Changes

Rob wrote: Monday, April 23, 2012 at 9:10 CDT

Rob wrote: Monday, April 23, 2012 at 9:10 CDT

While limitations of [http://www.nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2012-04-20-Conversations_with_Monjoronson_48#Language language] were referenced as precluding an expanded description of Paradise beyond the fine description currently existing, I note the following expressions that seem to embody thought that does not reach even the low human standards prevailing upon our world.

While limitations of [https://www.nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2012-04-20-Conversations_with_Monjoronson_48#Language language] were referenced as precluding an expanded description of Paradise beyond the fine description currently existing, I note the following expressions that seem to embody thought that does not reach even the low human standards prevailing upon our world.

1. Quite a glorious world you live on. But for the people, it is one of Christ Michael’s pristine jewels...[http://www.nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2012-04-20-Conversations_with_Monjoronson_48#Opening 1]

1. Quite a glorious world you live on. But for the people, it is one of Christ Michael’s pristine jewels...[https://www.nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2012-04-20-Conversations_with_Monjoronson_48#Opening 1]

:This is emblematic of misanthropy and not divine love revealed by the extension of mercy.

:This is emblematic of misanthropy and not divine love revealed by the extension of mercy.

2. It is not evolutionary, but it is developmental in a unique way that will become an evolution of darkness into light. [http://www.nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2012-04-20-Conversations_with_Monjoronson_48#Avonal_Sons.2C_Urantia 2]

2. It is not evolutionary, but it is developmental in a unique way that will become an evolution of darkness into light. [https://www.nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2012-04-20-Conversations_with_Monjoronson_48#Avonal_Sons.2C_Urantia 2]

:One is led to wonder how evolution is distinguished from what is evolutionary. - especially when followed by

:One is led to wonder how evolution is distinguished from what is evolutionary. - especially when followed by

3.  We will...create a new peaceful, evolutionary world that is actively, consciously, evolutionary and intentional.[http://www.nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2012-04-20-Conversations_with_Monjoronson_48#Future 3]

3.  We will...create a new peaceful, evolutionary world that is actively, consciously, evolutionary and intentional.[https://www.nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2012-04-20-Conversations_with_Monjoronson_48#Future 3]

:Given the doubly awkward use of evolutionary, it appears conceptual confusion is in evidence.

:Given the doubly awkward use of evolutionary, it appears conceptual confusion is in evidence.

Hello Michael-

Hello Michael-

I appreciate your understanding of intent in the phrase with which I can concur. Notwithstanding this interpretation, when anyone says the world is great but for its people, they reveal a mind alienated from its Source. This is observed in those who value predictable mechanisms more than the 'noncomputable' value of personality. ([http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=12:3_Universal_Gravity 1])  In fact, "persons", even as we are in this and every moment, are of immeasurable value because each is an infinitesimal facet of the Infinite personality.

I appreciate your understanding of intent in the phrase with which I can concur. Notwithstanding this interpretation, when anyone says the world is great but for its people, they reveal a mind alienated from its Source. This is observed in those who value predictable mechanisms more than the 'noncomputable' value of personality. ([https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=12:3_Universal_Gravity 1])  In fact, "persons", even as we are in this and every moment, are of immeasurable value because each is an infinitesimal facet of the Infinite personality.

Gratefully,

Gratefully,