Difference between revisions of "Natural Law"
From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to searchm (Text replacement - "http://nordan.daynal.org" to "https://nordan.daynal.org") |
m (Text replacement - "http://" to "https://") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:lighterstill.jpg]][[File:Natural_Law.jpg|right|frame]] | [[File:lighterstill.jpg]][[File:Natural_Law.jpg|right|frame]] | ||
| − | '''Natural law''' or the [[law]] of [[nature]] ([[Latin]]: lex naturalis) is a [[theory]] that posits the [[existence]] of a law whose [[content]] is set by nature and that therefore has validity [[Omnipresence|everywhere]].[1] The phrase natural law is opposed to the [ | + | '''Natural law''' or the [[law]] of [[nature]] ([[Latin]]: lex naturalis) is a [[theory]] that posits the [[existence]] of a law whose [[content]] is set by nature and that therefore has validity [[Omnipresence|everywhere]].[1] The phrase natural law is opposed to the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_law positive law] (which is man-made) of a given [[political]] [[community]], [[society]], or nation-[[state]], and thus can [[function]] as a [[standard]] by which to [[criticize]] that law.[2] In natural law jurisprudence, on the other hand, the content of positive law cannot be known without some [[reference]] to the natural law (or something like it). Used in this way, natural law can be invoked to criticize [[decisions]] about the statutes, but less so to criticize the law itself. Some use natural law synonymously with natural [[justice]] or natural right (Latin ius naturale), although most contemporary political and legal [[theorists]] separate the two. |
| − | Natural law theories have exercised a [[profound]] [[influence]] on the development of [[English]] [ | + | Natural law theories have exercised a [[profound]] [[influence]] on the development of [[English]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law common law],[3] and have featured greatly in the philosophies of [[Thomas Aquinas]], Francisco Suárez, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Hooker Richard Hooker], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Hobbes Thomas Hobbes], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_Grotius Hugo Grotius], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_von_Pufendorf Samuel von Pufendorf], [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Locke John Locke] and Emmerich de Vattel.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_law] |
<center>For lessons on the [[topic]] of '''''Natural Law''''', follow [https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Category:Law/TeaM this link].</center> | <center>For lessons on the [[topic]] of '''''Natural Law''''', follow [https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Category:Law/TeaM this link].</center> | ||
==External links== | ==External links== | ||
*Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: | *Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy: | ||
| − | **[ | + | **[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/natural-law-ethics/ The Natural Law Tradition in Ethics], by Mark Murphy, 2002. |
| − | **[ | + | **[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/aquinas-moral-political/ Aquinas' Moral, Political, and Legal Philosophy], by John Finnis, 2005. |
| − | **[ | + | **[https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/natural-law-theories/ Natural Law Theories], by John Finnis, 2007. |
| − | *[ | + | *[https://www.newadvent.org/summa/2094.htm Aquinas on natural law] |
| − | *[ | + | *[https://www.rsrevision.com/Alevel/ethics/natural_law/index.htm Natural Law explained, evaluated and applied] A clear introduction to Natural Law |
| − | *[ | + | *[https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09076a.htm ''Catholic Encyclopedia'' "Natural Law"] |
| − | *[ | + | *[https://www.iep.utm.edu/n/natlaw.htm Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy Entry 'Natural Law' by Kenneth Einar Himma] |
[[Category: Philosophy]] | [[Category: Philosophy]] | ||
Latest revision as of 01:41, 13 December 2020
Natural law or the law of nature (Latin: lex naturalis) is a theory that posits the existence of a law whose content is set by nature and that therefore has validity everywhere.[1] The phrase natural law is opposed to the positive law (which is man-made) of a given political community, society, or nation-state, and thus can function as a standard by which to criticize that law.[2] In natural law jurisprudence, on the other hand, the content of positive law cannot be known without some reference to the natural law (or something like it). Used in this way, natural law can be invoked to criticize decisions about the statutes, but less so to criticize the law itself. Some use natural law synonymously with natural justice or natural right (Latin ius naturale), although most contemporary political and legal theorists separate the two.
Natural law theories have exercised a profound influence on the development of English common law,[3] and have featured greatly in the philosophies of Thomas Aquinas, Francisco Suárez, Richard Hooker, Thomas Hobbes, Hugo Grotius, Samuel von Pufendorf, John Locke and Emmerich de Vattel.[1]
External links
- Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy:
- The Natural Law Tradition in Ethics, by Mark Murphy, 2002.
- Aquinas' Moral, Political, and Legal Philosophy, by John Finnis, 2005.
- Natural Law Theories, by John Finnis, 2007.
- Aquinas on natural law
- Natural Law explained, evaluated and applied A clear introduction to Natural Law
- Catholic Encyclopedia "Natural Law"
- Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy Entry 'Natural Law' by Kenneth Einar Himma
