Changes

From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to search
171 bytes added ,  23:48, 16 November 2009
no edit summary
Line 14: Line 14:     
*3. Fallacious, delusive. Obs. rare.
 
*3. Fallacious, delusive. Obs. rare.
 +
 +
----
 +
<center>For lessons on the [[topic]] of '''''Fallibility''''', follow [http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Category:Fallibility this link].</center>
 +
----
 +
 
==Description==
 
==Description==
 
Fallibilism is the philosophical doctrine that all claims of [[knowledge]] could, in principle, be mistaken. Some fallibilists go further, arguing that absolute certainty about [[knowledge]] is impossible. As a [[formal]] [[doctrine]], it is most strongly associated with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Sanders_Peirce Charles Sanders Peirce], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Dewey John Dewey], and other pragmatists, who use it in their attacks on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundationalism foundationalism]. However, it is arguably already present in the views of some ancient philosophers, including Xenophanes, [[Socrates]], and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato Plato]. Another proponent of fallibilism is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Popper Karl Popper], who builds his theory of [[knowledge]], critical rationalism, on fallibilistic presuppositions. Fallibilism has been employed by Willard Van Orman Quine to attack, among other [[things]], the distinction between analytic and synthetic statements. Fallibilism has also been employed by [[George Soros]] to refute the assumptions of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_choice_theory rational choice theory] which is widely used by economists for the understanding and [[modeling]] of [[economic]] [[behavior]].
 
Fallibilism is the philosophical doctrine that all claims of [[knowledge]] could, in principle, be mistaken. Some fallibilists go further, arguing that absolute certainty about [[knowledge]] is impossible. As a [[formal]] [[doctrine]], it is most strongly associated with [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Sanders_Peirce Charles Sanders Peirce], [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Dewey John Dewey], and other pragmatists, who use it in their attacks on [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundationalism foundationalism]. However, it is arguably already present in the views of some ancient philosophers, including Xenophanes, [[Socrates]], and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plato Plato]. Another proponent of fallibilism is [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karl_Popper Karl Popper], who builds his theory of [[knowledge]], critical rationalism, on fallibilistic presuppositions. Fallibilism has been employed by Willard Van Orman Quine to attack, among other [[things]], the distinction between analytic and synthetic statements. Fallibilism has also been employed by [[George Soros]] to refute the assumptions of [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rational_choice_theory rational choice theory] which is widely used by economists for the understanding and [[modeling]] of [[economic]] [[behavior]].

Navigation menu