Difference between revisions of "Talk:Daniel Raphael"

From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 8: Line 8:
 
*4. He has spiritual beings citing amorality of their protocols as a virtue.[http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2014-04-25-New_Era_Conversations_20#Dialogue NEC 20]
 
*4. He has spiritual beings citing amorality of their protocols as a virtue.[http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2014-04-25-New_Era_Conversations_20#Dialogue NEC 20]
 
*5. He cites the virtue of profit driven [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence AI] to guide human moral choice.[http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2018-12-18-New_Era_Transition_53 NET 53]
 
*5. He cites the virtue of profit driven [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence AI] to guide human moral choice.[http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2018-12-18-New_Era_Transition_53 NET 53]
 
Of course, those who have found God within them hear at minimum the echo of his voice in everything around them. Nevertheless, some echoes are so distorted as to be problematic. --rdavis 19:01, 4 November 2018 (UTC)
 

Revision as of 18:20, 10 January 2020

Lighterstill.jpg

Among the many objections to Daniel Raphael's work are:

  • 1. He cites academic authority using a bogus Ph.D.
  • 2. His work parrots Neo Conservative US foreign policy. NEC 7NEC 8
  • 3. He cites the Rothschild family as an illustration of social sustainability. NEC 9
  • 4. He has spiritual beings citing amorality of their protocols as a virtue.NEC 20
  • 5. He cites the virtue of profit driven AI to guide human moral choice.NET 53