Changes

no edit summary
Line 52: Line 52:  
----
 
----
 
Thanks Byron! The thoughts attributed to you in the lessons sound authentic, that is to say, I don't another would ask some of these questions re: publishing, etc. So your suspicion of the record being assigned too early a date seem true. I will insert your comments in the discussion page of the record and see if others recall more.--rdavis 19:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 
Thanks Byron! The thoughts attributed to you in the lessons sound authentic, that is to say, I don't another would ask some of these questions re: publishing, etc. So your suspicion of the record being assigned too early a date seem true. I will insert your comments in the discussion page of the record and see if others recall more.--rdavis 19:59, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 +
 +
----
 +
Gerdean,
 +
 +
Byron concurs with your assessment that the date is too early for this record though he cannot recall exactly when it was. As he advised inquiring with Jim, I will ask Jim to offer his own recollection that might be confirmed with yet another.
 +
 +
Jim, if you are reading tml at the moment, can you let us know what you think?
 +
 +
Thanks,
 +
 +
Rob
 +
 +
re: actual date of 1992-01-02-On The New Mission--rdavis 20:27, 6 October 2011 (UTC)