Line 3: |
Line 3: |
| '''Pseudepigrapha''' are falsely attributed works, [[texts]] whose claimed [[authorship]] is unfounded; a work, simply, "whose real author attributed it to a figure of the past."[1] The word "pseudepigrapha" (from the Greek: ψευδής, pseudēs, "false" and ἐπιγραφή, epigraphē, "inscription"; see the related epigraphy) is the plural of "pseudepigraphon" (sometimes Latinized as "pseudepigraphum"); the Anglicized forms "pseudepigraph" and "pseudepigraphs" are also used. | | '''Pseudepigrapha''' are falsely attributed works, [[texts]] whose claimed [[authorship]] is unfounded; a work, simply, "whose real author attributed it to a figure of the past."[1] The word "pseudepigrapha" (from the Greek: ψευδής, pseudēs, "false" and ἐπιγραφή, epigraphē, "inscription"; see the related epigraphy) is the plural of "pseudepigraphon" (sometimes Latinized as "pseudepigraphum"); the Anglicized forms "pseudepigraph" and "pseudepigraphs" are also used. |
| | | |
− | The [[Book of Enoch]] is an example of a pseudepigraph; no [[Hebrew]] [[scholars]] would ascribe its authorship to Enoch, a figure mentioned in [http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Book_of_Genesis#Chapter_.5 Genesis 5]. Nevertheless, in some cases, especially for [[books]] belonging to a religious [[canon]], the question of whether a text is pseudepigraphical or not elicits sensations of [[loyalty]] and can become a matter of heavy [[Debate|dispute]]. The authenticity or [[value]] of the work itself, which is a separate question for [[experience]]d [[readers]], often becomes sentimentally [[Entanglement|entangled]] in the [[association]]. Though the inherent [[value]] of the [[text]] may not be called into question, the weight of a revered or even [[apostolic]] [[author]] lends [[authority]] to a [[text]]: in Antiquity pseudepigraphy was "an accepted and honored custom practiced by students/admirers of a revered figure".[2] This is the [[essential]] [[motivation]] for pseudepigraphy in the first place. | + | The [[Book of Enoch]] is an example of a pseudepigraph; no [[Hebrew]] [[scholars]] would ascribe its authorship to Enoch, a figure mentioned in [https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Book_of_Genesis#Chapter_.5 Genesis 5]. Nevertheless, in some cases, especially for [[books]] belonging to a religious [[canon]], the question of whether a text is pseudepigraphical or not elicits sensations of [[loyalty]] and can become a matter of heavy [[Debate|dispute]]. The authenticity or [[value]] of the work itself, which is a separate question for [[experience]]d [[readers]], often becomes sentimentally [[Entanglement|entangled]] in the [[association]]. Though the inherent [[value]] of the [[text]] may not be called into question, the weight of a revered or even [[apostolic]] [[author]] lends [[authority]] to a [[text]]: in Antiquity pseudepigraphy was "an accepted and honored custom practiced by students/admirers of a revered figure".[2] This is the [[essential]] [[motivation]] for pseudepigraphy in the first place. |
| | | |
− | Pseudepigraphy covers the false ascription of names of authors to works, even to perfectly authentic works that make no such claim within their text. Thus a widely accepted but incorrect attribution of authorship may make a perfectly authentic text pseudepigraphical. Assessing the actual writer of a text brings questions of pseudepigraphical attributions within the [[discipline]] of [[literary criticism]]. In a [[parallel]] case, forgers have been known to improve the [[Commerce|market]] value of a perfectly genuine [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/17th_Century 17th-century] Dutch painting by adding a painted signature [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rembrandt Rembrandt] fecit. | + | Pseudepigraphy covers the false ascription of names of authors to works, even to perfectly authentic works that make no such claim within their text. Thus a widely accepted but incorrect attribution of authorship may make a perfectly authentic text pseudepigraphical. Assessing the actual writer of a text brings questions of pseudepigraphical attributions within the [[discipline]] of [[literary criticism]]. In a [[parallel]] case, forgers have been known to improve the [[Commerce|market]] value of a perfectly genuine [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/17th_Century 17th-century] Dutch painting by adding a painted signature [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rembrandt Rembrandt] fecit. |
