Difference between revisions of "ACIM Manual for Teachers - Section 24"

From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
Line 4: Line 4:
  
  
In the ultimate sense, reincarnation is impossible. There is no past or future,
+
In the [[ultimate]] sense, [[reincarnation]] is impossible. There is no [[past]] or [[future]],
and the idea of birth into a body has no meaning either once or many times.
+
and the idea of [[birth]] into a [[body]] has no [[meaning]] either once or many times.
 
Reincarnation cannot, then, be true in any real sense. Our only question
 
Reincarnation cannot, then, be true in any real sense. Our only question
 
should be, "Is the concept helpful?" And that depends, of course, on what it
 
should be, "Is the concept helpful?" And that depends, of course, on what it
is used for. If it is used to strengthen the recognition of the eternal nature of
+
is used for. If it is used to [[strengthen]] the recognition of the [[eternal]] nature of
life, it is helpful indeed. Is any other question about it really useful in
+
[[life]], it is helpful indeed. Is any other question about it really useful in
lighting up the way? Like many other beliefs, it can be bitterly misused. At
+
lighting up the way? Like many other [[beliefs]], it can be bitterly misused. At
least, such misuse offers preoccupation and perhaps pride in the past. At
+
least, such misuse offers preoccupation and perhaps [[pride]] in the past. At
worst, it induces inertia in the present. In between, many kinds of folly are
+
worst, it induces [[inertia]] in the present. In between, many kinds of [[folly]] are
 
possible.
 
possible.
  
Reincarnation would not, under any circumstances, be the problem to be
+
[[Reincarnation]] would not, under any circumstances, be the [[problem]] to be
dealt with ''now''. If it were responsible for some of the difficulties the
+
dealt with ''[[now]]''. If it were [[responsible]] for some of the difficulties the
individual faces now, his task would still be only to escape from them now.
+
[[individual]] faces now, his task would still be only to [[escape]] from them now.
If he is laying the groundwork for a future life, he can still work out his
+
If he is laying the groundwork for a [[future]] life, he can still work out his
salvation only now. To some, there may be comfort in the concept, and if it
+
[[salvation]] only now. To some, there may be [[comfort]] in the concept, and if it
heartens them its value is self-evident. It is certain, however, that the way to
+
heartens them its [[value]] is self-evident. It is certain, however, that the way to
salvation can be found by those who believe in reincarnation and by those
+
[[salvation]] can be found by those who believe in reincarnation and by those
 
who do not. The idea cannot, therefore, be regarded as essential to the
 
who do not. The idea cannot, therefore, be regarded as essential to the
curriculum. There is always some risk in seeing the present in terms of the
+
[[curriculum]]. There is always some [[risk]] in seeing the present in terms of the
past. There is always some good in any thought which strengthens the idea
+
past. There is always some [[good]] in any thought which [[strengthens]] the idea
that life and the body are not the same.
+
that life and the [[body]] are not the same.
  
For our purposes, it would not be helpful to take any definite stand on  
+
For our [[purposes]], it would not be helpful to take any definite stand on  
reincarnation. A teacher of God should be as helpful to those who believe in
+
[[reincarnation]]. A [[teacher of God]] should be as helpful to those who [[believe]] in
 
it as to those who do not. If a definite stand were required of him, it would
 
it as to those who do not. If a definite stand were required of him, it would
merely limit his usefulness, as well as his own decision making. Our course
+
merely [[limit]] his usefulness, as well as his own [[decision]] making. [[ACIM|Our course]]
is not concerned with any concept that is not acceptable to anyone,
+
is not concerned with any concept that is not [[acceptable]] to anyone,
regardless of his formal beliefs. His ego will be enough for him to cope
+
regardless of his formal [[beliefs]]. His [[ego]] will be enough for him to cope
with, and it is not the part of wisdom to add sectarian controversies to his
+
with, and it is not the part of [[wisdom]] to add [[sectarian]] [[controversies]] to his
burdens. Nor would there be an advantage in his premature acceptance of
+
burdens. Nor would there be an [[advantage]] in his premature acceptance of
the course merely because it advocates a long-held belief of his own.
+
the course merely because it advocates a long-held [[belief]] of his own.
  
