Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| [[Image:lighterstill.jpg]][[Image:Valence.jpg|right|frame]] | | [[Image:lighterstill.jpg]][[Image:Valence.jpg|right|frame]] |
| | | |
− | The '''Valence effect''' in [[prediction]] is the tendency for people to overestimate the likelihood of good [[things]] happening rather than bad things. Valence refers to the positive or negative [[emotion]]al charge related to a given [[contingency]]. In one [[experiment]], participants assigned a higher [[probability]] to picking a card that had a smiling face on its reverse side than one which had a frowning face.[1] Additionally, some have reported a valence effect when predictions demonstrate the likelihood of positive events happening to ourselves [[relative]] to others and is an example of self-serving bias. | + | The '''Valence effect''' in [[prediction]] is the tendency for people to overestimate the likelihood of good [[things]] happening rather than bad things. Valence refers to the positive or negative [[emotion]]al charge related to a given [[contingency]]. In one [[experiment]], participants assigned a higher [[statistics|probability]] to picking a card that had a smiling face on its reverse side than one which had a frowning face.[1] Additionally, some have reported a valence effect when predictions demonstrate the likelihood of positive events happening to ourselves [[relative]] to others and is an example of self-serving bias. |
| | | |
| The result of valence effects may be called [[wishful thinking]]. However, in some cases, positive outcome bias may actually alter events in some way so that it indeed results in a positive outcome. Examples of this have been known to occur in [[war]], when commanding officers have inspired their soldiers such that they are able to emerge victorious. | | The result of valence effects may be called [[wishful thinking]]. However, in some cases, positive outcome bias may actually alter events in some way so that it indeed results in a positive outcome. Examples of this have been known to occur in [[war]], when commanding officers have inspired their soldiers such that they are able to emerge victorious. |
| ==Citation== | | ==Citation== |
− | # Nigel Taylor (2000-01-18). "Making Actuaries Less Human: Lessons from | + | # Nigel Taylor (2000-01-18). "[https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=2&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sias.org.uk%2Fdata%2Fpapers%2FBehaviouralFinance%2FDownloadPDF&ei=Srw4RpzQLpPEiwGhu7TkDA&usg=AFrqEze1605hIFtf9inCo5FHPZZTeq-DTQ&sig2=lg65w26FFzNGNf232y9ToA Making Actuaries Less Human: Lessons from Behavioral Finance" (PDF). The Staple Inn Actuarial Society]. |
| + | |
| ==References== | | ==References== |
| | | |
− | * [[David Rosenhan & Messick, S. (1966). Affect and expectation. ''Journal of Personality and Social Psychology'' '''3''', 38-44. | + | * David Rosenhan & Messick, S. (1966). Affect and expectation. ''Journal of Personality and Social Psychology'' '''3''', 38-44. |
− | * Nigel Taylor (2000). [http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=2&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sias.org.uk%2Fdata%2Fpapers%2FBehaviouralFinance%2FDownloadPDF&ei=Srw4RpzQLpPEiwGhu7TkDA&usg=AFrqEze1605hIFtf9inCo5FHPZZTeq-DTQ&sig2=lg65w26FFzNGNf232y9ToA Making Actuaries Less Human]. Staple Inn Actuarial Society, 15. ''For picking a card see section 6.2 on page 15.'' | + | * Nigel Taylor (2000). [https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&ct=res&cd=2&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.sias.org.uk%2Fdata%2Fpapers%2FBehaviouralFinance%2FDownloadPDF&ei=Srw4RpzQLpPEiwGhu7TkDA&usg=AFrqEze1605hIFtf9inCo5FHPZZTeq-DTQ&sig2=lg65w26FFzNGNf232y9ToA Making Actuaries Less Human]. Staple Inn Actuarial Society, 15. ''For picking a card see section 6.2 on page 15.'' |
| | | |
| [[Category: Psychology]] | | [[Category: Psychology]] |