Difference between revisions of "Nurture"

From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Text replacement - "http://nordan.daynal.org" to "https://nordan.daynal.org")
m (Text replacement - "http://" to "https://")
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
==Origin==
 
==Origin==
 
[https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=English#ca._1100-1500_.09THE_MIDDLE_ENGLISH_PERIOD Middle English] ''norture'', ''nurture'', from Anglo-French ''nureture'', from Late Latin ''nutritura'' act of nursing, from [[Latin]] ''nutritus'', past participle of ''nutrire'' to suckle, [[nourish]]  
 
[https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=English#ca._1100-1500_.09THE_MIDDLE_ENGLISH_PERIOD Middle English] ''norture'', ''nurture'', from Anglo-French ''nureture'', from Late Latin ''nutritura'' act of nursing, from [[Latin]] ''nutritus'', past participle of ''nutrire'' to suckle, [[nourish]]  
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/14th_century 14th Century]
+
*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/14th_century 14th Century]
 
==Definitions==
 
==Definitions==
 
*1: training, upbringing
 
*1: training, upbringing
Line 10: Line 10:
 
==Description==
 
==Description==
 
<center>For lessons on the [[topic]] of '''''Nurture''''', follow [https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Category:Nurture '''''this lesson'''''].</center>
 
<center>For lessons on the [[topic]] of '''''Nurture''''', follow [https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Category:Nurture '''''this lesson'''''].</center>
The [[nature]] versus '''nurture''' debate concerns the [[relative]] importance of an [[individual]]'s innate qualities ("nature," i.e. nativism, or innatism) versus [[personal]] [[experiences]] ("nurture," i.e. [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empiricism empiricism] or [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behaviorism behaviorism]) in determining or causing [[individual]] differences in [[physical]] and behavioral traits.
+
The [[nature]] versus '''nurture''' debate concerns the [[relative]] importance of an [[individual]]'s innate qualities ("nature," i.e. nativism, or innatism) versus [[personal]] [[experiences]] ("nurture," i.e. [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empiricism empiricism] or [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behaviorism behaviorism]) in determining or causing [[individual]] differences in [[physical]] and behavioral traits.
  
The phrase "Nature versus nurture" in its [[modern]] sense was coined by the English Victorian polymath [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Galton Francis Galton] in [[discussion]] of the [[influence]] of [[heredity]] and [[environment]] on social advancement, although the terms had been [[contrasted]] previously, for example by Shakespeare (in his play, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tempest ''The Tempest: 4.1'']). Galton was influenced by the book [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Origin_of_Species On the Origin of Species] written by his cousin, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin Charles Darwin]. The [[concept]] embodied in the phrase has been criticized for its binary simplification of two tightly interwoven [[parameters]], as for example an [[environment]] of [[wealth]], education and social [[privilege]] are often historically passed to genetic offspring.
+
The phrase "Nature versus nurture" in its [[modern]] sense was coined by the English Victorian polymath [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Galton Francis Galton] in [[discussion]] of the [[influence]] of [[heredity]] and [[environment]] on social advancement, although the terms had been [[contrasted]] previously, for example by Shakespeare (in his play, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Tempest ''The Tempest: 4.1'']). Galton was influenced by the book [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Origin_of_Species On the Origin of Species] written by his cousin, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin Charles Darwin]. The [[concept]] embodied in the phrase has been criticized for its binary simplification of two tightly interwoven [[parameters]], as for example an [[environment]] of [[wealth]], education and social [[privilege]] are often historically passed to genetic offspring.
  
The view that humans acquire all or almost all their [[behavioral]] traits from "nurture" was termed by philosopher [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Locke John Locke] ''tabula rasa'' ("blank slate") and proposes that humans [[develop]] from only [[environmental]] [[influences]]. This question was once considered to be an appropriate division of [[developmental]] influences, but since both [[types]] of factors are known to play such interacting roles in development, most modern [[psychologists]] and [[anthropologists]] consider the question [[naive]]—representing an outdated state of [[knowledge]].
+
The view that humans acquire all or almost all their [[behavioral]] traits from "nurture" was termed by philosopher [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Locke John Locke] ''tabula rasa'' ("blank slate") and proposes that humans [[develop]] from only [[environmental]] [[influences]]. This question was once considered to be an appropriate division of [[developmental]] influences, but since both [[types]] of factors are known to play such interacting roles in development, most modern [[psychologists]] and [[anthropologists]] consider the question [[naive]]—representing an outdated state of [[knowledge]].
  
In the social and political sciences, the ''nature versus nurture debate'' may be contrasted with the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structure_and_agency structure versus agency debate] (i.e. socialization versus individual autonomy). [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nurture]
+
In the social and political sciences, the ''nature versus nurture debate'' may be contrasted with the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Structure_and_agency structure versus agency debate] (i.e. socialization versus individual autonomy). [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nurture]
  
 
[[Category: Biology]]
 
[[Category: Biology]]
 
[[Category: Psychology]]
 
[[Category: Psychology]]
 
[[Category: Political Science]]
 
[[Category: Political Science]]

Latest revision as of 00:24, 13 December 2020

Lighterstill.jpg

Nurture-of-bacchus2.jpg

Origin

Middle English norture, nurture, from Anglo-French nureture, from Late Latin nutritura act of nursing, from Latin nutritus, past participle of nutrire to suckle, nourish

Definitions

Description

For lessons on the topic of Nurture, follow this lesson.

The nature versus nurture debate concerns the relative importance of an individual's innate qualities ("nature," i.e. nativism, or innatism) versus personal experiences ("nurture," i.e. empiricism or behaviorism) in determining or causing individual differences in physical and behavioral traits.

The phrase "Nature versus nurture" in its modern sense was coined by the English Victorian polymath Francis Galton in discussion of the influence of heredity and environment on social advancement, although the terms had been contrasted previously, for example by Shakespeare (in his play, The Tempest: 4.1). Galton was influenced by the book On the Origin of Species written by his cousin, Charles Darwin. The concept embodied in the phrase has been criticized for its binary simplification of two tightly interwoven parameters, as for example an environment of wealth, education and social privilege are often historically passed to genetic offspring.

The view that humans acquire all or almost all their behavioral traits from "nurture" was termed by philosopher John Locke tabula rasa ("blank slate") and proposes that humans develop from only environmental influences. This question was once considered to be an appropriate division of developmental influences, but since both types of factors are known to play such interacting roles in development, most modern psychologists and anthropologists consider the question naive—representing an outdated state of knowledge.

In the social and political sciences, the nature versus nurture debate may be contrasted with the structure versus agency debate (i.e. socialization versus individual autonomy). [1]