Difference between revisions of "Talk:2013-09-13-New Era Conversations 8"

From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
See [http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2013-08-31-New_Era_Conversations_7#USA_Moral_Upholder.3F New Era Conversations 7 talkpage] for questions referenced in this document.--rdavis 00:59, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
 
See [http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2013-08-31-New_Era_Conversations_7#USA_Moral_Upholder.3F New Era Conversations 7 talkpage] for questions referenced in this document.--rdavis 00:59, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
 +
==Which Side?==
 +
'''Rob wrote: September 18, 2013 at 3:25 pm'''
 +
 +
If New Era Conversations 7 wasn't bad enough referring to the USA as upholder of morality in the world while most persons could see it was the USA's nemesis holding out for the rule of law with regard to the targeting of Assad, we now have New Era Conversations 8 with the following:
 +
 +
<blockquote>"There will be many opportunities in the future to destabilize the Middle East and eventually the world"</blockquote>
 +
 +
<blockquote>"It would be nice to have him (Assad) eliminated from the position he has to make decisions [that] end the lives of many of his citizens."</blockquote>
 +
 +
<blockquote>"Do you not think it is odd that the nations of the Middle East say nothing about the gassing of a nation’s own citizens, which has been recorded many, many times in the reign of Assad’s father?"</blockquote>
 +
 +
This presumption upon the guilt of this head of state for the recent use of chemical weapons when the preponderance of evidence is pointing toward US complicity in supplying such weapons to its proxy warriors by way of Saudia Arabia and Turkey will be  problematic--rdavis 20:51, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:51, 18 September 2013

Lighterstill.jpg

See New Era Conversations 7 talkpage for questions referenced in this document.--rdavis 00:59, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Which Side?

Rob wrote: September 18, 2013 at 3:25 pm

If New Era Conversations 7 wasn't bad enough referring to the USA as upholder of morality in the world while most persons could see it was the USA's nemesis holding out for the rule of law with regard to the targeting of Assad, we now have New Era Conversations 8 with the following:

"There will be many opportunities in the future to destabilize the Middle East and eventually the world"

"It would be nice to have him (Assad) eliminated from the position he has to make decisions [that] end the lives of many of his citizens."

"Do you not think it is odd that the nations of the Middle East say nothing about the gassing of a nation’s own citizens, which has been recorded many, many times in the reign of Assad’s father?"

This presumption upon the guilt of this head of state for the recent use of chemical weapons when the preponderance of evidence is pointing toward US complicity in supplying such weapons to its proxy warriors by way of Saudia Arabia and Turkey will be problematic--rdavis 20:51, 18 September 2013 (UTC)