103,025
edits
Changes
no edit summary
If you don't mind, given the preponderance of Alkon in the record, I have created pages for both Alcon and Alkon pointing to the same collection of lessons. To share the full beauty of this human dimension of apparent uncertainty, I have added this correspondence to the discussion page of each page devoted to their names. Let me know if you have any objections.
If you don't mind, given the preponderance of Alkon in the record, I have created pages for both Alcon and Alkon pointing to the same collection of lessons. To share the full beauty of this human dimension of apparent uncertainty, I have added this correspondence to the discussion page of each page devoted to their names. Let me know if you have any objections.
Gratefully,
Rob
----
Nancy wrote: April 18, 2012 11:58:19 AM CDT
Hi Rob, that works—or, given the preponderance of the use of “Alkon” you could just make the change. I think the use of “Alcon” was a misspelling. Nancy
Nancy wrote: April 18, 2012 12:01:31 PM CDT
Follow-on thought….
The use of “Alcon” probably occurred when someone other than my Dad or I did the transcribing and is simply a misspelling. I think the references should all be chanted to “Alkon.”
Nancy
----
Rob wrote: April 18, 2012 2:04 PM CDT
Hello Nancy,
Thank you for giving this some further thought!
With your approval, I could simply delete the Alcon page (along with its discussion) and leave the Alkon page with its discussion page updated with this correspondence. That way, future examinations of this collection can find the reference to Alcon as a sign of our efforts to address the question.
Gratefully,
Gratefully,
Rob
Rob