Difference between revisions of "Relevance"
(Created page with 'File:lighterstill.jpgright|frame *[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/18th_century 1733] ==Definitions== *1a : relation to the matter at hand ...') |
m (Text replacement - "http://" to "https://") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:lighterstill.jpg]][[File:Communication_DailyPic.jpg|right|frame]] | [[File:lighterstill.jpg]][[File:Communication_DailyPic.jpg|right|frame]] | ||
| − | *[ | + | *[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/18th_century 1733] |
==Definitions== | ==Definitions== | ||
*1a : relation to the matter at hand | *1a : relation to the matter at hand | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*2: the [[ability]] (as of an [[information]] retrieval system) to retrieve material that [[satisfies]] the needs of the user | *2: the [[ability]] (as of an [[information]] retrieval system) to retrieve material that [[satisfies]] the needs of the user | ||
==Description== | ==Description== | ||
| − | The [[concept]] of '''relevance''' is studied in many different fields, including [ | + | The [[concept]] of '''relevance''' is studied in many different fields, including [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_science cognitive sciences], [[logic]] and library and [[information science]]. Most fundamentally, however, it is studied in [[epistemology]] (the theory of [[knowledge]]). Different theories of knowledge have different implications for what is considered relevant and these fundamental views have implications for all other fields as well. |
| − | During the [ | + | During the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1960's 1960s], relevance became a [[fashionable]] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buzzword buzzword], meaning roughly 'relevance to [[social]] concerns', such as racial equality, [[poverty]], social [[justice]], world [[hunger]], world economic development, and so on. The implication was that some subjects, e.g., the [[study]] of [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_poetry medieval poetry] and the [[practice]] of corporate law, were not worthwhile because they did not address pressing social issues. |
| − | The [[meaning]] of "relevance" in U.S. law is reflected in Rule 401 of the [ | + | The [[meaning]] of "relevance" in U.S. law is reflected in Rule 401 of the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Rules_of_Evidence Federal Rules of Evidence]. That rule defines relevance as "having any tendency to make the [[existence]] of any [[fact]] that is of consequence to the determination of the [[action]] more probable or less probable than it would be without the [[evidence]]." In other words, if a [[fact]] were to have no bearing on the [[truth]] or [[falsity]] of a [[conclusion]], it would be legally irrelevant.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relevance] |
[[Category: Law]] | [[Category: Law]] | ||
[[Category: Philosophy]] | [[Category: Philosophy]] | ||
Latest revision as of 02:37, 13 December 2020
Definitions
- 1a : relation to the matter at hand
- b : practical and especially social applicability : pertinence <giving relevance to college courses>
- 2: the ability (as of an information retrieval system) to retrieve material that satisfies the needs of the user
Description
The concept of relevance is studied in many different fields, including cognitive sciences, logic and library and information science. Most fundamentally, however, it is studied in epistemology (the theory of knowledge). Different theories of knowledge have different implications for what is considered relevant and these fundamental views have implications for all other fields as well.
During the 1960s, relevance became a fashionable buzzword, meaning roughly 'relevance to social concerns', such as racial equality, poverty, social justice, world hunger, world economic development, and so on. The implication was that some subjects, e.g., the study of medieval poetry and the practice of corporate law, were not worthwhile because they did not address pressing social issues.
The meaning of "relevance" in U.S. law is reflected in Rule 401 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. That rule defines relevance as "having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence." In other words, if a fact were to have no bearing on the truth or falsity of a conclusion, it would be legally irrelevant.[1]
