102,815
edits
Changes
no edit summary
I have represented the statements as best I can for the moment, but without further offers of any adjustment to the terminology, I will remove attribution to you and include all comments in this thread allowing readers a better picture of the "facts".--rdavis 23:39, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
I have represented the statements as best I can for the moment, but without further offers of any adjustment to the terminology, I will remove attribution to you and include all comments in this thread allowing readers a better picture of the "facts".--rdavis 23:39, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
----
Jim Cleveland wrote on Oct. 20th at 5:40pm:
Might not be a good idea to turn the Daynal Institute into a student union bulletin board.
----
Gerdean Bowen wrote on Oct. 20th at 5:46pm:
I was gonna say ... working WITH someone, (as opposed to FOR someone) ... is very zooidal and a principle I can certainly subscribe to. So, I will fix it, thank you. And I guess from now on I'd best weigh my words very carefully and look to find them misconstrued under every bush. But I shall persevere ... neither rain nor sleet nor hail not dark of night shall separate me from my task.
Where do I sign up. Am I a member? Do I have a password already? Can you walk me through if I get lost? I am not enjoying having to learn yet another program. But, of course, I am far more interested in learning how to function among you and competently, than I am of lamenting my limitations and whining over the future.
... mistakes along the way
often make wonderful memories.