|
|
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | [[Image:lighterstill.jpg]] | + | [[Image:lighterstill.jpg]][[File:BenFranklin-AmericanLife.jpg|right|frame]] |
| − | [[Image:Biography.jpg|right]] | |
| | | | |
| − | A '''biography''' (from the [[Greek language|Greek]] words ''bios'' meaning "life", and ''graphos'' meaning "write") is an account of a person's life, usually [[publishing|published]] in the form of a book or essay, or in some other form, such as a film. An [[autobiography]] (''auto'', meaning "self", giving ''self-biography'') is a biography by the same person it is about. A biography is more than a list of impersonal facts (like birth, education, work, relationships and death), it also portrays the subject's experience of those events. Unlike a [[profile]] or [[curriculum vitae]], a biography presents the subject's story, highlighting various aspects of his or her life, including intimate details of experiences, and may include an analysis of the subject's personality.
| + | ==Origin== |
| | + | Late Greek ''biographia'', from [[Greek]] ''bi''- + -''graphia'' -''graphy'' |
| | + | *[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/17th_century 1683] |
| | + | ==Definitions== |
| | + | *1: a usually written [[history]] of a person's [[life]] |
| | + | *2: biographical writings as a whole |
| | + | *3: an account of the life of something (as an [[animal]], a coin, or a building) |
| | + | ==Description== |
| | + | A '''biography''' or simply ''bio'' is a detailed [[description]] or account of a person's [[life]]. It entails more than basic [[facts]] like [[education]], [[work]], [[relationships]], and [[death]]—a biography also portrays a subject's [[experience]] of these [[events]]. Unlike a profile or curriculum vitae ([[résumé]]), a biography presents a subject's life [[story]], highlighting various aspects of his or her life, including [[intimate]] details of experience, and may include an [[analysis]] of the subject's [[personality]]. |
| | | | |
| − | A work is '''biographical''' if it covers all or part of a person's life. Biographical works are usually non-fiction, but fiction can also be used to portray a person's life. One in-depth form of biographical coverage is called [[legacy writing]]. Together, all biographical works form the [[genre]] known as '''biography''', in literature, film, and other forms of [[media]].
| + | Biographical works are usually nonfiction, but [[fiction]] can also be used to portray a person's life. One in-depth form of biographical coverage is called [[legacy]] writing. Works in diverse [[media]]—from [[literature]] to [[film]]—form the genre known as biography. |
| | | | |
| − | ==Early forms==
| + | An authorized biography is written with the permission, [[cooperation]], and at times, [[participation]] of a subject or a subject's heirs. An [[autobiography]] is written by the person themselves, sometimes with the assistance of a collaborator or [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghostwriter ghostwriter]. |
| − | The first known biographies were written by [[scribes]] commissioned by the various rulers of antiquity: ancient [[Assyria]], ancient [[Babylonia]], ancient [[Egypt]], ancient [[Mesopotamia]], among others. Such biographies tended to be chiseled into [[Rock (geology)|stone]] or [[clay]] tablets, a method called [[Cuneiform script|cuneiform]].
| |
| | | | |
| − | The [[Judaism|Jewish]] [[Hebrew Bible|holy scripture]] is an [[anthology]] of some of the earliest biographies in existence, detailing the lives of [[Tribal chief|chief]]s, [[Monarch|kings]], [[tribe]]s, [[patriarchs]] and [[prophet]]s. However, the dates of these written accounts are disputed.