| | | |
| On a related note, a famous name assumed by the author of a work is an allonym. | | On a related note, a famous name assumed by the author of a work is an allonym. |
Line 19: |
Line 19: |
| See also: [[Apocrypha]] | | See also: [[Apocrypha]] |
| | | |
− | In Biblical studies, pseudepigrapha refers particularly to works which purport to be written by noted authorities in either the [[Hebrew Bible|Old]] and [[Christian Bible|New Testaments]] or by persons involved in Jewish or Christian religious [[study]] or [[history]]. These works can also be written about Biblical matters, often in such a way that they appear to be as authoritative as works which have been included in the many versions of the Judeo-Christian [[scriptures]]. Eusebius of Caesarea indicates this usage dates back at least to Serapion, bishop of Antioch) whom Eusebius records[4] as having said: "But those writings which are falsely inscribed with their name (ta pseudepigrapha), we as experienced persons reject...." | + | In Biblical studies, pseudepigrapha refers particularly to works which purport to be written by noted authorities in either the [[Hebrew Bible|Old]] and [[New Testament]]s or by persons involved in Jewish or Christian religious [[study]] or [[history]]. These works can also be written about Biblical matters, often in such a way that they appear to be as authoritative as works which have been included in the many versions of the Judeo-Christian [[scriptures]]. Eusebius of Caesarea indicates this usage dates back at least to Serapion, bishop of Antioch) whom Eusebius records[4] as having said: "But those writings which are falsely inscribed with their name (ta pseudepigrapha), we as experienced persons reject...." |
| | | |
| Many such works were also referred to as [[Apocrypha]], which originally connoted "secret writings", those that were rejected for [[liturgical]] [[public]] reading. An example of a text that is both apocryphal and pseudepigraphical is the [[Odes of Solomon]], pseudepigraphical because it was not actually written by Solomon but instead is a collection of early Christian (first to second century) hymns and poems, originally written not in Hebrew, and apocryphal because not accepted in either the Tanach or the New Testament. | | Many such works were also referred to as [[Apocrypha]], which originally connoted "secret writings", those that were rejected for [[liturgical]] [[public]] reading. An example of a text that is both apocryphal and pseudepigraphical is the [[Odes of Solomon]], pseudepigraphical because it was not actually written by Solomon but instead is a collection of early Christian (first to second century) hymns and poems, originally written not in Hebrew, and apocryphal because not accepted in either the Tanach or the New Testament. |
Line 28: |
Line 28: |
| | | |
| Examples of Old Testament pseudepigrapha are the [[Ethiopian Book of Enoch]], [[Jubilees]] (both of which are canonical in the Abyssinian Church of Ethiopia); the [[Life of Adam and Eve]] and the Pseudo-Philo. Examples of New Testament pseudepigrapha (but in these cases also likely to be called New Testament Apocrypha) are the [[Gospel of Peter]] and the attribution of the Epistle to the Laodiceans to Paul. Further examples of New Testament pseudepigrapha include the aforementioned Gospel of Barnabas, and the [[Gospel of Judas]], which begins by presenting itself as "the secret account of the [[revelation]] that [[Jesus]] spoke in conversation with