Quality

From DaynalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Lighterstill.jpg
BrilliantQuality.jpg

Definition

  1. [n] a degree or grade of excellence or worth; "the quality of students has risen"; "an executive of low caliber"
  2. [n] the distinctive property of a complex sound (a voice or noise or musical sound); "the timbre of her soprano was rich and lovely"; "the muffled tones of the broken bell summoned them to meet"
  3. [n] a characteristic property that defines the apparent individual nature of something; "each town has a quality all its own"; "the radical character of our demands"
  4. [n] high social status; "a man of quality"
  5. [adj] of high social status; "people of quality"; "a quality family"
  6. [adj] of superior grade; "choice wines"; "prime beef"; "prize carnations"; "quality paper"; "select peaches"

For lessons on the related topic of Value, follow this link.

Philosophy

A quality (from Lat. qualitas(Morwood¹, 1995) is an attribute or a property. Attributes are ascribable, by a subject, whereas properties are possessible(Cargile², 1995). Some philosophers assert that a quality cannot be defined Metaphysics of Quality³. In contemporary philosophy, the idea of qualities and especially how to distinguish certain kinds of qualities from one another remains controversial.(Cargile², 1995)

Background

Aristotle presented his idea of qualities in his Categories. According to him, qualities may be attributed to things and persons or be possessed by them. There are four Aristotelian qualities: habits and dispositions, natural capabilities and incapabilities, affective qualities and affections, and shape. (Studtmann⁴, 2007)

Locke presented a distinction between primary and secondary qualities in his An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. For Locke, a quality is an idea of a sensation or a perception. Locke further asserts that qualities can be divided in two kinds: primary and secondary qualities. Primary qualities are intrinsic to an object—a thing or a person—whereas secondary qualities are dependent on the interpretation of the subjective mode and the context of appearance. (Cargile², 1995) For example, a shadow is a secondary quality. It requires a certain lighting to be attributable to an object. For another example, consider the mass of an object. It is intrinsic to the object because the mass of an object relates directly to the amount and type of atoms it contains and is therefore a primary quality. Newton's law of universal gravitation states that the weight of an object is dictated by the attraction of the Earth to said collection of atoms and is therefore dependent on distance from the Earth thus making it a secondary quality.

A Post-Pragmatistic Conception of Quality

Philosophy and common sense tend to see Quality as related either to subjective feelings or to objective facts. The subject-object in question might be

  • a concrete and functional (e.g. Aristotelian) value to be learnt and applied (a and b), or
  • a psychic (e.g. platonic) ideal to be apprehended and represented (c).
  • A third view tends to see Quality not as a secondary value that something has, rather a primary truth which comprises apparent subjects and objects (d).

So the Quality of something depends on the criteria being applied to it. From the neutral point of view, the Quality of something is simply the inseparable sum of its essential attributes or properties and the Quality of something does not determine its value (the philosophical or economic value).

Subjectively, something might be good because it is useful, because it is beautiful, or simply because it exists. Determining or finding Quality therefore involves an understanding of use, beauty and existence - what is useful, what is beautiful and what exists. The usefulness aspect is reflected in the common usage of quality.

Robert M. Pirsig, in his book Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance, studies the Metaphysics of Quality, and examines the distinctions and relationship between classical and romantic quality, seeking to reconcile the two views and understand how they stand in relationship to each other.

In this context the two aspects of classical object-oriented and romantic subject-oriented quality roughly parallel aesthetic quality and functional quality. The resolution of the book points to a view of quality which relegates this subject-object dualism to a product of a non-dualistic absolute.

References

  1. Morwood, 1995
  2. Cargile, 1995
  3. Metaphysics of Quality
  4. Studtmann, 2007

Morwood, J. (Ed.) (1995). The Pocket Oxford Latin Dictionary. Oxford.

Cargile, J. (1995). qualities. in Honderich, T. (Ed.) (2005). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy (2nd ed.). Oxford.

Studtmann, P. (2007). Aristotle's Categories. in Zalta, E. N. (Ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2008). [1]