| + | At first, biographical writings were regarded merely as a subsection of [[history]] with a [[focus]] on a particular [[individual]] of historical importance. The independent [[genre]] of biography as distinct from general history writing, began to [[emerge]] in the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/18th_century 18th century] and reached its contemporary form at the turn of the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/20th_century 20th century].[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biography] |
| | | | |
| − | ==Classical forms==
| |
| − | Ancient Greeks developed the biographical tradition which we have inherited, although until the 5th century AD, when the word 'biographia' first appears, in Damascius' Life of Isodorus, biographical pieces were called simply "lives" (βιοι: "bioi"). It is quite likely that the Greeks were drawing on a pre-existing eastern tradition; certainly [[Herodotus]]' Histories contains more detailed biographical information on Persian kings and subjects than on anyone else, implying he had a Persian source for it.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The earliest surviving pieces which we would identify as biographical are Isocrates' Life of Evagoras and [[Xenophon]]'s Life of [[Agesilaos]], both from the fifth century BC. Both identified themselves as encomia, or works of praise, and that biography was regarded as a discrete entity from historiography is evidenced by the fact that Xenophon treated King Agesilaos of Sparta twice in his works, once in the above-mentioned encomium and once in his Greek History; evidently the two genres were conceived as making different demands of authors who enrolled in them. Xenophon could present his Cyropaedia, an account of the childhood of the Persian King [[Cyrus]] the Great now regarded as so fabulous that it falls rather into a novelistic tradition than a biographical one, as a serious work, without any disclaimers or caveats.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Whereas [[Thucydides]] set the benchmark for a historiographical tradition comprising 'conclusions ... drawn from proofs quoted ... [which] may safely be relied upon' (Thuc. 1.21), and offering little explicit judgement on the men with whom he dealt, biographers were quite often more concerned with drawing a moral point from their investigations of their subjects. [[Parallel Lives]] by [[Plutarch]], a Greek writing under the Roman empire, is a series of short biographies of eminent men, ancient and contemporary, arranged in pairs comprising one Greek, one Roman, in order that a broad educative point might be extraced from the comparison (for example [[Mark Antony]] and [[Demetrius I of Macedon|Demetrius]] were paradigms of tyranny, [[Lysander]] and [[Sulla]] examples of great men degenerating into blood-thirsty corruption).
| |
| − |
| |
| − | However, although their moralising approach is not in fashion in the current intellectual climate, Greek biographies still have much to offer the modern reader, and for the most part it is reasonable to assume that while authors may have suppressed details which did not fall in with the general theme which they wished to convey, they are unlikely to have fabricated much. Not least, they were instrumental in developing the modern idea of the person. The traditional Greek attitude to individuals was to 'reduce them to types'; the Peripatetic tradition records various categories into which men might fall: the flatterer, the superstitious man and so on. Greek rhetorical handbooks give advice on 'ethopoia', that is creating a character, one of a recognised type, to win favour in the law courts.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The biographical tradition does draw on these types, but it also gives explicit recognition to the importance of individual ideosyncrasies in defining a man, and places the emphasis firmly on a man's personality rather than merely listing his accomplishments. As Plutarch says in the introduction to his Life of [[Alexander the Great]], 'in the most illustrious deeds there is not always a manifestation of virtue and vice, but a slight thing like a phrase or a jest often makes a greater revelation than battles where thousands fall, or the greatest armaments, or sieges of cities'. Thus the individual is recognised as having some value and interest irrespective of the impact of his actions on the broader sweep of history.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Under the [[Roman Empire]], the biographical and historiographical traditions converged somewhat, likely due to the nature of government, whereby the state was dominated by a single emperor with totalitarian power and whose character and actions set the tone for the period; [[Tacitus]]'s History and his Annals, as well as [[Dio]]'s History contain much of the same material as the biographer [[Suetonius]]'s Lives of the Twelve Caesars. However, although Tacitus in particular was extremely critical of the regime, his disapproval emerges in subtle characterisation and arrangement of his material, in contrast with Suetonius' vicious authorial comment.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Middle Ages and Renaissance==
| |
| − | The Early [[Middle Ages]] (AD 400 to 1450) saw a decline in awareness of classical culture. During this time, the only repositories of knowledge and records of early history was the [[Roman Catholic Church]]. [[Hermit]]s, [[monk]]s and [[priest]]s used this historic period to write the first modern biographies. Their subjects were usually restricted to [[church father]]s, [[martyr]]s, [[papacy|popes]] and [[saint]]s. Their works were meant to be inspirational to people, vehicles for [[conversion]] to [[Christianity]]. See [[hagiography]]. One significant example of biography from this period which does not exactly fit into that mold is the life of [[Charlemagne]] as written by his courtier [[Einhard]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | By the late Middle Ages, biographies became less church-oriented as biographies of [[monarch|king]]s, [[knight]]s and [[tyrant]]s began to appear. The most famous of these such biographies was ''[[Le Morte d'Arthur]]'' by [[Sir Thomas Malory]]. The book was an account of the life of the fabled [[King Arthur]] and his [[Knights of the Round Table]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Following Malory, the new emphasis on [[humanism]] during the [[Renaissance]] promoted a focus on secular subjects such as [[artist]]s and [[poet]]s, and encouraged writing in the vernacular.
