Difference between revisions of "Relative"
From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 5: | Line 5: | ||
This relational and subject-oriented view of [[knowledge]] is an alternative to the [[objectivist]] [[truth]]-based view common in [[logic]]. | This relational and subject-oriented view of [[knowledge]] is an alternative to the [[objectivist]] [[truth]]-based view common in [[logic]]. | ||
+ | |||
<center>For lessons on the [[topic]] of [[Relativity]], follow [http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Category:Relativity this link].</center> | <center>For lessons on the [[topic]] of [[Relativity]], follow [http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Category:Relativity this link].</center> |
Revision as of 15:12, 27 August 2009
In philosophy, knowledge relativity is the notion that knowledge can be seen as the relation between a form of representation with up to two sorts of intent – communication and use goals – and with up to three subjects – one who knows, one who is informed, and one who observes and confirms.
This relational and subject-oriented view of knowledge is an alternative to the objectivist truth-based view common in logic.
When we attempt to conceive of perfection in all phases and forms of relativity, we encounter seven conceivable types:
- Absolute perfection in all aspects.
- Absolute perfection in some phases and relative perfection in all other aspects.
- Absolute, relative, and imperfect aspects in varied association.
- Absolute perfection in some respects, imperfection in all others.
- Absolute perfection in no direction, relative perfection in all manifestations.
- Absolute perfection in no phase, relative in some, imperfect in others.
- Absolute perfection in no attribute, imperfection in all. [1]
See Also
External link
- An introduction to knowledge relativity by Oliver Hoffmann of University of South Australia