Difference between revisions of "Neutral"
(Created page with 'File:lighterstill.jpgright|frame ==Origin== [http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=English#ca._1100-1500_.09THE_MIDDLE_ENGLISH_PERIOD Middle Eng...') |
m (Text replacement - "http://" to "https://") |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
==Origin== | ==Origin== | ||
| − | [ | + | [https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=English#ca._1100-1500_.09THE_MIDDLE_ENGLISH_PERIOD Middle English] ''neuterall'' mutually neutralizing, from Medieval Latin ''neutralis'', back-formation from ''neutralitas'' middle ground, from Latin ''neutralis'' neuter, from ''neutr''-, classical Latin ''neutrālis'' neither [[masculine]] nor [[feminine]] |
| − | *[ | + | *[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16th_century 1549] |
==Definitions== | ==Definitions== | ||
*1: not [[engaged]] on either side; specifically : not [[aligned]] with a [[political]] or [[ideological]] grouping <a neutral nation> | *1: not [[engaged]] on either side; specifically : not [[aligned]] with a [[political]] or [[ideological]] grouping <a neutral nation> | ||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
*4: produced with the tongue in the position it has when at [[rest]] <the neutral vowels of \ə-ˈbəv\ above> | *4: produced with the tongue in the position it has when at [[rest]] <the neutral vowels of \ə-ˈbəv\ above> | ||
==Description== | ==Description== | ||
| − | '''Neutrality''' is the [[absence]] of declared [[bias]]. In an [[argument]], a neutral person will not [[choose]] a side. A [ | + | '''Neutrality''' is the [[absence]] of declared [[bias]]. In an [[argument]], a neutral person will not [[choose]] a side. A [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutral_country neutral country] maintains [[political]] neutrality, a related but distinct concept. |
Neutrality is not synonymous with indifference or [[ignorance]]. One can be actively [[engaged]] in a [[dispute]], yet not publicly choose a side. The moderator of a [[debate]] is expected to remain neutral. Neutrality is not synonymous with [[silence]]. A mediator facilitates [[dialog]] between parties. Doublethink implies defending two or more [[contradictory]] [[ideas]], whereas neutrality implies not defending any. | Neutrality is not synonymous with indifference or [[ignorance]]. One can be actively [[engaged]] in a [[dispute]], yet not publicly choose a side. The moderator of a [[debate]] is expected to remain neutral. Neutrality is not synonymous with [[silence]]. A mediator facilitates [[dialog]] between parties. Doublethink implies defending two or more [[contradictory]] [[ideas]], whereas neutrality implies not defending any. | ||
| − | Neutrality is not synonymous with [[objectivity]]. In a [[controversy]], an objective person will not remain neutral but will choose the side [[supported]] by the most objective [[arguments]]. Objectivity therefore requires a [[choice]], which is often [[difficult]], whereas neutrality requires no choice. Note that in [ | + | Neutrality is not synonymous with [[objectivity]]. In a [[controversy]], an objective person will not remain neutral but will choose the side [[supported]] by the most objective [[arguments]]. Objectivity therefore requires a [[choice]], which is often [[difficult]], whereas neutrality requires no choice. Note that in [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objectivity_(journalism) journalism objectivity] is considered synonymous with neutrality. |
| − | Neutrality implies not [[judging]] the validity of an [[opinion]]. Thus, a neutral person will provide a platform for all [[opinions]], including irrational or malicious opinions. According to [[Dante]], The [[darkest]] places in [[hell]] are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of [[moral]] [[crisis]]. [ | + | Neutrality implies not [[judging]] the validity of an [[opinion]]. Thus, a neutral person will provide a platform for all [[opinions]], including irrational or malicious opinions. According to [[Dante]], The [[darkest]] places in [[hell]] are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of [[moral]] [[crisis]]. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Woodrow_Wilson Woodrow Wilson] said " ''neutrality is a [[negative]] [[word]]. It does not [[express]] what [[America]] ought to [[feel]]. We are not trying to keep out of trouble; we are trying to [[preserve]] the [[foundations]] on which [[peace]] may be rebuilt.'' "[https://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/w/woodrowwil401895.html] |
[[Category: Philosophy]] | [[Category: Philosophy]] | ||
[[Category: Law]] | [[Category: Law]] | ||
Latest revision as of 01:36, 13 December 2020
Origin
Middle English neuterall mutually neutralizing, from Medieval Latin neutralis, back-formation from neutralitas middle ground, from Latin neutralis neuter, from neutr-, classical Latin neutrālis neither masculine nor feminine
Definitions
- 1: not engaged on either side; specifically : not aligned with a political or ideological grouping <a neutral nation>
- 2: of or relating to a neutral state or power <neutral territory>
- 3a : not decided or pronounced as to characteristics : indifferent
- b (1) : achromatic (2) : nearly achromatic
- c (1) : neuter 3 (2) : lacking stamens or pistils
- d : neither acid nor basic
- e : not electrically charged
- 4: produced with the tongue in the position it has when at rest <the neutral vowels of \ə-ˈbəv\ above>
Description
Neutrality is the absence of declared bias. In an argument, a neutral person will not choose a side. A neutral country maintains political neutrality, a related but distinct concept.
Neutrality is not synonymous with indifference or ignorance. One can be actively engaged in a dispute, yet not publicly choose a side. The moderator of a debate is expected to remain neutral. Neutrality is not synonymous with silence. A mediator facilitates dialog between parties. Doublethink implies defending two or more contradictory ideas, whereas neutrality implies not defending any.
Neutrality is not synonymous with objectivity. In a controversy, an objective person will not remain neutral but will choose the side supported by the most objective arguments. Objectivity therefore requires a choice, which is often difficult, whereas neutrality requires no choice. Note that in journalism objectivity is considered synonymous with neutrality.
Neutrality implies not judging the validity of an opinion. Thus, a neutral person will provide a platform for all opinions, including irrational or malicious opinions. According to Dante, The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis. Woodrow Wilson said " neutrality is a negative word. It does not express what America ought to feel. We are not trying to keep out of trouble; we are trying to preserve the foundations on which peace may be rebuilt. "[1]
