Corinthians#1st_Letter_of_Paul_to_the_Corinthians.2C_XV 1 Corinthians 15:22]), and [https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Book_of_Psalms#Psalm_51 Psalm 51:5]. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tertullian Tertullian], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyprian Cyprian], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambrose Ambrose] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ambrosiaster Ambrosiaster] considered that mankind shares in Adam's sin, transmitted by human [[generation]]. Augustine's formulation of original sin was popular among [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Protestant_Reformation Reformers], such as [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_Luther Martin Luther] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Calvin John Calvin] who equated original sin with [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Concupiscence concupiscence], affirming that it persisted even after [[baptism]] and completely destroyed [[freedom]]. Within Roman Catholicism, the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jansenism Jansenist] movement, which the Church then declared [[heretical]], also maintained that original sin destroyed [[freedom]] of will.

The [[doctrine]] is not found in [[mainstream]] Judaism. Although there were some Jewish teachers in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talmudic Talmudic times] who believed that death was a punishment brought upon mankind on account of Adam's sin, that is not the dominant view in Judaism today.[5] The concept is also not found in Islam.[6][7] Depending on how it is defined, original sin is also rejected by some Christian theologies.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Original_sin]

The [[doctrine]] is not found in [[mainstream]] Judaism. Although there were some Jewish teachers in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talmudic Talmudic times] who believed that death was a punishment brought upon mankind on account of Adam's sin, that is not the dominant view in Judaism today.[5] The concept is also not found in Islam.[6][7] Depending on how it is defined, original sin is also rejected by some Christian theologies.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Original_sin]

==Quote==

==Quote==

[[89:4|89:4.5]] The earliest [[idea]] of the [[sacrifice]] was that of a neutrality assessment levied by [[ancestral]] spirits; only later did the idea of [[atonement]] develop. As man got away from the notion of the [[evolutionary]] [[origin]] of the [[race]], as the [[traditions]] of the days of the [[Planetary Prince]] and the [[sojourn]] of [[Adam]] filtered down through time, the [[concept]] of [[sin]] and of ''original sin'' became widespread, so that [[sacrifice]] for [[accidental]] and [[personal]] sin evolved into the [[doctrine]] of [[sacrifice]] for the [[atonement]] of racial sin. The [[atonement]] of the sacrifice was a blanket insurance device which covered even the resentment and [[jealousy]] of an [[unknown]] god.

[[89:4|89:4.5]] The earliest [[idea]] of the [[sacrifice]] was that of a neutrality assessment levied by [[ancestral]] spirits; only later did the idea of [[atonement]] develop. As man got away from the notion of the [[evolutionary]] [[origin]] of the [[race]], as the [[traditions]] of the days of the [[Planetary Prince]] and the [[sojourn]] of [[Adam]] filtered down through time, the [[concept]] of [[sin]] and of ''original sin'' became widespread, so that [[sacrifice]] for [[accidental]] and [[personal]] sin evolved into the [[doctrine]] of [[sacrifice]] for the [[atonement]] of racial sin. The [[atonement]] of the sacrifice was a blanket insurance device which covered even the resentment and [[jealousy]] of an [[unknown]] god.