Difference between revisions of "Homogeneous"

From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with 'File:lighterstill.jpgright|frame ==Etymology== Medieval Latin homogeneus, homogenus, from Greek homogenēs, from hom- + genos kind ...')
 
m (Text replacement - "http://" to "https://")
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
==Etymology==
 
==Etymology==
 
Medieval [[Latin]] homogeneus, homogenus, from [[Greek]] homogenēs, from hom- + genos kind  
 
Medieval [[Latin]] homogeneus, homogenus, from [[Greek]] homogenēs, from hom- + genos kind  
*Date: [http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/17th_Century 1641]
+
*Date: [https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/17th_Century 1641]
 
==Definitions==
 
==Definitions==
 
*1 : of the same or a similar kind or [[nature]]
 
*1 : of the same or a similar kind or [[nature]]
Line 19: Line 19:
 
* ''Species migration''
 
* ''Species migration''
  
[[Species]] naturally migrate and expand their ranges, utilising new [[habitats]] and [[resources]], e.g. the cattle egret. These natural invasions, an incursion in the [[absence]] of anthropogenic influences, occur “when an intervening barrier is removed, or through the development of biotic or abiotic transportation [[mechanisms]], able to overcome the barrier in question”. Introductions, or human-mediated invasions, have in the [http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/20th_Century last century] become more frequent. It is estimated that on an average day more than 3,000 species alone are in transit aboard ocean-going vessels.
+
[[Species]] naturally migrate and expand their ranges, utilising new [[habitats]] and [[resources]], e.g. the cattle egret. These natural invasions, an incursion in the [[absence]] of anthropogenic influences, occur “when an intervening barrier is removed, or through the development of biotic or abiotic transportation [[mechanisms]], able to overcome the barrier in question”. Introductions, or human-mediated invasions, have in the [https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/20th_Century last century] become more frequent. It is estimated that on an average day more than 3,000 species alone are in transit aboard ocean-going vessels.
  
 
Using species richness as the [[unit]] for which to assess global homogeneity, it appears that anthropogenic [[assistance]] in [[alien]] [[species]] establishment has done much to reduce the [[number]] of endemic species, especially on remote islands. Some ‘species-poor’ habitats may, however, benefit in [[diversity]] if an invader can occupy an empty niche. Arguably, that [[environment]] becomes more diverse, equally it has also “become more similar to the rest of the world”, though ecological [[interactions]] between the invaders and the natives are likely to be [[unique]]. Indeed, many species are so well naturalised that they are considered native, yet they were originally introduced; with the best examples probably being the [[Roman]] and [[Norman]] introduction of the hare and the rabbit respectively to Britain.
 
Using species richness as the [[unit]] for which to assess global homogeneity, it appears that anthropogenic [[assistance]] in [[alien]] [[species]] establishment has done much to reduce the [[number]] of endemic species, especially on remote islands. Some ‘species-poor’ habitats may, however, benefit in [[diversity]] if an invader can occupy an empty niche. Arguably, that [[environment]] becomes more diverse, equally it has also “become more similar to the rest of the world”, though ecological [[interactions]] between the invaders and the natives are likely to be [[unique]]. Indeed, many species are so well naturalised that they are considered native, yet they were originally introduced; with the best examples probably being the [[Roman]] and [[Norman]] introduction of the hare and the rabbit respectively to Britain.
  
Introduction of non-endemic species and subsequent eradication of species can happen remarkably fast; [[evolutionary]] tempo is, however, slow and “succession of rapid [[change]] [will] result in a great impoverishment”. That impoverishment will indeed equate in a world that is more similar, as there will simply be less species to formulate [[difference]]. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homogeneity_%28ecology%29]
+
Introduction of non-endemic species and subsequent eradication of species can happen remarkably fast; [[evolutionary]] tempo is, however, slow and “succession of rapid [[change]] [will] result in a great impoverishment”. That impoverishment will indeed equate in a world that is more similar, as there will simply be less species to formulate [[difference]]. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homogeneity_%28ecology%29]
  
 
[[Category: Ecology]]
 
[[Category: Ecology]]
 
[[Category: General Reference]]
 
[[Category: General Reference]]

Latest revision as of 00:15, 13 December 2020

Lighterstill.jpg

Frost-homogenity200.jpg

Etymology

Medieval Latin homogeneus, homogenus, from Greek homogenēs, from hom- + genos kind

Definitions

  • 1 : of the same or a similar kind or nature
  • 2 : of uniform structure or composition throughout <a culturally homogeneous neighborhood>
  • 3 : having the property that if each variable is replaced by a constant times that variable the constant can be factored out : having each term of the same degree if all variables are considered <a homogeneous equation>

Description

In ecological terms it can also be expressed as a lack of, or reduction in biodiversity. Species richness is the fundamental unit in which to assess the homogeneity of an environment. Therefore, any reduction in species richness, especially endemic species, could be argued as advocating the production of a homogenous environment.

  • Monocultures

Homogeneity in agriculture and forestry; in particular, industrial agriculture and forestry use a limited number of species. About 7,000 plants (2.6% of all plant species) have been collected or cultivated for human consumption. Of these, a mere 200 have been domesticated and only a dozen contribute about 75% of the global intake of plant-derived calories.

95% of world consumption of protein derives from a few domesticated species, ie poultry, cattle and pigs. There are about 1,000 commercial fish species, but in aquaculture fewer than 10 species dominate global production. Human food production therefore rests on the tips of pyramids of biodiversity, leaving the majority of species not utilised and not domesticated.

  • Species migration

Species naturally migrate and expand their ranges, utilising new habitats and resources, e.g. the cattle egret. These natural invasions, an incursion in the absence of anthropogenic influences, occur “when an intervening barrier is removed, or through the development of biotic or abiotic transportation mechanisms, able to overcome the barrier in question”. Introductions, or human-mediated invasions, have in the last century become more frequent. It is estimated that on an average day more than 3,000 species alone are in transit aboard ocean-going vessels.

Using species richness as the unit for which to assess global homogeneity, it appears that anthropogenic assistance in alien species establishment has done much to reduce the number of endemic species, especially on remote islands. Some ‘species-poor’ habitats may, however, benefit in diversity if an invader can occupy an empty niche. Arguably, that environment becomes more diverse, equally it has also “become more similar to the rest of the world”, though ecological interactions between the invaders and the natives are likely to be unique. Indeed, many species are so well naturalised that they are considered native, yet they were originally introduced; with the best examples probably being the Roman and Norman introduction of the hare and the rabbit respectively to Britain.

Introduction of non-endemic species and subsequent eradication of species can happen remarkably fast; evolutionary tempo is, however, slow and “succession of rapid change [will] result in a great impoverishment”. That impoverishment will indeed equate in a world that is more similar, as there will simply be less species to formulate difference. [1]