Changes

59 bytes removed ,  22:25, 22 June 2011
Line 18: Line 18:     
The comparative study of cult practice is part of the [[discipline]]s of the [[anthropology]] of [[religion]] and the [[sociology]] of religion, two aspects of comparative religion. In the [[context]] of many religious organisations themselves, the study of cultic is called ''liturgy''.
 
The comparative study of cult practice is part of the [[discipline]]s of the [[anthropology]] of [[religion]] and the [[sociology]] of religion, two aspects of comparative religion. In the [[context]] of many religious organisations themselves, the study of cultic is called ''liturgy''.
 +
==Quote==
 +
True [[religion]] is a meaningful way of living dynamically face to face with the commonplace realities of everyday life. But if religion is to stimulate [[individual]] development of [[character]] and augment integration of [[personality]], it must not be standardized. If it is to stimulate evaluation of [[experience]] and serve as a [[value]]-lure, it must not be stereotyped. If religion is to promote supreme loyalties, it must not be [[formal]]ized.[http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Paper_99#99:4._TRANSITION_DIFFICULTIES]
   −
----
+
==See also==
 
+
*'''''[[Sect]]'''''
True [[religion]] is a meaningful way of living dynamically face to face with the commonplace realities of everyday life. But if religion is to stimulate [[individual]] development of [[character]] and augment integration of [[personality]], it must not be standardized. If it is to stimulate evaluation of [[experience]] and serve as a [[value]]-lure, it must not be stereotyped. If religion is to promote supreme loyalties, it must not be [[formal]]ized.[http://mercy.urantia.org/cgi-bin/webglimpse/mfs/usr/local/www/data/papers?link=http://mercy.urantia.org/papers/paper99.html&file=/usr/local/www/data/papers/paper99.html&line=84#mfs]