Changes

1. Quite a glorious world you live on. But for the people, it is one of Christ Michael’s pristine jewels...[http://www.nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2012-04-20-Conversations_with_Monjoronson_48#Opening 1]

1. Quite a glorious world you live on. But for the people, it is one of Christ Michael’s pristine jewels...[http://www.nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2012-04-20-Conversations_with_Monjoronson_48#Opening 1]

This is emblematic of misanthropy and not divine love revealed by the extension of mercy.

:This is emblematic of misanthropy and not divine love revealed by the extension of mercy.

2. It is not evolutionary, but it is developmental in a unique way that will become an evolution of darkness into light. [http://www.nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2012-04-20-Conversations_with_Monjoronson_48#Avonal_Sons.2C_Urantia 2]

2. It is not evolutionary, but it is developmental in a unique way that will become an evolution of darkness into light. [http://www.nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2012-04-20-Conversations_with_Monjoronson_48#Avonal_Sons.2C_Urantia 2]

One is led to wonder how evolution is distinguished from what is evolutionary. - especially when followed by

:One is led to wonder how evolution is distinguished from what is evolutionary. - especially when followed by

3.  We will...create a new peaceful, evolutionary world that is actively, consciously, evolutionary and intentional.[http://www.nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2012-04-20-Conversations_with_Monjoronson_48#Future 3]

3.  We will...create a new peaceful, evolutionary world that is actively, consciously, evolutionary and intentional.[http://www.nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2012-04-20-Conversations_with_Monjoronson_48#Future 3]

Given the doubly awkward use of evolutionary, it appears conceptual confusion is in evidence.

:Given the doubly awkward use of evolutionary, it appears conceptual confusion is in evidence.

Given the fact most are familiar with the inherent limitations of the transmitting process, mentioning the above may be seen as unnecessary. Given the inclination for some though to read words attributed to divine beings as perfect, I thought it may be best to comment "for the record".

Given the fact most are familiar with the inherent limitations of the transmitting process, mentioning the above may be seen as unnecessary. Given the inclination for some though to read words attributed to divine beings as perfect, I thought it may be best to comment "for the record".

Notwithstanding this, I appreciate the service of those making this dialogue possible.--rdavis 02:11, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Notwithstanding this, I appreciate the service of those making this dialogue possible.--rdavis 02:11, 24 April 2012 (UTC)