Talk:2012-01-06-Conversations with Monjoronson 37
Oliver wrote: Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 7:56 PM
We should know that there is already huge resistance against the idea of one world government, because the critics fear the power of multi-national corporations and their stated agendas for total world domination. We are seeing opposed the teaching of a democratically elected world government, that is essential for a Light and Life era of a planet, versus the theory that powerful cartels are seeking world domination.
I offer this link to show a trend of a volitional misunderstanding of The Urantia Book, and using its teachings as proof for the trend towards globalization: http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=128532.0
For those of you who have watched Thrive by Procter and Gamble heir Foster Gamble, will know the extend the US government has been secretly preparing for a civil war, the government has obvious plans to use the military to contain domestic "terrorists" and insurgents. I think this article is a good outline for this observation. http://www.thrivemovement.com/bullet-points-ammunition-might-be-used-against-you.blog For you have not watched Thrive, it can be streamed from here: http://www.thrivemovement.com/the_movie
Michael McCray, as moderator for the sessions with Charles, could you wrap your head around the evidence and accusations voiced by Foster Gamble, Alex Jones, Paul Watson, and many others, who have indeed been able to describe a detailed trend of governments' preparing domination of their populace.
Would you be so kind and speak about these observations of documented conspiracies misusing economic power with the aim of world domination for the most base reptile-behavior reasons, instead of a more enlightened view of a democratically achieved world government with one religion and even one language. Does Charles see these dangers the way so many of us observe them? Do the celestials monitor the mega banks, federal reserves which are not federal at all, the world bank, the int. money funds, etc. and observe their purely selfish reptilian decisions such as documented in the Confessions of an Economic Hit Man? What are the real dangers that cause delays towards a world government? Are there indeed celestial hit men, who will make the decision makers for the dark economic forces disappear, as has been transmitted several times?
The Fellowship website has an attempt of an answer as a FAQ: http://truthbook.com/faq/dsp_viewFAQ.cfm?faqID=1635
An excellent discussion by Urantia Book readers from the 90s on the subject of world government: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JecrEetsgTY
Roxanne wrote: Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 11:09 PM
Oliver, I think you misread Charles' answer. Perhaps Michael's question threw you off. What Charles was saying is that the borders in So. Am. would become more porous in a fashion similar to the borders between states in the USA, where you don't have to exchange monetary units between them, that trade between the different countries would happen more easily than presently. He hasn't said anything about a "union of nations," or about "one world government."
I think that none of the celestials, including Charles are into putting any energy into the conspiracy theories that abound among humans. They focus more on the positive efforts that will eventually replace evil with the goodness of the Father.
Roxanne
Steffani wrote: Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:23 AM
It did seem that Michael's prior misunderstanding muddied the question, if not the answer, Charles seemed to be saying, as I read it, that the initial phase of whatever transitions the future might hold would begin by the boundaries between many or most of the (smaller?) S. American nations becoming more PERMEABLE...
Living in Costa Rica, Oliver, are you seeing any signs of that happening? How restrictive are the government regulations when traveling to visit the adjoining 'neighbor' countries?
How much red tape and rigamarole would you, for instance, have to go through to take a short trip to Guatemala, Belize, Honduras, El Salvador, Nicaragua, or Panama?
After all, my favorite residual 'esoteric' combo 'channeled' message, from FER 'all stars', including 'Mac the Counselors', 'the Code of Love' came out of S.A. and was all about dissolving the restrictive boundaries around the staked out claims mankind has placed around their bigger or smaller cultural fiefdoms of dirt known as 'sovereign nation states'...
If we were rapidly becoming more 'godlike' we'd realize our Paradise Father even SEES all the individuated universes as all ONE...
So I AM very Curious,
Steff
Michael McCray wrote: Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:46 PM
Hello Oliver:
Some time ago I asked Monjoronson some questions about conspiracy theories. They dealt with the illuminati and the answers he gave me were not at all helpful. It is not that he did not answer my questions it is just that the answers did not conform to the question. I do not remember the specifics of the questions or answers but you should be able to find the transcripts.
Afterwards he told me he did not wish me to present any more questions about conspiracies or potential conspiracies as these types of questions do not represent the type of information they wish to share with us.
You may have noticed that very few of our sessions are devoted to random questions; typically a theme is involved in our sessions. At the moment Charles is involved in giving us information about a new social sustainability moral code. If you wish to ask questions on that topic, I would be happy to present them to Charles or Monjoronson.
Thank you for your interest.
IMS, Michael
Rob wrote: Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 1:56 PM
Nothing like 'celestial' beings discouraging truth discovery.
Michael M. wrote:Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:57 PM
More like celestials not wishing to engage in rumor and innuendo. Hay Rob would you be able to dig up the transcript I was telling Oliver about? Please. Thanks
Rob wrote: Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:58 PM
Here are the comments referenced.
Rob wrote: Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:59 PM
Hello Michael-
I just posted it as you were posting your request. Findings of judicial inquiry are hardly 'rumors'.
Michael M. wrote:Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 3:01 PM
Thank you again Rob. MMc
