Changes

There are two distinct views on the meaning of '''time'''.

There are two distinct views on the meaning of '''time'''.

One view is that time is part of the fundamental structure of the [[universe]], a [[dimension]] in which events occur in [[sequence]], and time itself is something that can be measured. This is the [[Philosophical realism|realist]]'s view, to which [[Sir Isaac Newton]] subscribed, and hence is sometimes referred to as [[Newtonian time]].<ref>Newton's Views on Space, Time, and Motion - Stanford University [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/newton-stm/]

One view is that time is part of the fundamental structure of the [[universe]], a [[dimension]] in which events occur in [[sequence]], and time itself is something that can be measured. This is the [[Philosophical realism|realist]]'s view, to which [[Sir Isaac Newton]] subscribed, and hence is sometimes referred to as [[Newtonian time]] (''Newton's Views on Space, Time, and Motion'' - Stanford University [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/newton-stm/]

 

A contrasting view is that time is part of the fundamental intellectual structure (together with [[space]] and [[number]]). Within this structure, humans sequence events, [[quantity|quantify]] the duration of events and the intervals between them, and compare the [[motion (physics)|motions]] of objects. In this second view, time does not refer to any kind of entity that "flows", that objects "move through", or that is a "container" for events. This view is in the tradition of [[Gottfried Leibniz]]<ref> Leibniz on Space, Time, and Indiscernibles - Against the Absolute Theory -- Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy [http://www.iep.utm.edu/l/leib-met.htm#H7] and [[Immanuel Kant]], Critique of Pure Reason - Lecture notes of G. J. Mattey, UC Davis [http://www-philosophy.ucdavis.edu/mattey/kant/TIMELEC.HTM] Kant's Transcendental Idealism - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy [http://www.iep.utm.edu/k/kantmeta.htm#H4] in which time, rather than being an objective thing to be measured, is part of the [[mind|mental]] measuring system.

A contrasting view is that time is part of the fundamental intellectual structure (together with [[space]] and [[number]]). Within this structure, humans sequence events, [[quantity|quantify]] the duration of events and the intervals between them, and compare the [[motion (physics)|motions]] of objects. In this second view, time does not refer to any kind of entity that "flows", that objects "move through", or that is a "container" for events. This view is in the tradition of [[Gottfried Leibniz]]<ref> Leibniz on Space, Time, and Indiscernibles - Against the Absolute Theory -- Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy [http://www.iep.utm.edu/l/leib-met.htm#H7] and [[Immanuel Kant]], Critique of Pure Reason - Lecture notes of G. J. Mattey, UC Davis [http://www-philosophy.ucdavis.edu/mattey/kant/TIMELEC.HTM] Kant's Transcendental Idealism - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy [http://www.iep.utm.edu/k/kantmeta.htm#H4] in which time, rather than being an objective thing to be measured, is part of the [[mind|mental]] measuring system.

===Time and the Big Bang===

===Time and the Big Bang===

According to some of the latest scientific theories, time began with the [[Big Bang]]. [[Stephen Hawking]] (borrowing a line of thought from [[Augustine of Hippo]]) has commented that trying to ascertain what happened before time began is like trying to find out what is north of the North Pole, and that such questions are self-contradictory, and thus without meaning.<ref>http://www.ghandchi.com/312-SpaceEng.htm</ref> Hawking has also stated, along with other theorists, that even if time did not begin with the Big Bang and there were another time frame before the Big Bang, no information from events then would be accessible to us, and nothing that happened then would have any effect upon the present time-frame.<ref>Public lecture on the beginning of time by Hawking http://www.hawking.org.uk/lectures/bot.html</ref>  Scientists have come to some agreement on descriptions of events that happened 10⁻³⁵ seconds after the Big Bang, but generally agree that descriptions about what happened before one [[Planck time]] after the Big Bang will likely remain pure speculation.

According to some of the latest scientific theories, time began with the [[Big Bang]]. [[Stephen Hawking]] (borrowing a line of thought from [[Augustine of Hippo]]) has commented that trying to ascertain what happened before time began is like trying to find out what is north of the North Pole, and that such questions are self-contradictory, and thus without meaning.[http://www.ghandchi.com/312-SpaceEng.htm] Hawking has also stated, along with other theorists, that even if time did not begin with the Big Bang and there were another time frame before the Big Bang, no information from events then would be accessible to us, and nothing that happened then would have any effect upon the present time-frame.<ref>Public lecture on the beginning of time by Hawking [http://www.hawking.org.uk/lectures/bot.html]. Scientists have come to some agreement on descriptions of events that happened seconds after the Big Bang, but generally agree that descriptions about what happened before one [[Planck time]] after the Big Bang will likely remain pure speculation.

===Time travel in science fiction===

===Time travel in science fiction===

[[Category: General Reference]]

[[Category: General Reference]]