It cannot be too strongly emphasized that this course aims at a complete
+
It cannot be too strongly emphasized that [[ACIM|this course]] aims at a complete
reversal of thought. When this is finally accomplished, issues such as the
+
[[reversal]] of [[thought]]. When this is finally accomplished, issues such as the
validity of reincarnation become meaningless. Until then, they are likely to
+
validity of [[reincarnation]] become meaningless. Until then, they are likely to
be merely controversial. The teacher of God is, therefore, wise to step away
+
be merely controversial. The [[teacher of God]] is, therefore, [[wise]] to step away
from all such questions, for he has much to teach and learn apart from them.
+
from all such [[questions]], for he has much to teach and learn apart from them.
He should both learn and teach that theoretical issues but waste time,
+
He should both learn and teach that [[theoretical]] issues but waste time,
draining it away from its appointed purpose. If there are aspects to any
+
draining it away from its appointed [[purpose]]. If there are aspects to any
concept or belief that will be helpful, he will be told about it. He will also
+
concept or [[belief]] that will be helpful, he will be told about it. He will also
 
be told how to use it. What more need he know?
 
be told how to use it. What more need he know?
  
Does this mean that the teacher of God should not believe in reincarnation
+
Does this mean that the [[teacher of God]] should not [[believe]] in [[reincarnation]]
himself, or discuss it with others who do? The answer is, certainly not! If he
+
himself, or [[discuss]] it with others who do? The answer is, certainly not! If he
does believe in reincarnation, it would be a mistake for him to renounce the
+
does believe in reincarnation, it would be a [[mistake]] for him to [[renounce]] the
belief unless his internal Teacher so advised. And this is most unlikely. He
+
[[belief]] unless his internal Teacher so advised. And this is most unlikely. He
 
might be advised that he is misusing the belief in some way that is
 
might be advised that he is misusing the belief in some way that is
detrimental to his pupil's advance or his own. Reinterpretation would then
+
detrimental to his [[pupil]]'s advance or his own. Reinterpretation would then
be recommended, because it is necessary. All that must be recognized,
+
be recommended, because it is [[necessary]]. All that must be recognized,
however, is that birth was not the beginning, and death is not the end. Yet
+
however, is that [[birth]] was not the beginning, and [[death]] is not the end. Yet
even this much is not required of the beginner. He need merely accept the
+
even this much is not required of the beginner. He need merely [[accept]] the
idea that what he knows is not necessarily all there is to learn. His journey
+
idea that what he knows is not necessarily all there is to learn. His [[journey]]
 
has begun.
 
has begun.
  
The emphasis of this course always remains the same;--it is at this moment
+
The emphasis of [[ACIM|this course]] always remains the same;--it is at this moment
that complete salvation is offered you, and it is at this moment that you can
+
that complete [[salvation]] is offered you, and it is at this moment that you can
accept it. This is still your one responsibility. Atonement might be equated
+
[[accept]] it. This is still your one [[responsibility]]. [[Atonement]] might be equated
with total escape from the past and total lack of interest in the future.
+
with total [[escape]] from the [[past]] and total lack of interest in the [[future]].
Heaven is here. There is nowhere else. Heaven is now. There is no other
+
[[Heaven]] is here. There is nowhere else. Heaven is now. There is no other
time. No teaching that does not lead to this is of concern to God's teachers.
+
[[time]]. No teaching that does not lead to this is of concern to God's teachers.
All beliefs will point to this if properly interpreted. In this sense, it can be
+
All [[beliefs]] will point to this if properly [[interpreted]]. In this sense, it can be
said that their truth lies in their usefulness. All beliefs that lead to progress
+
said that their [[truth]] lies in their usefulness. All [[beliefs]] that lead to [[progress]]
should be honored. This is the sole criterion this course requires. No more
+
should be honored. This is the sole criterion [[ACIM|this course]] requires. No more
than this is necessary.
+
than this is [[necessary]].
  
