102,815
edits
Changes
From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to searchTalk:2013-05-16-Openness to Possibility (view source)
Revision as of 20:42, 28 May 2013
, 20:42, 28 May 2013no edit summary
[[133:4|133:4.7]] To the Roman judge he said: “As you judge men, remember that you yourself will also some day come to judgment before the bar of the Rulers of a universe. Judge justly, even mercifully, even as you shall some day thus crave merciful consideration at the hands of the Supreme Arbiter. Judge as you would be judged under similar circumstances, thus being guided by the spirit of the law as well as by its letter. And even as you accord justice dominated by fairness in the light of the need of those who are brought before you, so shall you have the right to expect justice tempered by mercy when you sometime stand before the Judge of all the earth.”--rdavis 23:26, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
[[133:4|133:4.7]] To the Roman judge he said: “As you judge men, remember that you yourself will also some day come to judgment before the bar of the Rulers of a universe. Judge justly, even mercifully, even as you shall some day thus crave merciful consideration at the hands of the Supreme Arbiter. Judge as you would be judged under similar circumstances, thus being guided by the spirit of the law as well as by its letter. And even as you accord justice dominated by fairness in the light of the need of those who are brought before you, so shall you have the right to expect justice tempered by mercy when you sometime stand before the Judge of all the earth.”--rdavis 23:26, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
'''Rob wrote on tml May 28,2013 at 7:42pm'''
I am most grateful for the openness demonstrated in this 'lesson' even while I withhold concern for its apparently authoritative source. It has been my experience through the course of over 40 years of observing attempts at free thinking by persons enamored with illusions of authority adorning words attributed to "divine" beings that such attribution itself a stumbling block. How long before human beings recognize the only valid authority in matters of spirit is their personal experience? It would appear that the troublesome concept of UB'ers, TeaMers, MM'ers, all share alike a presupposition upon shared dogma that upon closer examination does not exist. Welcome to personal responsibility!
p.s. I am saving comments on this lesson in its discussion page.
