Changes

From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to search
43 bytes added ,  17:41, 2 October 2010
Line 44: Line 44:  
*First, is there an alternative to dishonesty? If there is an honest way to avoid the unwanted harm or produce the desired benefit, it is preferable.  
 
*First, is there an alternative to dishonesty? If there is an honest way to avoid the unwanted harm or produce the desired benefit, it is preferable.  
 
*Second, what are the moral reasons for dishonesty? [[Clarity]] about the principles that might justify dishonesty is crucial because then they can be weighed against the benefits of honesty.  
 
*Second, what are the moral reasons for dishonesty? [[Clarity]] about the principles that might justify dishonesty is crucial because then they can be weighed against the benefits of honesty.  
*Finally, will the dishonest act pass the test of publicity? Lies are often motivated by self-interest that will not be persuasive to other interested parties such as employees, stockholders, the press, or regulatory agencies. [[Individuals]] and companies that apply these tests may, indeed, conclude that honesty is the best policy.  
+
*Finally, will the dishonest act pass the test of publicity? Lies are often motivated by self-interest that will not be persuasive to other interested parties such as employees, stockholders, the press, or regulatory agencies. [[Individuals]] and companies that apply these tests may, indeed, conclude that honesty is the best policy.
 +
==See also==
 +
*'''''[[Transparency]]'''''==
 +
 
 
==Further Readings==
 
==Further Readings==
 
*Bok, S. (1999). Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. New York: Random House.
 
*Bok, S. (1999). Lying: Moral choice in public and private life. New York: Random House.

Navigation menu