Difference between revisions of "Rights"

From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Text replacement - "http://nordan.daynal.org" to "https://nordan.daynal.org")
m (Text replacement - "http://" to "https://")
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[File:lighterstill.jpg]][[File:Rights.jpg|right|frame]]
 
[[File:lighterstill.jpg]][[File:Rights.jpg|right|frame]]
  
*Date: [http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/18th_Century 1766]
+
*Date: [https://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/18th_Century 1766]
 
==Definition==
 
==Definition==
 
*rights (as freedom from unlawful imprisonment, torture, and execution) regarded as belonging fundamentally to all persons
 
*rights (as freedom from unlawful imprisonment, torture, and execution) regarded as belonging fundamentally to all persons
 
==Description==
 
==Description==
'''Rights''' are variously construed as [[legal]], social, or [[moral]] [[freedoms]] to [[act]] or refrain from acting, or entitlements to be acted upon or not acted upon. While the [[concept]] is [[fundamental]] to [[civilized]] [[societies]], there is considerable disagreement about what is meant precisely by the term rights. It has been used by [[different]] [[groups]] and [[thinkers]] for [[different]] [[purposes]], with different and sometimes [[opposing]] definitions, and the precise definition of the [[concept]], beyond having something to do with [[normative]]  rules of some sort or another, is controversial. Nevertheless, the [[concept]] of rights is of vital importance in such [[disciplines]] as [[law]] and [[ethics]], especially [[theories]] of [[justice]] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deontology deontology].
+
'''Rights''' are variously construed as [[legal]], social, or [[moral]] [[freedoms]] to [[act]] or refrain from acting, or entitlements to be acted upon or not acted upon. While the [[concept]] is [[fundamental]] to [[civilized]] [[societies]], there is considerable disagreement about what is meant precisely by the term rights. It has been used by [[different]] [[groups]] and [[thinkers]] for [[different]] [[purposes]], with different and sometimes [[opposing]] definitions, and the precise definition of the [[concept]], beyond having something to do with [[normative]]  rules of some sort or another, is controversial. Nevertheless, the [[concept]] of rights is of vital importance in such [[disciplines]] as [[law]] and [[ethics]], especially [[theories]] of [[justice]] and [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deontology deontology].
 
<center>For lessons on the [[topic]] of '''''Rights''''', follow [https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Category:Rights '''''this link'''''].</center>
 
<center>For lessons on the [[topic]] of '''''Rights''''', follow [https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Category:Rights '''''this link'''''].</center>
 
One way to look at [[different]] senses of the term of rights is to [[examine]] [[contrasting]] [[ideas]] about the [[concept]].
 
One way to look at [[different]] senses of the term of rights is to [[examine]] [[contrasting]] [[ideas]] about the [[concept]].
  
 
* ''Natural rights'' are rights which are derived from [[Nature]] or [[God]]. They are [[universal]]; they don't depend on the [[laws]] of a specific [[society]]. They exist [[necessarily]] and can't be taken away. For example, it has been [[argued]] that humans have a natural right to life. They're sometimes called [[moral]] rights or ''inalienable rights''.
 
* ''Natural rights'' are rights which are derived from [[Nature]] or [[God]]. They are [[universal]]; they don't depend on the [[laws]] of a specific [[society]]. They exist [[necessarily]] and can't be taken away. For example, it has been [[argued]] that humans have a natural right to life. They're sometimes called [[moral]] rights or ''inalienable rights''.
* [[Legal]] rights, in [[contrast]], are based on a [[society]]'s [[customs]], [[laws]], statutes or [[actions]] by legislatures. An example of a legal right is the right to vote of [[citizens]]. Citizenship, itself, is often considered as the basis for having [[legal]] rights, and has been defined as the "right to have rights". Legal rights are sometimes called [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_rights civil rights] or statutory rights and are [[culturally]] and [[politically]] [[relative]] since they depend on a specific societal [[context]] to have [[meaning]].
+
* [[Legal]] rights, in [[contrast]], are based on a [[society]]'s [[customs]], [[laws]], statutes or [[actions]] by legislatures. An example of a legal right is the right to vote of [[citizens]]. Citizenship, itself, is often considered as the basis for having [[legal]] rights, and has been defined as the "right to have rights". Legal rights are sometimes called [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_rights civil rights] or statutory rights and are [[culturally]] and [[politically]] [[relative]] since they depend on a specific societal [[context]] to have [[meaning]].
  
Some see rights in only one sense while others accept that both senses have a [[measure]] of validity. There has been considerable philosophical debate about these senses throughout history. For example, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Bentham Jeremy Bentham] believed that legal rights were the [[essence]] of rights, and he denied the [[existence]] of natural rights; whereas [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Aquinas Thomas Aquinas] held that rights purported by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_law positive law] but not grounded in [[natural law]] were not properly rights at all, but only a facade or pretense of rights.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rights]
+
Some see rights in only one sense while others accept that both senses have a [[measure]] of validity. There has been considerable philosophical debate about these senses throughout history. For example, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeremy_Bentham Jeremy Bentham] believed that legal rights were the [[essence]] of rights, and he denied the [[existence]] of natural rights; whereas [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Aquinas Thomas Aquinas] held that rights purported by [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_law positive law] but not grounded in [[natural law]] were not properly rights at all, but only a facade or pretense of rights.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rights]
  
 
[[Category: Law]]
 
[[Category: Law]]

Latest revision as of 02:35, 13 December 2020

Lighterstill.jpg

Rights.jpg

Definition

  • rights (as freedom from unlawful imprisonment, torture, and execution) regarded as belonging fundamentally to all persons

Description

Rights are variously construed as legal, social, or moral freedoms to act or refrain from acting, or entitlements to be acted upon or not acted upon. While the concept is fundamental to civilized societies, there is considerable disagreement about what is meant precisely by the term rights. It has been used by different groups and thinkers for different purposes, with different and sometimes opposing definitions, and the precise definition of the concept, beyond having something to do with normative rules of some sort or another, is controversial. Nevertheless, the concept of rights is of vital importance in such disciplines as law and ethics, especially theories of justice and deontology.

For lessons on the topic of Rights, follow this link.

One way to look at different senses of the term of rights is to examine contrasting ideas about the concept.

  • Natural rights are rights which are derived from Nature or God. They are universal; they don't depend on the laws of a specific society. They exist necessarily and can't be taken away. For example, it has been argued that humans have a natural right to life. They're sometimes called moral rights or inalienable rights.
  • Legal rights, in contrast, are based on a society's customs, laws, statutes or actions by legislatures. An example of a legal right is the right to vote of citizens. Citizenship, itself, is often considered as the basis for having legal rights, and has been defined as the "right to have rights". Legal rights are sometimes called civil rights or statutory rights and are culturally and politically relative since they depend on a specific societal context to have meaning.

Some see rights in only one sense while others accept that both senses have a measure of validity. There has been considerable philosophical debate about these senses throughout history. For example, Jeremy Bentham believed that legal rights were the essence of rights, and he denied the existence of natural rights; whereas Thomas Aquinas held that rights purported by positive law but not grounded in natural law were not properly rights at all, but only a facade or pretense of rights.[1]