Changes

no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
[[Image:lighterstill.jpg]]
 
[[Image:lighterstill.jpg]]
   −
'''Author's Introductory Comments'''
+
==Author's Introductory Comments==
    
We tend to look at the master universe as a "going concern," as something that has been here for a long time and is going to be here for a long time. This is a very legitimate way of looking at the master universe; it is a durable creation. At its center is the stationary Isle and the universe of eternal perfection. We live on the outer edge of one of the encircling superuniverses that is slowly evolving in the direction of perfection. Out beyond us, in the outer space regions, are the new universes of the future ages - large physical creations that are being organized for the developments of the future ages. Still farther out, in the more remote regions of outer space, physical creation begins to taper off until finally there is nothing but the quietness of empty space in the outermost reaches of the master creation.
 
We tend to look at the master universe as a "going concern," as something that has been here for a long time and is going to be here for a long time. This is a very legitimate way of looking at the master universe; it is a durable creation. At its center is the stationary Isle and the universe of eternal perfection. We live on the outer edge of one of the encircling superuniverses that is slowly evolving in the direction of perfection. Out beyond us, in the outer space regions, are the new universes of the future ages - large physical creations that are being organized for the developments of the future ages. Still farther out, in the more remote regions of outer space, physical creation begins to taper off until finally there is nothing but the quietness of empty space in the outermost reaches of the master creation.
Line 22: Line 22:       −
==THE FIRST UNIVERSE AGE==
+
==§1.THE FIRST UNIVERSE AGE==
    
If we stay with factual reality, no matter how far back in time we try to think, the innermost core of the master universe - the central and divine universe - is always there; it is eternal.(152,1)  This pattern creation of divine perfection is just as eternal as the Infinite Spirit, the Third Person of Deity. (91,5 and 7)  It eternalizes by the will of the Father-Son through the agency of the God of Action, the Infinite Spirit (91,1), who eternalizes at the same time as the appearance of this central creation. (91,5)
 
If we stay with factual reality, no matter how far back in time we try to think, the innermost core of the master universe - the central and divine universe - is always there; it is eternal.(152,1)  This pattern creation of divine perfection is just as eternal as the Infinite Spirit, the Third Person of Deity. (91,5 and 7)  It eternalizes by the will of the Father-Son through the agency of the God of Action, the Infinite Spirit (91,1), who eternalizes at the same time as the appearance of this central creation. (91,5)
Line 76: Line 76:       −
==SOURCE RELATIONSHIPS IN ETERNITY==
+
==§2. SOURCE RELATIONSHIPS IN ETERNITY==
    
There are degrees of source relationship between eternal realities that are paradoxical when viewed from our time perspective. We are prone to say, "If these eternal realities had come into existence in time, then that which is Source must be older than that which is Derived." If we could entertain the concept of a Zero Age - an age prior to the First Universe Age - then we would have a perspective from which we might attempt to analyze certain of these relationships. (The concept of a Zero Age is the concept of a state of affairs prior to the existence of the Spirit, Havona, and the Trinity.) In making a comparison of that which is Source with that which is Derived, we encounter three degrees of source relationship between eternal realities:
 
There are degrees of source relationship between eternal realities that are paradoxical when viewed from our time perspective. We are prone to say, "If these eternal realities had come into existence in time, then that which is Source must be older than that which is Derived." If we could entertain the concept of a Zero Age - an age prior to the First Universe Age - then we would have a perspective from which we might attempt to analyze certain of these relationships. (The concept of a Zero Age is the concept of a state of affairs prior to the existence of the Spirit, Havona, and the Trinity.) In making a comparison of that which is Source with that which is Derived, we encounter three degrees of source relationship between eternal realities:
Line 89: Line 89:       −
==THE ZERO AGE==
+
==§3. THE ZERO AGE==
    
We might try to improve our concept of the Zero Age by otherwise naming it "the first pre-universe age." As we enter this hypothetical age we are leaving factual reality behind us, but we are not separating ourselves from valid concept. As we take inventory of the contents of the Zero Age, we should first make note of the absence of the Paradise Trinity, the Infinite Spirit, and the central universe. The Zero Age concept is pre-Spirit, hence pre-Havona; and, without the Spirit, there is no Trinity. In the Zero Age we find the following realities:
 