| |
| − | [[Giorgio Vasari]]'s ''[[Lives of the Artists]]'' (1550) was a landmark biography focusing on secular lives. Vasari created celebrities of his subjects, as the ''Lives'' became an early "best seller." Two other developments are noteworthy: the development of the [[printing press]] in the fifteenth century and the gradual increase in [[literacy]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Biographies in the English language began appearing during the reign of Henry VIII. John Foxe’s ''Acts and Monuments'' (1563), better known as [[Foxe's Book of Martyrs]], essentially was the first dictionary of biography, followed by Thomas Fuller’s ''The History of the Worthies of England'' (1662), with a distinct focus on public life.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Modern biography==
| |
| − | The "Golden Age" of English biography emerged in the late 1700s, the century in which the terms "biography" and "autobiography" entered the English [[lexicon]]. The classic works of the period were [[Samuel Johnson]]'s ''Critical Lives of the Poets'' (1779-81) and [[James Boswell]]'s massive ''Life of Johnson'' (1791). The Boswellian approach to biography emphasized uncovering material and letting the subject "speak for itself." While Boswell compiled, Samuel Johnson composed. Johnson did not follow a chronological narration of the subject's life but used anecdotes and incidents selectively. Johnson rejected the notion that facts revealed truth. He suggested that biographers should seek their subject in "domestic privacies", to find little known facts or anecdotes which revealed character. (Casper, 1999)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The romantic biographers disputed many of Johnson's judgments. [[Jean Jacques Rousseau]]'s ''Confessions'' (1781-88) exploited the romantic point of view and the confessional mode. The tradition of testimony and confession was brought to the New World by Puritan and Quaker memoirists and journal-keepers where the form continued to be influential. [[Benjamin Franklin]]'s autobiography (1791) would provide the archetype for the American success story. (Stone, 1982) [[Autobiography]] would remain an influential form of biographical writing.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Generally, American biography followed the English model, however, incorporating [[Thomas Carlyle]]'s view that biography was a part of history. Carlyle asserted that the lives of great men were important to understanding society and its institutions. While the historical impulse would remain a strong element in early American biography, American writers carved out their own distinct approach. What emerged was a rather didactic form of biography which sought to shape individual character of the reader in the process of defining national character. (Casper, 1999)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The distinction between mass biography and literary biography which had formed by mid nineteenth century reflected a breach between high culture and middle-class culture. This division would endure for the remainder of the century. Biography began to flower thanks to new publishing technologies and an expanding reading public. This revolution in publishing made books available to a larger audience of readers. Almost ten times as many American biographies appeared from 1840 to 1860 than had appeared in the first two decades of the century. In addition, affordable paperback editions of popular biographies were published for the first time. Also, American periodicals began publishing series of biographical sketches. (Casper, 1999) The topical emphasis shifted from republican heroes to self-made men.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Much of late 19th-century biography remained formulaic. Notably, few autobiographies had been written in the 19th century. The following century witnessed a renaissance of autobiography beginning with [[Booker T. Washington]]'s, ''Up From Slavery'' (1901) and followed by [[Henry Adams]]' ''Education'' (1907), a chronicle of self-defined failure which ran counter to the predominant American success story. The publication of socially significant autobiographies by both men and women began to flourish. (Stone, 1982)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The authority of psychology and sociology was ascendant and would make its mark on the new century’s biographies. (Stone, 1982) The demise of the [[Great Man|"great man"]] theory of history was indicative of the emerging mindset. Human behavior would be explained through Darwinian theories. "Sociological" biographies based their subjects' actions as the result of the environment, and