Changes

From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to search
170 bytes added ,  23:57, 2 July 2012
no edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:     
'''Justice''' is the concept of fairness based on [[ethics]], [[rationality]], [[law]], and [[equity]]. A conception of justice is one of the key features of [[society]]. Theories of justice vary greatly, but there is evidence that everyday views of justice can be reconciled with patterned moral preferences.
 
'''Justice''' is the concept of fairness based on [[ethics]], [[rationality]], [[law]], and [[equity]]. A conception of justice is one of the key features of [[society]]. Theories of justice vary greatly, but there is evidence that everyday views of justice can be reconciled with patterned moral preferences.
  −
   
== Concept of justice ==
 
== Concept of justice ==
 
'''Justice''' concerns the proper ordering of [[things]] and [[personalities|persons]] within a [[society]]. As a concept it has been subject to [[philosophy|philosophical]], [[law|legal]], and [[theology|theological]] reflection and debate throughout [[history]].
 
'''Justice''' concerns the proper ordering of [[things]] and [[personalities|persons]] within a [[society]]. As a concept it has been subject to [[philosophy|philosophical]], [[law|legal]], and [[theology|theological]] reflection and debate throughout [[history]].
Line 12: Line 10:     
Studies at UCLA in 2008 have indicated that reactions to fairness are "wired" into the brain and that, "Fairness is activating the same part of the brain that responds to food in rats... This is consistent with the notion that being treated fairly satisfies a basic need" [http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/brain-reacts-to-fairness-as-it-49042.aspx?link_page_rss=49042]. Research conducted in 2003 at Emory University, involving Capuchin Monkeys demonstrated that other cooperative animals also possess such a sense and that "inequality aversion may not be uniquely human" indicating that ideas of fairness and justice may be instinctual in [[nature]].
 
Studies at UCLA in 2008 have indicated that reactions to fairness are "wired" into the brain and that, "Fairness is activating the same part of the brain that responds to food in rats... This is consistent with the notion that being treated fairly satisfies a basic need" [http://newsroom.ucla.edu/portal/ucla/brain-reacts-to-fairness-as-it-49042.aspx?link_page_rss=49042]. Research conducted in 2003 at Emory University, involving Capuchin Monkeys demonstrated that other cooperative animals also possess such a sense and that "inequality aversion may not be uniquely human" indicating that ideas of fairness and justice may be instinctual in [[nature]].
 
+
<center>For lessons on the [[topic]] of '''''Justice''''', follow [http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Category:Justice '''''this link'''''].</center>
 
== Variations of justice ==
 
== Variations of justice ==
 
''[[Utilitarianism]]'' is a form of consequentialism, where punishment is forward-looking. Justified by the ability to achieve future social benefits resulting in crime reduction, the moral worth of an action is determined by its outcome.  
 
''[[Utilitarianism]]'' is a form of consequentialism, where punishment is forward-looking. Justified by the ability to achieve future social benefits resulting in crime reduction, the moral worth of an action is determined by its outcome.  
Line 116: Line 114:  
In [[physics]], a group of physicists examine [[data]] and theoretical [[concepts]] to consult on what might be the truth or [[reality]] of a [[phenomenon]].
 
In [[physics]], a group of physicists examine [[data]] and theoretical [[concepts]] to consult on what might be the truth or [[reality]] of a [[phenomenon]].
 
==Quote==
 
==Quote==
Mankind's struggle to perfect government on [[Urantia]] has to do with perfecting channels of administration, with adapting them to ever-changing current needs, with improving [[power]] distribution within government, and then with selecting such administrative leaders as are truly wise. While there is a [[divine]] and [[ideal]] form of government, such cannot be revealed but must be slowly and laboriously discovered by the men and women of each planet throughout the [[universe]]s of [[time]] and [[space]].[http://mercy.urantia.org/cgi-bin/webglimpse/mfs/usr/local/www/data/papers?link=http://mercy.urantia.org/papers/paper70.html&file=/usr/local/www/data/papers/paper70.html&line=314#mfs]
+
Mankind's struggle to perfect government on [[Urantia]] has to do with perfecting channels of administration, with adapting them to ever-changing current needs, with improving [[power]] distribution within government, and then with selecting such administrative leaders as are truly [[wisdom|wise]]. While there is a [[divine]] and [[ideal]] form of government, such cannot be revealed but must be slowly and laboriously discovered by the men and women of each planet throughout the [[universe]]s of [[time]] and [[space]].[http://mercy.urantia.org/cgi-bin/webglimpse/mfs/usr/local/www/data/papers?link=http://mercy.urantia.org/papers/paper70.html&file=/usr/local/www/data/papers/paper70.html&line=314#mfs]
 +
 
 
== References ==
 
== References ==
 
# James Konow (2003), "Which Is the Fairest One of All? A Positive Analysis of Justice Theories," Journal of Economic Literature, 41(4), p. 1188.
 
# James Konow (2003), "Which Is the Fairest One of All? A Positive Analysis of Justice Theories," Journal of Economic Literature, 41(4), p. 1188.

Navigation menu