We might try to improve our concept of the Zero Age by otherwise naming it "the first pre-universe age." As we enter this hypothetical age we are leaving factual reality behind us, but we are not separating ourselves from valid concept. As we take inventory of the contents of the Zero Age, we should first make note of the absence of the Paradise Trinity, the Infinite Spirit, and the central universe. The Zero Age concept is pre-Spirit, hence pre-Havona; and, without the Spirit, there is no Trinity. In the Zero Age we find the following realities:
Line 116: Line 116:       −
==THE PRE-ZERO CONCEPT==
+
==§4. THE PRE-ZERO CONCEPT==
    
We might think of the Pre-Zero concept as "the second pre-universe age." In this concept we are departing still farther from factual reality. Nevertheless, let us again take inventory of what is in existence; but first, we should make note of the absence of the Eternal Son and the Isle of Paradise. In the Pre-Zero concept we find the following realities:
 
We might think of the Pre-Zero concept as "the second pre-universe age." In this concept we are departing still farther from factual reality. Nevertheless, let us again take inventory of what is in existence; but first, we should make note of the absence of the Eternal Son and the Isle of Paradise. In the Pre-Zero concept we find the following realities:
Line 131: Line 131:       −
==BEFORE PRE-ZERO==
+
==§5. BEFORE PRE-ZERO==
    
We can take at least one more step in the exploration of the "historic past" of past eternity; we can make an effort to visualize a concept that is Before Pre-Zero, a hypothetical "third pre-universe age." The Urantia Papers do provide us with such a starting point; they refer to it as the "hypothetical static moment of eternity." (1153,3) Here we encounter a concept that presents a state of affairs prior to the separation of the deified and the non deified. But, even in this primal concept the Urantia Papers do not validate monism - "The doctrine that there is only one kind of substance or ultimate reality." (Webster) The Urantia Papers do not validate the concept of absolute uniformity at the very beginning of all things. The Urantia Papers insist that this concept of past-eternal reality must include the potential (the possibility for the expression) of self-will. (6,2), (1152, §1), (1152, §2)
 
We can take at least one more step in the exploration of the "historic past" of past eternity; we can make an effort to visualize a concept that is Before Pre-Zero, a hypothetical "third pre-universe age." The Urantia Papers do provide us with such a starting point; they refer to it as the "hypothetical static moment of eternity." (1153,3) Here we encounter a concept that presents a state of affairs prior to the separation of the deified and the non deified. But, even in this primal concept the Urantia Papers do not validate monism - "The doctrine that there is only one kind of substance or ultimate reality." (Webster) The Urantia Papers do not validate the concept of absolute uniformity at the very beginning of all things. The Urantia Papers insist that this concept of past-eternal reality must include the potential (the possibility for the expression) of self-will. (6,2), (1152, §1), (1152, §2)
Line 140: Line 140:       −
==FOOTNOTE: REVERSIBLE SEQUENCE IN ETERNITY==
+
==§6. FOOTNOTE: REVERSIBLE SEQUENCE IN ETERNITY==
    
In our exploration of the antecedents of the master universe we have followed the conventional sequence of events that is several times presented in the Urantia Papers. (6,2-3),  (1154,3-4) In this narrative the pre-Father emerges from the Absolute, leaving as residue the Unqualified Absolute, and then unifies the emerged presence of Total Deity (Qualified Absolute) with the Unqualified by the action of the Universal Absolute. The pre-Father then gives dual expression to Paradise and the Eternal Son; and now as the Father, joins with the Son to trinitize the Spirit; unites with the Son and Spirit as the Trinity; and replaces his former presence in Total Deity with the presence of the Paradise Trinity.
 
In our exploration of the antecedents of the master universe we have followed the conventional sequence of events that is several times presented in the Urantia Papers. (6,2-3),  (1154,3-4) In this narrative the pre-Father emerges from the Absolute, leaving as residue the Unqualified Absolute, and then unifies the emerged presence of Total Deity (Qualified Absolute) with the Unqualified by the action of the Universal Absolute. The pre-Father then gives dual expression to Paradise and the Eternal Son; and now as the Father, joins with the Son to trinitize the Spirit; unites with the Son and Spirit as the Trinity; and replaces his former presence in Total Deity with the presence of the Paradise Trinity.