13,094
edits
Changes
Talk:2015-09-21-New TML and Invitation (view source)
Revision as of 00:09, 13 December 2020
, 00:09, 13 December 2020Text replacement - "http://" to "https://"
"a stern warning to Nebadon, that this time it better be kept in control and those who wish to independently strike out on their own will be stopped. In my days as Creator Son, I seldom have seen such behavior that was elicited by some in the old Teaching Mission which utterly confused and destroyed what cohesion we could manage and so it had to be scrapped and with the hope of being useful this time,"
"a stern warning to Nebadon, that this time it better be kept in control and those who wish to independently strike out on their own will be stopped. In my days as Creator Son, I seldom have seen such behavior that was elicited by some in the old Teaching Mission which utterly confused and destroyed what cohesion we could manage and so it had to be scrapped and with the hope of being useful this time,"
I will appreciate your thoughts on how I might handle these. At present, I am inclined to reference them with a note that the contents are being withheld until a quorum exists that might choose to include them after discussion could be incorporated into the talkpage of the record. ([http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2015-01-19-The_Flurry_18 see this for example])
I will appreciate your thoughts on how I might handle these. At present, I am inclined to reference them with a note that the contents are being withheld until a quorum exists that might choose to include them after discussion could be incorporated into the talkpage of the record. ([https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2015-01-19-The_Flurry_18 see this for example])
Gratefully,
Gratefully,
Currently, I have in place three indicators of concern over integrity of any content. I use the first when there is content is of concern but without verifiable errors of fact. The second is used when such errors are detected while the third is used when bigotry appears in the text.
Currently, I have in place three indicators of concern over integrity of any content. I use the first when there is content is of concern but without verifiable errors of fact. The second is used when such errors are detected while the third is used when bigotry appears in the text.
:1. A flag at top of any page that says “Warning: Disinformation Risk-See discussion page for comments” ([http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=File:Discussion2.jpg 1])
:1. A flag at top of any page that says “Warning: Disinformation Risk-See discussion page for comments” ([https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=File:Discussion2.jpg 1])
:2. More problematic pages include a Disinformation icon instead of the standard icon used. ([http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=File:Disinfo100.jpg 2])
:2. More problematic pages include a Disinformation icon instead of the standard icon used. ([https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=File:Disinfo100.jpg 2])
:3. Pages of most concern are an empty record with a note the material awaits approval by a quorum. ([http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2015-01-19-The_Flurry_18 3])
:3. Pages of most concern are an empty record with a note the material awaits approval by a quorum. ([https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2015-01-19-The_Flurry_18 3])
Such editorial decisions are not made without consultation and used only when egregious expressions are found in what are admittedly human expressions even while attributed to divine beings. It is after all our very human language that is used by celestials in any task of transmitting, UB, ACIM, TM, etc. Our challenge is to make the necessary space where each are free to share our respective senses of propriety eschewing then the preponderant tendency in this world to elevate purely personal evaluations to the level of absolutes.
Such editorial decisions are not made without consultation and used only when egregious expressions are found in what are admittedly human expressions even while attributed to divine beings. It is after all our very human language that is used by celestials in any task of transmitting, UB, ACIM, TM, etc. Our challenge is to make the necessary space where each are free to share our respective senses of propriety eschewing then the preponderant tendency in this world to elevate purely personal evaluations to the level of absolutes.
Yes, I do hope we can meet in person before either of us graduate to the next classroom. Regardless, it will be a joy to finally meet you in person.
Yes, I do hope we can meet in person before either of us graduate to the next classroom. Regardless, it will be a joy to finally meet you in person.
Gratefully,
Rob
==Saturday, September 26, 2015==
'''Mer wrote: On Sep 26, 2015, at 7:55 AM'''
Hello Rob!
I am so pleased that you may be able to join us!
I am dismayed, yet again, by Ron's latest missive, 'The New Teaching Mission', because I think it suggests that he has an organic brain disorder. I remember when Ron was once bright and articulate, and I find the general degeneration in his thinking and writing skills obvious. I am sincerely concerned about Alzheimer's or some other form of degenerative brain disease. Soon, I fear his communications will devolve into incoherent ramblings, and they are perilously close to that already. This forces the Daynal Scriptorium to make a judgement call about whether his transmissions are appropriate for inclusion into the collection, and, sadly, I vote 'no'.
Mer
'''Rob wrote: On Sep 26, 2015, at 4:55 PM'''
Dear Mer,
I am grateful to have the encouragement of friends attending the parliament and in editorial decision making!
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the recent offering of a “New Teaching Mission”! I appreciate your direct and decisive thoughts. It was the “Flurry 18” that demonstrated a level of disorientation that led me to withhold the lesson out of respect for the real Ron whose acuity you recall well. ([https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2015-01-19-The_Flurry_18 1])
While we haven’t heard from Byron, it does appear that the overwhelming consensus is to withhold these, “sidelining" them in the Scriptorium "at this time”. It seems these lessons serve as an object lesson in the exercise of personal and group discernment where divergent opinions can be respectfully gathered.
Gratefully,
Rob
==Sunday, September 27, 2015==
'''Byron wrote: On Sep 27, 2015, at 12:12 AM'''
Rob, I’ll keep it simple. I agree with others that you should ignore this material and not even engage with it at this time. It is in a category all of its own and Ron’s current trajectory is far outside of the lineage that you have tracked so diligently. His unique category is what I would call “unfathomability."
—Byron
'''Rob wrote: On Sep 27, 2015, at 4:32 PM'''
Thank you Byron! It seems sharing responsibility for the largest collection of Teaching Mission lessons precludes ignoring altogether lessons attributed to our universe government re: a New Teaching Mission. However, making an empty record of the lesson with comments in its talkpage as to why it is empty will assist readers unaware of the discrepancy between any personal claims to officially represent the TM/MM and the body of evidence to the contrary. Otherwise, the categories assigned to the two recent pieces are:
:The Teaching Mission: Dialogues
:At Large (York TeaM & ABC Summaries are the other ‘group’ categories for Ron’s work)
:Andromadeus, Michael, Abraham, Machiventa, Nebadonia
:Ron Besser
:2015
I do use a category called “Unknown”, but it is primarily for unidentified sources - teachers, tr’s, groups, etc. There are also a number of ‘groups’ outside the ‘TeaM' network whose lessons are featured. These are:
:11:11 Progress Group
:ABC Summaries
:Abundant Hope
:Center for Christ Consciousness
:ERETHEA
:Long View Project
:Mezza Verde Group
:Philippines Mission
:School of Light and Life
Gratefully,
Rob
'''Rob wrote: On Sep 27, 2015, at 10:21 PM'''
Dear Friends,
I see now that as of this hour tonight, the lessons we just discussed were included in the collection Vladimir Krasnopolsky circulates as a bi-weekly recap of lessons received. I have always used this as a tool for defining what I would include, and therefore, for the moment, I have inserted the text of these lessons along with the two disinformation flags indicating my editorial opinion. You can view them here and here. I will sleep on this situation and make some decisions about the future of this project. I ask for your prayers and patience.
Gratefully,
Gratefully,
Rob
Rob