Line 34: |
Line 34: |
| Tomas, do you have words to add to my [[commentary]] before we open up the floor? | | Tomas, do you have words to add to my [[commentary]] before we open up the floor? |
| ===='''''[[Connectedness]]''''', '''''[[Circuits]]'''''==== | | ===='''''[[Connectedness]]''''', '''''[[Circuits]]'''''==== |
− | TOMAS: (TR#2) Gracious Teacher, indeed I have [[words]], however brief, for I do not wish to detract from the [[clarity]] of your missive this evening. I do however which to address briefly what [[synergy]] is not, lest in your beholding you negate the [[power]] and [[potential]] of this very keen [[circuit]] of [[energy]]. | + | TOMAS: (TR#2) Gracious Teacher, indeed I have [[words]], however brief, for I do not wish to detract from the [[clarity]] of your missive this evening. I do however wish to address briefly what [[synergy]] is not, lest in your beholding you negate the [[power]] and [[potential]] of this very keen [[circuit]] of [[energy]]. |
| | | |
| The [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recovery_model recovery movement which] is making great inroads into helping [[individuals]] become socially acquainted with a [[personal]] [[God]], has dealt largely with [[mortal]] matters. The [[spirituality]] which is emerging will be [[evidenced]] through synergy as it evolves and is realized. Yet it could be easily construed at this [[point]] to be an emotional [[connectedness]] or [[interdependence]] or co-dependence, which phrases are popular and useful in [[communication]] terms. These communication terms, however valuable and useful, are not the equivalent of [[synergy]] which is a [[transcendence]] of [[emotional]] [[circuitry]] and [[social]] [[circuitry]]. | | The [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recovery_model recovery movement which] is making great inroads into helping [[individuals]] become socially acquainted with a [[personal]] [[God]], has dealt largely with [[mortal]] matters. The [[spirituality]] which is emerging will be [[evidenced]] through synergy as it evolves and is realized. Yet it could be easily construed at this [[point]] to be an emotional [[connectedness]] or [[interdependence]] or co-dependence, which phrases are popular and useful in [[communication]] terms. These communication terms, however valuable and useful, are not the equivalent of [[synergy]] which is a [[transcendence]] of [[emotional]] [[circuitry]] and [[social]] [[circuitry]]. |
Line 43: |
Line 43: |
| | | |
| DANIEL: Thank you, Tomas, for your additions and [[clarifications]]. And now, [[friends]], we would very much like to hear from you. | | DANIEL: Thank you, Tomas, for your additions and [[clarifications]]. And now, [[friends]], we would very much like to hear from you. |
| + | |
| ===Dialogue=== | | ===Dialogue=== |
| TONYA: I'm afraid I'm still a little [[confused]]. Is it sending through your [[mind]] and through your [[quietness]]? Is it in sending [[love]] to another [[person]]? Is it a link that is easier made in [[intimacy]] or with someone that you know well initially before one is capable to send it to someone that they do not know well? I feel I'm very lost, perhaps. | | TONYA: I'm afraid I'm still a little [[confused]]. Is it sending through your [[mind]] and through your [[quietness]]? Is it in sending [[love]] to another [[person]]? Is it a link that is easier made in [[intimacy]] or with someone that you know well initially before one is capable to send it to someone that they do not know well? I feel I'm very lost, perhaps. |