Changes

*Syntactics: Relation of signs to each other in [[formal]] [[structures]].

*Syntactics: Relation of signs to each other in [[formal]] [[structures]].

*Pragmatics: Relation of signs to their impacts on those who use them.

*Pragmatics: Relation of signs to their impacts on those who use them.

<center>For lessons on the ''somewhat'' related [[topic]] of "'''Signs'''", follow [http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Category:Signs '''''this link'''''].</center>

<center>For lessons on the ''somewhat'' related [[topic]] of "'''Signs'''", follow [http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Category:Signs '''''this link'''''].</center>

Semiotics is frequently seen as having important [[anthropological]] dimensions, for example [[Umberto Eco]] proposes that every cultural [[phenomenon]] can be studied as [[communication]]. However, some semioticians [[focus]] on the [[logic]]al [[dimensions]] of the [[science]]. They examine areas belonging also to the natural sciences - such as how [[organism]]s make predictions about, and adapt to, their semiotic niche in the world (see semiosis). In general, semiotic theories take signs or sign systems as their object of study: the communication of information in living organisms is covered in biosemiotics or zoosemiosis.

Semiotics is frequently seen as having important [[anthropological]] dimensions, for example [[Umberto Eco]] proposes that every cultural [[phenomenon]] can be studied as [[communication]]. However, some semioticians [[focus]] on the [[logic]]al [[dimensions]] of the [[science]]. They examine areas belonging also to the natural sciences - such as how [[organism]]s make predictions about, and adapt to, their semiotic niche in the world (see semiosis). In general, semiotic theories take signs or sign systems as their object of study: the communication of information in living organisms is covered in biosemiotics or zoosemiosis.