Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| ==Origin== | | ==Origin== |
| [https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=English#ca._1100-1500_.09THE_MIDDLE_ENGLISH_PERIOD Middle English] ''stricte'', from [[Latin]] ''strictus'', from past participle of ''stringere'' to bind tight | | [https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=English#ca._1100-1500_.09THE_MIDDLE_ENGLISH_PERIOD Middle English] ''stricte'', from [[Latin]] ''strictus'', from past participle of ''stringere'' to bind tight |
− | *[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/15th_century 15th Century] | + | *[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/15th_century 15th Century] |
| ==Definitions== | | ==Definitions== |
| *1archaic: a : tight, close; also : [[intimate]] | | *1archaic: a : tight, close; also : [[intimate]] |
Line 16: |
Line 16: |
| In [[mathematical]] [[writing]], the adjective '''strict''' is used to [[modify]] technical terms which have multiple [[meanings]]. It indicates that the exclusive meaning of the term is to be understood. (More [[formally]], one could say that this is the meaning which implies the other meanings.) The opposite is non-strict. This is often implicit but can be put explicitly for [[clarity]]. In some [[contexts]] the word "proper" is used as a mathematical synonym for "strict". | | In [[mathematical]] [[writing]], the adjective '''strict''' is used to [[modify]] technical terms which have multiple [[meanings]]. It indicates that the exclusive meaning of the term is to be understood. (More [[formally]], one could say that this is the meaning which implies the other meanings.) The opposite is non-strict. This is often implicit but can be put explicitly for [[clarity]]. In some [[contexts]] the word "proper" is used as a mathematical synonym for "strict". |
| | | |
− | This term is commonly used in the [[context]] of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inequality_(mathematics) inequalities] — the phrase "strictly less than" means "less than and not equal to" (likewise "strictly greater than" means "greater than and not equal to"). More generally a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partially_ordered_set#Strict_and_non-strict_partial_orders strict partial order], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_total_order strict total order] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_weak_ordering strict weak order] exclude [[equality]] and equivalence. | + | This term is commonly used in the [[context]] of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inequality_(mathematics) inequalities] — the phrase "strictly less than" means "less than and not equal to" (likewise "strictly greater than" means "greater than and not equal to"). More generally a [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partially_ordered_set#Strict_and_non-strict_partial_orders strict partial order], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_total_order strict total order] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strict_weak_ordering strict weak order] exclude [[equality]] and equivalence. |
| | | |
| A related use occurs when [[comparing]] numbers to zero — "strictly positive" and "strictly negative" mean "positive and not equal to zero" and "negative and not equal to zero", respectively. Also, in the context of functions, the adverb "strictly " is used to modify the terms "monotonic", "increasing", and "decreasing". | | A related use occurs when [[comparing]] numbers to zero — "strictly positive" and "strictly negative" mean "positive and not equal to zero" and "negative and not equal to zero", respectively. Also, in the context of functions, the adverb "strictly " is used to modify the terms "monotonic", "increasing", and "decreasing". |
Line 24: |
Line 24: |
| Using such [[terminology]] helps avoid possible [[ambiguity]] and [[confusion]]. For instance, upon reading the phrase "x is positive", it is not immediately clear whether x = 0 is possible, since some [[authors]] might use the term positive loosely, and mean that x is not less than zero. Therefore, it is prudent to write "x is strictly positive" for x>0 and "x is non-negative" for x≥0. (A precise term like non-negative is never used with the word negative in the wide, loose sense that includes zero.) | | Using such [[terminology]] helps avoid possible [[ambiguity]] and [[confusion]]. For instance, upon reading the phrase "x is positive", it is not immediately clear whether x = 0 is possible, since some [[authors]] might use the term positive loosely, and mean that x is not less than zero. Therefore, it is prudent to write "x is strictly positive" for x>0 and "x is non-negative" for x≥0. (A precise term like non-negative is never used with the word negative in the wide, loose sense that includes zero.) |
| | | |
− | The word "proper" is often used in the same way as "strict." For example, a "[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proper_subset proper subset]" of a set S is a subset that is not equal to S itself, and a "[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proper_class proper class]" is a class which is not also a set. | + | The word "proper" is often used in the same way as "strict." For example, a "[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proper_subset proper subset]" of a set S is a subset that is not equal to S itself, and a "[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proper_class proper class]" is a class which is not also a set. |
| | | |
| [[Category: General Reference]] | | [[Category: General Reference]] |
| [[Category: Mathematics]] | | [[Category: Mathematics]] |