Difference between revisions of "Greatness"

From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Redirected page to Nobility)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
#REDIRECT [[Nobility]]
+
[[File:lighterstill.jpg]][[Image:Logos650.jpg|center|frame]]
 +
 
 +
==Origin==
 +
[http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=English#ca._1100-1500_.09THE_MIDDLE_ENGLISH_PERIOD Middle English] ''grete'', from [http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=English#ca._600-1100.09THE_OLD_ENGLISH.2C_OR_ANGLO-SAXON_PERIOD Old English] ''grēat''; akin to Old High German ''grōz'' large
 +
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/12th_century before 12th Century]
 +
==Definitions==
 +
*1a : notably large in size : huge
 +
:b : of a kind characterized by [[relative]] largeness —used in [[plant]] and [[animal]] [[names]]
 +
:c : elaborate, ample <great detail>
 +
*2a : large in [[number]] or [[measure]] : numerous <great multitudes>
 +
:b : predominant <the great [[majority]]>
 +
*3: remarkable in [[magnitude]], [[degree]], or effectiveness <great bloodshed>
 +
*4: full of [[emotion]] <great with [[anger]]>
 +
*5a : eminent, distinguished <a great [[poet]]>
 +
:b : chief or preeminent over others —often used in titles <Lord Great Chamberlain>
 +
:c : [[aristocratic]], grand <great ladies>
 +
*6: long continued <a great while>
 +
*7: principal, main <a reception in the great hall>
 +
*8: more remote in a [[family]] relationship by a single [[generation]] than a specified relative <great-grandfather>
 +
*9: markedly superior in [[character]] or quality; especially : [[noble]] <great of [[soul]]>
 +
*10a : remarkably [[skilled]] <great at tennis>
 +
:b : marked by [[enthusiasm]] : keen <great on [[science fiction]]>
 +
==Description==
 +
Since the publication of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Galton Francis Galton]’s ''Hereditary Genius'' in 1869, and especially with the [[accelerated]] development of intelligence tests in the early 1900s, there has been a vast amount of [[social scientific]] [[research]] published relative to the question of ‘'''greatness'''’. Much of this research doesn’t actually use the term ‘great’ in [[describing]] itself, preferring terms such as ‘eminence’, ‘[[genius]]’, ‘exceptional achievement’, etc.  Historically the major [[intellectual]] battles over this [[topic]] have focused around the questions of ‘[[nature]] vs [[nurture]]’ or ‘[[person]] vs [[context]]’. Today the importance of both [[dimensions]] is accepted by all, but disagreements over the [[relative]] importance of each are still [[reflected]] in variations in [[research]] emphases.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greatness]
 +
 
 +
[[Category: Philosophy]]
 +
[[Category: Psychology]]

Revision as of 18:33, 16 March 2012

Lighterstill.jpg

Logos650.jpg

Origin

Middle English grete, from Old English grēat; akin to Old High German grōz large

Definitions

  • 1a : notably large in size : huge
b : of a kind characterized by relative largeness —used in plant and animal names
c : elaborate, ample <great detail>
b : predominant <the great majority>
b : chief or preeminent over others —often used in titles <Lord Great Chamberlain>
c : aristocratic, grand <great ladies>
  • 6: long continued <a great while>
  • 7: principal, main <a reception in the great hall>
  • 8: more remote in a family relationship by a single generation than a specified relative <great-grandfather>
  • 9: markedly superior in character or quality; especially : noble <great of soul>
  • 10a : remarkably skilled <great at tennis>
b : marked by enthusiasm : keen <great on science fiction>

Description

Since the publication of Francis Galton’s Hereditary Genius in 1869, and especially with the accelerated development of intelligence tests in the early 1900s, there has been a vast amount of social scientific research published relative to the question of ‘greatness’. Much of this research doesn’t actually use the term ‘great’ in describing itself, preferring terms such as ‘eminence’, ‘genius’, ‘exceptional achievement’, etc. Historically the major intellectual battles over this topic have focused around the questions of ‘nature vs nurture’ or ‘person vs context’. Today the importance of both dimensions is accepted by all, but disagreements over the relative importance of each are still reflected in variations in research emphases.[1]