tended to downplay individuality. The development of psychoanalysis led to a more penetrating and comprehensive understanding of the biographical subject, and induced biographers to give more emphasis to childhood and adolescence. Clearly, psychological ideas were changing the way Americans read and wrote biographies, as a culture of autobiography developed in which the telling of one's own story became a form of therapy. (Casper, 1999)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | The conventional concept of national heroes and narratives of success disappeared in the obsession with psychological explorations of personality. The new school of biography featured iconoclasts, scientific analysts, and fictional biographers. This wave included [[Lytton Strachey]], [[André Maurois]], and [[Emil Ludwig]] among others. Strachey's biographies had an influence similar to that which Samuel Johnson had enjoyed earlier. In the 1920s and '30s, biographical writers sought to capitalize on Strachey's popularity and imitate his style. [[Robert Graves]] (''I, Claudius'', 1934) stood out among those following Strachey's model of "debunking biographies." The trend in literary biography was accompanied in popular biography by a sort of "celebrity voyeurism." in the early decades of the century. This latter form's appeal to readers was based on curiosity more than morality or patriotism.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | By World War I, cheap hard-cover reprints had become popular. The decades of the 1920s witnessed a biographical "boom." In 1929, nearly 700 biographies were published in the United States, and the first dictionary of American biography appeared. In the decade that followed, numerous biographies continued to be published despite the economic depression. They reached a growing audience through inexpensive formats and via public libraries.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Women's biographies were revolutionized in the 1970s, according to scholar Carolyn Heilbrun. At this time women began to be portrayed more accurately, even if it downplayed the achievements or integrity of a man (Heilbrun 12). This was in the era of the [[feminist movement]].
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Multi-media forms==
| |
| − | With the technological advancements created in the late 20th and early [[21st century|21st centuries]], multi-media forms of biography became much more popular than literary forms. Visual and film images were able to elaborate new dimensions of personality that written forms could not. The popularity of these forms of biography culminated in the creation of such [[cable]] and [[satellite]] [[television network]]s as [[A&E Network|A&E]], [[Biography Channel|The Biography Channel]], [[History Channel|The History Channel]] and History International. Along with documentary film biographies, [[Hollywood]] produced numerous commercial films based on the lives of famous people.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | More recently, CD-ROM and online biographies are appearing. Unlike books and films, they often do not tell a chronological story; instead, they are archives of many discrete media elements related to an individual person, including video clips, photographs, and text articles. Media scholar Lev Manovich says that such archives exemplify the database form, allowing users to navigate the materials in many ways (Manovich 220).
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==References==
| |
| − | * Casper, Scott E. ''Constructing American Lives: Biography and Culture in Nineteenth-Century America.'' Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1999.
| |
| − | * Heilbrun, Carolyn. ''Writing a Woman's Life.'' New York: Ballantine Books, 1989.
| |
| − | * Manovich, Lev. ''The Language of New Media.'' Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.
| |
| − | * Stone, Albert E. ''Autobiographical Occasions and Original Acts.'' Philadelphia: University of Pennnsylvania Pres, 1982.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | == Further reading ==
| |
| − | *Ames, Noel. ''These Wonderful People: Intimate Moments in their Lives'', 1947.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ==Book Awards==
| |
| − | Annually, several countries offer their writers a specific prize for writing a biography such as the:
| |
| − | *[[Drainie-Taylor Biography Prize]] – Canada
| |
| − | *[[National Biography Award]] – Australia
| |
| − | *[[Pulitzer Prize for Biography or Autobiography]] – United States
| |
| − | *[[Whitbread Prize for Best Biography]] – United Kingdom
| |
| − | *[[J. R. Ackerley Prize for Autobiography]] – United Kingdom
| |
| | | | |
| | | | |
