Changes

From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to search
72 bytes added ,  00:48, 13 December 2020
m
Text replacement - "http://" to "https://"
Line 2: Line 2:     
'''Everything''' is all that [[exists]].[1] Every object and entity is a part of everything, including all [[physical]] bodies and in some cases all abstract objects. Everything is generally defined as the opposite of [[absence|nothing]], although an alternative view considers "nothing" a part of everything.
 
'''Everything''' is all that [[exists]].[1] Every object and entity is a part of everything, including all [[physical]] bodies and in some cases all abstract objects. Everything is generally defined as the opposite of [[absence|nothing]], although an alternative view considers "nothing" a part of everything.
 +
<center>For lessons on "'''''everything'''''", follow [https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Category:Topics '''''this link'''''].</center>
 
==Scope==
 
==Scope==
 
In ordinary [[conversation]], everything usually refers only to the totality of [[things]] relevant to the subject [[matter]].[1] When there is no expressed limitation, everything may refer to the [[universe]] or the world.
 
In ordinary [[conversation]], everything usually refers only to the totality of [[things]] relevant to the subject [[matter]].[1] When there is no expressed limitation, everything may refer to the [[universe]] or the world.
Line 8: Line 9:  
Especially in a metaphysical context, World may refer to everything that constitutes [[reality]] and the [[Universe]]: see World (philosophy). However, world may "only" refer to [[Earth]] envisioned from an anthropocentric or human [[worldview]], as a place inhabited by [[human being]]s. It is often used to signify the sum of human [[experience]] and [[history]], or the "[[human condition]]" in general.[2]
 
Especially in a metaphysical context, World may refer to everything that constitutes [[reality]] and the [[Universe]]: see World (philosophy). However, world may "only" refer to [[Earth]] envisioned from an anthropocentric or human [[worldview]], as a place inhabited by [[human being]]s. It is often used to signify the sum of human [[experience]] and [[history]], or the "[[human condition]]" in general.[2]
 
==In theoretical physics==
 
==In theoretical physics==
In theoretical physics, a theory of everything ([http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything TOE]) is a hypothetical theory that fully explains and links together all known physical [[phenomena]]. Initially, the term was used with an [[ironic]] connotation to refer to various overgeneralized theories. For example, a great-grandfather of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ijon_Tichy Ijon Tichy] — a character from a cycle of Stanisław Lem's [[science fiction]] stories of 1960s — was known to work on the "General Theory of Everything". Over time, the term stuck in popularizations of quantum [[physics]] to describe a theory that would unify or explain through a single [[model]] the theories of all fundamental interactions of [[nature]].
+
In theoretical physics, a theory of everything ([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_everything TOE]) is a hypothetical theory that fully explains and links together all known physical [[phenomena]]. Initially, the term was used with an [[ironic]] connotation to refer to various overgeneralized theories. For example, a great-grandfather of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ijon_Tichy Ijon Tichy] — a character from a cycle of Stanisław Lem's [[science fiction]] stories of 1960s — was known to work on the "General Theory of Everything". Over time, the term stuck in popularizations of quantum [[physics]] to describe a theory that would unify or explain through a single [[model]] the theories of all fundamental interactions of [[nature]].
    
There have been many theories of everything proposed by theoretical physicists over the last century, but none have been confirmed experimentally. The primary problem in producing a TOE is that the accepted theories of [[quantum mechanics]] and [[Relativity|general relativity]] are hard to combine.
 
There have been many theories of everything proposed by theoretical physicists over the last century, but none have been confirmed experimentally. The primary problem in producing a TOE is that the accepted theories of [[quantum mechanics]] and [[Relativity|general relativity]] are hard to combine.
   −
Based on theoretical [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_principle holographic principle] [[arguments]] from the 1990s, many physicists believe that 11-dimensional M-theory, which is described in many sectors by matrix [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superstring_theory string theory], and in many other sectors by perturbative string theory, is the complete theory of everything. Other physicists disagree.
+
Based on theoretical [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holographic_principle holographic principle] [[arguments]] from the 1990s, many physicists believe that 11-dimensional M-theory, which is described in many sectors by matrix [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superstring_theory string theory], and in many other sectors by perturbative string theory, is the complete theory of everything. Other physicists disagree.
 
==In philosophy==
 
==In philosophy==
 
In philosophy, a theory of everything or TOE is an ultimate, all-encompassing explanation of nature or reality.[3][4][5] Adopting the term from [[physics]], where the search for a theory of everything is ongoing, philosophers have discussed the viability of the [[concept]] and [[analyzed]] its properties and implications.[3][4][5] Among the questions to be addressed by a philosophical theory of everything are: "Why is reality understandable?" "Why are the laws of nature as they are?" "Why is there anything at all?"[3]
 
In philosophy, a theory of everything or TOE is an ultimate, all-encompassing explanation of nature or reality.[3][4][5] Adopting the term from [[physics]], where the search for a theory of everything is ongoing, philosophers have discussed the viability of the [[concept]] and [[analyzed]] its properties and implications.[3][4][5] Among the questions to be addressed by a philosophical theory of everything are: "Why is reality understandable?" "Why are the laws of nature as they are?" "Why is there anything at all?"[3]
 
==Quote==
 
==Quote==
At one time or another [[mortal]] man has [[worship]]ed everything on the face of the [[earth]], including himself. He has also worshiped about everything imaginable in the sky and beneath the surface of the earth. Primitive man feared all [[manifestations]] of [[power]]; he worshiped every [[natural]] [[phenomenon]] he could not comprehend. The observation of powerful natural forces, such as storms, floods, earthquakes, landslides, volcanoes, fire, heat, and cold, greatly impressed the expanding [[mind]] of man. The [[Mystery|inexplicable]] [[things]] of life are still termed "[[acts]] of [[God]]" and "mysterious dispensations of [[Providence]]."[http://www.urantia.org/cgi-bin/webglimpse/mfs/usr/local/www/data/papers?link=http://mercy.urantia.org/papers/paper85.html&file=/usr/local/www/data/papers/paper85.html&line=30#mfs]
+
At one time or another [[mortal]] man has [[worship]]ed '''everything''' on the face of the [[earth]], including himself. He has also worshiped about everything imaginable in the sky and beneath the surface of the earth. Primitive man feared all [[manifestations]] of [[power]]; he worshiped every [[natural]] [[phenomenon]] he could not comprehend. The observation of powerful natural forces, such as storms, floods, earthquakes, landslides, volcanoes, fire, heat, and cold, greatly impressed the expanding [[mind]] of man. The [[Mystery|inexplicable]] [[things]] of life are still termed "[[acts]] of [[God]]" and "mysterious dispensations of [[Providence]]."[https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Paper_85#PAPER_85:_THE_ORIGINS_OF_WORSHIP]
    
==Further reading==
 
==Further reading==
*Church Dogmatics III/3, pp. 389–368, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Barth Karl Barth]
+
*Church Dogmatics III/3, pp. 389–368, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Barth Karl Barth]
*[http://www.pentapublishing.com/ In Search of a Cyclops], Fredrick Schermer
+
*[https://www.pentapublishing.com/ In Search of a Cyclops], Fredrick Schermer
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_Bergson Creative Evolution, Henri Bergson], Chapter IV
+
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henri_Bergson Creative Evolution, Henri Bergson], Chapter IV
    
==References==
 
==References==

Navigation menu