Changes

Line 83: Line 83:  
Student: Yes, I’d be happy to. The question I have here pertains to the person through which the messages are being given to these groups. I am [[wonder]]ing how much the particular person you have chosen to work with, has an influence on the message?
 
Student: Yes, I’d be happy to. The question I have here pertains to the person through which the messages are being given to these groups. I am [[wonder]]ing how much the particular person you have chosen to work with, has an influence on the message?
   −
MONJORONSON: The individual through whom the message comes has a particular and peculiar influence upon the message. It is as with any database that you work with, you can only get out what you have put in, or through rearranging the [[material]] that is inside it. That is inventiveness using different [[words]] and different combinations, but nonetheless, what comes through the [[individual]], is truly filtered. As we prefer to deal with "[[conscious]]" channels, rather than "[[trance]]" channels, this requires us to work consciously with the individual. This limits us tremendously when the [[belief]] systems and possibilities and the [[imagination]] of the individual is limited.
+
MONJORONSON: The individual through whom the message comes has a particular and peculiar influence upon the message. It is as with any database that you work with, you can only get out what you have put in, or through rearranging the [[material]] that is inside it. That is inventiveness using different [[words]] and different combinations, but nonetheless, what comes through the [[individual]], is truly filtered. As we prefer to deal with "[[Consciousness|conscious]]" channels, rather than "[[trance]]" channels, this requires us to work consciously with the individual. This limits us tremendously when the [[belief]] systems and possibilities and the [[imagination]] of the individual is limited.
    
If the individual does not have multi-[[vision]]ary auditory, visual, and other capabilities, this limits our capacity to convey [[concepts]], and [[meaning]] ("[[heart]] [[value]]") to individuals. If there is no "heart" within the individuals, no compassion, no sympathy, no empathy, no caring, then this limits what will come through the individual. There are many nuances to that, though, some of which are these: that though the individual may be deficit in these areas, they may nonetheless believe at the core of their [[being]] that they are a loved and worthy individual, that they need love and compassion—as do others—and so we can tap into that, and use that core energy to affect what comes through that individual.
 
If the individual does not have multi-[[vision]]ary auditory, visual, and other capabilities, this limits our capacity to convey [[concepts]], and [[meaning]] ("[[heart]] [[value]]") to individuals. If there is no "heart" within the individuals, no compassion, no sympathy, no empathy, no caring, then this limits what will come through the individual. There are many nuances to that, though, some of which are these: that though the individual may be deficit in these areas, they may nonetheless believe at the core of their [[being]] that they are a loved and worthy individual, that they need love and compassion—as do others—and so we can tap into that, and use that core energy to affect what comes through that individual.
   −
Ideas of technology, of inventiveness, of other worldly capacities, are truly limited by to the visionary capacity of the individual. There are many realms, which we are limited to convey through this one to you, yet we are pleased with what does come through, to some extent. It is a humbling [[experience]] for all, regarding this process, both for us knowing that you are an experimental planet, [and] your [[biology]] dictates what your heredity has been and will be, it dictates the capacity of the [[mind]] development, and that it is limited. Your two-part mind surely does limit the capacity in which we can convey concepts of [[justice]], [[mercy]] and even-handedness, of weighing the best outcome, especially when your personal interests are jeopardized. This is not going to be solved soon, but maybe will be in future [[eon]]s of this world. It is not a concern of yours or ours, at the moment.
+
Ideas of technology, of inventiveness, of other worldly capacities, are truly limited by to the visionary capacity of the individual. There are many realms, which we are limited to convey through this one to you, yet we are pleased with what does come through, to some extent. It is a humbling [[experience]] for all, regarding this process, both for us knowing that you are an experimental planet, [and] your [[biology]] dictates what your heredity has been and will be, it dictates the capacity of the [[mind]] development, and that it is limited. Your two-part mind surely does limit the capacity in which we can convey concepts of [[justice]], [[mercy]] and even-handedness, of weighing the best outcome, especially when your personal interests are jeopardized. This is not going to be solved soon, but maybe will be in future [[aeon]]s of this world. It is not a concern of yours or ours, at the moment.
    
[Note to Readers: Monjoronson continues his answer to this question after the interjected question immediately below. To continue, begin at, "To return to the predicament of the individual…"]
 
[Note to Readers: Monjoronson continues his answer to this question after the interjected question immediately below. To continue, begin at, "To return to the predicament of the individual…"]