Medieval Philosophy

From Nordan Symposia
Revision as of 05:10, 19 August 2007 by Rdavis (talk | contribs) (New page: '''Medieval philosophy''' is the philosophy of Europe and the Middle East in the era now known as medieval or the Middle Ages, the period roughly extending from the fall of the...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigationJump to search

Medieval philosophy is the philosophy of Europe and the Middle East in the era now known as medieval or the Middle Ages, the period roughly extending from the fall of the Roman Empire to the Renaissance. It is defined partly by the process of rediscovering the ancient culture developed in Greece and Rome in the classical period, and partly by the need to address theological problems and to integrate sacred doctrine and secular learning.

The problems discussed throughout this period are the relation of faith to reason, the existence and unity of God, the object of theology and metaphysics, and the problems of knowledge, of universals, and of individuation.

Character of medieval philosophy

The medieval era was disparagingly treated by the Renaissance humanists, who saw it as a barbaric 'middle' period between the classical age of Greek and Roman culture, and the 'rebirth' or renaissance of classical culture. Yet this period of nearly a thousand years was the longest period of philosophical development in Europe and the Middle East, and possibly the richest. Jorge Gracia has argued that 'in intensity, sophistication, and achievement, the philosophical flowering in the thirteenth century could be rightly said to rival the golden age of Greek philosophy in the fourth century B.C.' (Gracia, p. 1).

Medieval philosophy is characteristically theological due to one of the heavily debated topics of that age: faith vs. reason. Avicenna and Averroes both leaned more on the side of reason. Augustine and Anselm both believed in the primacy of faith. The Augustinian solution to the faith/reason problem is to (1) believe, and then (2) seek to understand. Thus, we do find plenty of philosophy in the works of medieval writers, who used the ideas and logical techniques of the ancient philosophers to address difficult theological questions and points of doctrine. Thomas Aquinas sought a harmony of both faith and reason. While some regard him as strictly a theologian, others disagree. He called philosophy ancilla theologiae, the handmaiden of theology. On the other hand, he also says that theology is the guidepost of philosophy. He writes that philosophy and theology are in harmony because both are created by God. If one's philosophy conflicts with the theology, then a mistake was made. That philosopher must go back and seek out his or her error. Thus, he admits a reciprocal relationship between philosophy and theology.[1]

Generally speaking, there are three features that characterise medieval thinking. (1) The use of logic, dialectic and analysis to discover the truth – the principle of reasoned argumentation or ratio. (2) Respect for the insights of ancient philosophers, particularly Aristotle, and deference to their authority – the principle of auctoritas. (3) The obligation to co-ordinate the insights of philosophy with theological teaching and revelation – the principle of concordia. The last was the most important. Perhaps no other issue concerned medieval thinkers more than the relation of faith to reason.

Historical Background

Islamic philosophy in the Middle Ages

Template:Main

File:Plato Seneca Aristotle medieval.jpg
Plato, Seneca, and Aristotle from a medieval manuscript, Devotional and Philosophical Writings, c. 1330

Whereas Judaism and Christianity began as a religion of small groups, Islam developed as the religion of an expanding empire. Within a hundred years of Mohammed's death in 632 AD, military conquest extended the Islamic world to India, North Africa and Southern Spain.

As a result, a variety of different communities came under Muslim rule, and Islam came into contact with the theological systems of Judaism, Christianity, and Zoroastranism, and the philosophy of India and Greece. This led Islamic theologians to use philosophical ideas and principles to interpret Koranic doctrines.

The first stage of this process was the translation into Arabic of Greek philosophical and scientific works that had been preserved by Eastern Christians in Mesopatamia, Syria and Egypt. The translators were mostly Nestorian and Jacobite Christians, working in the two hundred years following the early Abbasid period (c. 800). The most important translator of this group was the Syriac-speaking Christian Hunayn Ibn Ishaq (809-873), known to the Latins as Joannitius. The texts were first translated into Syriac, then into Arabic. Despite this process, the translations were generally accurate, aiming for a literal reading rather than elegance.

In the tenth century another school arose among the Jacobites. These knew little Greek, and used only Syriac translations. The works translated included nearly all the works of Aristotle, the writings of commentators such as Alexander of Aphrodisias, Themistius and Theophrastus, most of the dialogues of Plato, and some Neoplatonist works.

The next stage was the development of Islamic theology by the Mutakallimun. These were divided into the Mu'tazilites and the Ash'arites. The Mu'tazilites originated in groups that met in Basrah and Baghdad to discuss how Greek philosophical ideas might help to resolve certain theological problems, such as divine unity, and how human beings can be free even though God is omnipotent. They also developed proofs of the creation of the world, using Christian Neoplatonist ideas. The Ash'arites (founded by Al-Ash'ari, 873-935) tried to clarify Koranic doctrines. They denied the existence of any causation except through God, and therefore denied the freedom of human will. Why does anything happen? 'God wills it'.

Al-Kindi (801–873) is generally regarded as the first Aristotelian philosopher. He advocated the independent study of philosophy, and also wrote on science and logic. Al-Razi (865- c. 925), by contrast, defended Plato against Aristotle, who he regarded a corrupter of philosophy. Aristotelianism continued with Al-Farabi (870-930) and Ibn Sina, known to the Latins as Avicenna (980-1037). The Ash'arite theologian Al-Ghazali (1058-1111), by contrast, represents Islamic reaction to Aristotle. Ghazali bitterly denounced Aristotle, Socrates and other Greek writers as non-believers and labelled those who employed their methods and ideas as corrupters of the Islamic faith.

Islamic Aristotelianism reached its height with Ibn Rushd, known to the Latin as Averroes, best known in the West for his commentaries on Aristotle. Hebrew translations of his work also had a lasting impact on Jewish philosophy.

Early Medieval Christian Philosophy

Template:Main Template:Sectstub

High Middle Ages

Template:Main Template:Sectstub

See also

Further reading

External links

  1. Ettienne Gilson, Reason and Revelation in the Middle Ages.