 
[[Category:Manual for Teachers]]
 
[[Category:Manual for Teachers]]
 
[[Category: Reincarnation]]
 
[[Category: Reincarnation]]
 +
[[Category: Belief]]

Latest revision as of 18:05, 9 October 2015

Lighterstill.jpg

Acim small.jpg
Is Reincarnation So?


In the ultimate sense, reincarnation is impossible. There is no past or future, and the idea of birth into a body has no meaning either once or many times. Reincarnation cannot, then, be true in any real sense. Our only question should be, "Is the concept helpful?" And that depends, of course, on what it is used for. If it is used to strengthen the recognition of the eternal nature of life, it is helpful indeed. Is any other question about it really useful in lighting up the way? Like many other beliefs, it can be bitterly misused. At least, such misuse offers preoccupation and perhaps pride in the past. At worst, it induces inertia in the present. In between, many kinds of folly are possible.

Reincarnation would not, under any circumstances, be the problem to be dealt with now. If it were responsible for some of the difficulties the individual faces now, his task would still be only to escape from them now. If he is laying the groundwork for a future life, he can still work out his salvation only now. To some, there may be comfort in the concept, and if it heartens them its value is self-evident. It is certain, however, that the way to salvation can be found by those who believe in reincarnation and by those who do not. The idea cannot, therefore, be regarded as essential to the curriculum. There is always some risk in seeing the present in terms of the past. There is always some good in any thought which strengthens the idea that life and the body are not the same.

For our purposes, it would not be helpful to take any definite stand on reincarnation. A teacher of God should be as helpful to those who believe in it as to those who do not. If a definite stand were required of him, it would merely limit his usefulness, as well as his own decision making. Our course is not concerned with any concept that is not acceptable to anyone, regardless of his formal beliefs. His ego will be enough for him to cope with, and it is not the part of wisdom to add sectarian controversies to his burdens. Nor would there be an advantage in his premature acceptance of the course merely because it advocates a long-held belief of his own.

It cannot be too strongly emphasized that this course aims at a complete reversal of thought. When this is finally accomplished, issues such as the validity of reincarnation become meaningless. Until then, they are likely to be merely controversial. The teacher of God is, therefore, wise to step away from all such questions, for he has much to teach and learn apart from them. He should both learn and teach that theoretical issues but waste time, draining it away from its appointed purpose. If there are aspects to any concept or belief that will be helpful, he will be told about it. He will also be told how to use it. What more need he know?

Does this mean that the teacher of God should not believe in reincarnation himself, or discuss it with others who do? The answer is, certainly not! If he does believe in reincarnation, it would be a mistake for him to renounce the belief unless his internal Teacher so advised. And this is most unlikely. He might be advised that he is misusing the belief in some way that is detrimental to his pupil's advance or his own. Reinterpretation would then be recommended, because it is necessary. All that must be recognized, however, is that birth was not the beginning, and death is not the end. Yet even this much is not required of the beginner. He need merely accept the idea that what he knows is not necessarily all there is to learn. His journey has begun.

The emphasis of this course always remains the same;--it is at this moment that complete salvation is offered you, and it is at this moment that you can accept it. This is still your one responsibility. Atonement might be equated with total escape from the past and total lack of interest in the future. Heaven is here. There is nowhere else. Heaven is now. There is no other time. No teaching that does not lead to this is of concern to God's teachers. All beliefs will point to this if properly interpreted. In this sense, it can be said that their truth lies in their usefulness. All beliefs that lead to progress should be honored. This is the sole criterion this course requires. No more than this is necessary.