Difference between revisions of "Natural Law"

From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Text replacement - "http://nordan.daynal.org" to "https://nordan.daynal.org")
Line 4: Line 4:
  
 
Natural law theories have exercised a [[profound]] [[influence]] on the development of [[English]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law common law],[3] and have featured greatly in the philosophies of [[Thomas Aquinas]], Francisco Suárez, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Hooker Richard Hooker], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hobbes Thomas Hobbes], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_Grotius Hugo Grotius], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_von_Pufendorf Samuel von Pufendorf], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Locke John Locke] and Emmerich de Vattel.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_law]
 
Natural law theories have exercised a [[profound]] [[influence]] on the development of [[English]] [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law common law],[3] and have featured greatly in the philosophies of [[Thomas Aquinas]], Francisco Suárez, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Hooker Richard Hooker], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hobbes Thomas Hobbes], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_Grotius Hugo Grotius], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_von_Pufendorf Samuel von Pufendorf], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Locke John Locke] and Emmerich de Vattel.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_law]
<center>For lessons on the [[topic]] of '''''Natural Law''''', follow [http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Category:Law/TeaM this link].</center>
+
<center>For lessons on the [[topic]] of '''''Natural Law''''', follow [https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Category:Law/TeaM this link].</center>
 
==External links==
 
==External links==
 
*Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:
 
*Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:

Revision as of 22:20, 12 December 2020

Lighterstill.jpg

Natural Law.jpg

Natural law or the law of nature (Latin: lex naturalis) is a theory that posits the existence of a law whose content is set by nature and that therefore has validity everywhere.[1] The phrase natural law is opposed to the positive law (which is man-made) of a given political community, society, or nation-state, and thus can function as a standard by which to criticize that law.[2] In natural law jurisprudence, on the other hand, the content of positive law cannot be known without some reference to the natural law (or something like it). Used in this way, natural law can be invoked to criticize decisions about the statutes, but less so to criticize the law itself. Some use natural law synonymously with natural justice or natural right (Latin ius naturale), although most contemporary political and legal theorists separate the two.

Natural law theories have exercised a profound influence on the development of English common law,[3] and have featured greatly in the philosophies of Thomas Aquinas, Francisco Suárez, Richard Hooker, Thomas Hobbes, Hugo Grotius, Samuel von Pufendorf, John Locke and Emmerich de Vattel.[1]

For lessons on the topic of Natural Law, follow this link.

External links