Judas Iscariot". | | Examples of Old Testament pseudepigrapha are the [[Ethiopian Book of Enoch]], [[Jubilees]] (both of which are canonical in the Abyssinian Church of Ethiopia); the [[Life of Adam and Eve]] and the Pseudo-Philo. Examples of New Testament pseudepigrapha (but in these cases also likely to be called New Testament Apocrypha) are the [[Gospel of Peter]] and the attribution of the Epistle to the Laodiceans to Paul. Further examples of New Testament pseudepigrapha include the aforementioned Gospel of Barnabas, and the [[Gospel of Judas]], which begins by presenting itself as "the secret account of the [[revelation]] that [[Jesus]] spoke in conversation with Judas Iscariot". |
| + | |
| ==Biblical Pseudepigrapha== | | ==Biblical Pseudepigrapha== |
| | | |
| The term Pseudepigrapha commonly refers to numerous works of Jewish religious literature written from about 200 BC to 200 AD.[3] Not all of these works are actually pseudepigraphical.[3] Such works include the following:[3] | | The term Pseudepigrapha commonly refers to numerous works of Jewish religious literature written from about 200 BC to 200 AD.[3] Not all of these works are actually pseudepigraphical.[3] Such works include the following:[3] |
| | | |
− | * [http://www.pseudepigrapha.com/apocrypha_ot/3macc.htm 3 Maccabees] | + | * [https://www.pseudepigrapha.com/apocrypha_ot/3macc.htm 3 Maccabees] |
− | * [http://www.pseudepigrapha.com/apocrypha_ot/4macc.htm 4 Maccabees] | + | * [https://www.pseudepigrapha.com/apocrypha_ot/4macc.htm 4 Maccabees] |
− | * [http://www.pseudepigrapha.com/pseudepigrapha/assumptionofmoses.html Assumption of Moses] | + | * [https://www.pseudepigrapha.com/pseudepigrapha/assumptionofmoses.html Assumption of Moses] |
− | * [http://www.pseudepigrapha.com/pseudepigrapha/enoch.htm Ethiopic Book of Enoch] (1 Enoch) | + | * [https://www.pseudepigrapha.com/pseudepigrapha/enoch.htm Ethiopic Book of Enoch] (1 Enoch) |
− | * [http://www.pseudepigrapha.com/pseudepigrapha/enochs2.htm Slavonic Book of Enoch] (2 Enoch) | + | * [https://www.pseudepigrapha.com/pseudepigrapha/enochs2.htm Slavonic Book of Enoch] (2 Enoch) |
− | * [http://www.pseudepigrapha.com/jubilees/index.htm Book of Jubilees] | + | * [https://www.pseudepigrapha.com/jubilees/index.htm Book of Jubilees] |
− | * [http://www.pseudepigrapha.com/pseudepigrapha/3Baruch.html Greek Apocalypse of Baruch] (3 Baruch) | + | * [https://www.pseudepigrapha.com/pseudepigrapha/3Baruch.html Greek Apocalypse of Baruch] (3 Baruch) |
− | * [http://www.pseudepigrapha.com/pseudepigrapha/aristeas.htm Letter of Aristeas] | + | * [https://www.pseudepigrapha.com/pseudepigrapha/aristeas.htm Letter of Aristeas] |
− | * [http://www.pseudepigrapha.com/pseudepigrapha/slanev.htm Life of Adam and Eve] | + | * [https://www.pseudepigrapha.com/pseudepigrapha/slanev.htm Life of Adam and Eve] |
− | * [http://www.pseudepigrapha.com/pseudepigrapha/amartis.htm Martyrdom] and [http://www.pseudepigrapha.com/pseudepigrapha/AscensionOfIsaiah.html Ascension of Isaiah] | + | * [https://www.pseudepigrapha.com/pseudepigrapha/amartis.htm Martyrdom] and [https://www.pseudepigrapha.com/pseudepigrapha/AscensionOfIsaiah.html Ascension of Isaiah] |
− | * [http://www.pseudepigrapha.com/apocrypha_ot/wisolom.htm Psalms of Solomon] | + | * [https://www.pseudepigrapha.com/apocrypha_ot/wisolom.htm Psalms of Solomon] |
− | * [http://www.earlyjewishwritings.com/sibylline.html Sibylline Oracles] | + | * [https://www.earlyjewishwritings.com/sibylline.html Sibylline Oracles] |
− | * [http://www.pseudepigrapha.com/pseudepigrapha/2Baruch.html Syriac Apocalypse of Baruch] (2 Baruch) | + | * [https://www.pseudepigrapha.com/pseudepigrapha/2Baruch.html Syriac Apocalypse of Baruch] (2 Baruch) |
− | * [http://www.pseudepigrapha.com/pseudepigrapha/TalesOfThePatriarchs.html Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs] | + | * [https://www.pseudepigrapha.com/pseudepigrapha/TalesOfThePatriarchs.html Testaments of the Twelve Patriarchs] |
| | | |
| ==Notes== | | ==Notes== |