Changes

[[Image:lighterstill.jpg]][[Image:Judgement.jpg|right|frame]]

[[Image:lighterstill.jpg]][[Image:Judgement.jpg|right|frame]]

The term '''judgment''' (American English) or '''judgement''' (British English) generally refers to the considered evaluation of evidence in the formation of [[decision|making a decision]]. The term has three distinct uses:

The term '''judgment''' (American English) or '''judgement''' (British English) generally refers to the considered evaluation of evidence in the formation of [[decision|making a decision]]. The term has three distinct uses:

* Informal and [[psychology]] - used in reference to a qualitative of [[cognitive]] faculties and adjudicational capabilities of particular [[individuals]], typically called '''[[wisdom]]''' or '''[[discernment]]'''.

* Informal and [[psychology]] - used in reference to a qualitative of [[cognitive]] faculties and adjudicational capabilities of particular [[individuals]], typically called '''[[wisdom]]''' or discernment.

* Legal - used in the [[context]] of [[law|legal]] trial, to refer to a final finding, statement, or ruling, based on a considered weighing of evidence, called "'''[[adjudication]].'''"

* Legal - used in the [[context]] of [[law|legal]] trial, to refer to a final finding, statement, or ruling, based on a considered weighing of evidence, called adjudication.

* Religious - used in the [[concept]] of [[salvation]] to refer to the [[divine]] judgment in determining reward or punishment for each and all [[human being]]s.

* Religious - used in the [[concept]] of [[salvation]] to refer to the [[divine]] judgment in determining reward or punishment for each and all [[human being]]s.

== Background ==

== Background ==

Without a rigorous [[analysis]], a rigid set of criteria for all forms of judgment, this often results in unnecessary restrictions to judgment methodologies, excluding what may otherwise be considered legitimate judgments.  For [[analogy|analogous]] difficulties in [[science]] and the scientific method see the entry on the [[scientific method]].

Without a rigorous [[analysis]], a rigid set of criteria for all forms of judgment, this often results in unnecessary restrictions to judgment methodologies, excluding what may otherwise be considered legitimate judgments.  For [[analogy|analogous]] difficulties in [[science]] and the scientific method see the entry on the [[scientific method]].

From the criteria mentioned above, we could judge that "It is raining" if there are raindrops hitting the window, if people outside are using [[umbrella]]s, and if there are clouds in the sky. Someone who says that despite all this, it is not raining, but cannot provide evidence for this, would not undermine our judgment.  

From the criteria mentioned above, we could judge that "It is raining" if there are raindrops hitting the window, if people outside are using umbrellas, and if there are clouds in the sky. Someone who says that despite all this, it is not raining, but cannot provide evidence for this, would not undermine our judgment.  

However, if they demonstrated that there was a sophisticated projection and [[audio system]] to produce the [[illusion]] of our evidence, then we would probably reconsider our judgment. However, we would not do this lightly, we would demand evidence of the [[existence]] of such a system. Then it would need to be decided again upon available new evidence whether or not it was raining.

However, if they demonstrated that there was a sophisticated projection and audio system to produce the [[illusion]] of our evidence, then we would probably reconsider our judgment. However, we would not do this lightly, we would demand evidence of the [[existence]] of such a system. Then it would need to be decided again upon available new evidence whether or not it was raining.

Many forms of judgment, including the above example, require that they be supported by, and support, known [[fact]]s which are themselves well supported, and its negation must be shown to be unfounded, before it is accepted as well founded.

Many forms of judgment, including the above example, require that they be supported by, and support, known [[fact]]s which are themselves well supported, and its negation must be shown to be unfounded, before it is accepted as well founded.

==See also==

==See also==

*[[Choice]]

*'''''[[Choice]]'''''

*[[Justice]]

*'''''[[Justice]]'''''

== References ==

*'''''[https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Divine_Justice-2001-04-01 Divine Justice]'''''

*'''''[https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Paper_70#70:10._EVOLUTION_OF_JUSTICE Evolution of Justice]'''''

*'''''[https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Paper_76#76:6._SURVIVAL_OF_ADAM_AND_EVE Dispensational Adjudication]'''''

[[Category: Law]]

[[Category: Law]]

[[Category: Psychology]]

[[Category: Psychology]]

[[Category: Religion]]

[[Category: Religion]]