Changes

"a stern warning to Nebadon, that this time it better be kept in control and those who wish to independently strike out on their own will be stopped. In my days as Creator Son, I seldom have seen such behavior that was elicited by some in the old Teaching Mission which utterly confused and destroyed what cohesion we could manage and so it had to be scrapped and with the hope of being useful this time,"

"a stern warning to Nebadon, that this time it better be kept in control and those who wish to independently strike out on their own will be stopped. In my days as Creator Son, I seldom have seen such behavior that was elicited by some in the old Teaching Mission which utterly confused and destroyed what cohesion we could manage and so it had to be scrapped and with the hope of being useful this time,"

I will appreciate your thoughts on how I might handle these. At present, I am inclined to reference them with a note that the contents are being withheld until a quorum exists that might choose to include them after discussion could be incorporated into the talkpage of the record. ([http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2015-01-19-The_Flurry_18 see this for example])

I will appreciate your thoughts on how I might handle these. At present, I am inclined to reference them with a note that the contents are being withheld until a quorum exists that might choose to include them after discussion could be incorporated into the talkpage of the record. ([https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2015-01-19-The_Flurry_18 see this for example])

Gratefully,

Gratefully,

Currently, I have in place three indicators of concern over integrity of any content. I use the first when there is content is of concern but without verifiable errors of fact. The second is used when such errors are detected while the third is used when bigotry appears in the text.  

Currently, I have in place three indicators of concern over integrity of any content. I use the first when there is content is of concern but without verifiable errors of fact. The second is used when such errors are detected while the third is used when bigotry appears in the text.  

:1. A flag at top of any page that says “Warning: Disinformation Risk-See discussion page for comments” ([http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=File:Discussion2.jpg 1])

:1. A flag at top of any page that says “Warning: Disinformation Risk-See discussion page for comments” ([https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=File:Discussion2.jpg 1])

:2. More problematic pages include a Disinformation icon instead of the standard icon used. ([http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=File:Disinfo100.jpg 2])

:2. More problematic pages include a Disinformation icon instead of the standard icon used. ([https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=File:Disinfo100.jpg 2])

:3. Pages of most concern are an empty record with a note the material awaits approval by a quorum. ([http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2015-01-19-The_Flurry_18 3])

:3. Pages of most concern are an empty record with a note the material awaits approval by a quorum. ([https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=2015-01-19-The_Flurry_18 3])

Such editorial decisions are not made without consultation and used only when egregious expressions are found in what are admittedly human expressions even while attributed to divine beings. It is after all our very human language that is used by celestials in any task of transmitting, UB, ACIM, TM, etc. Our challenge is to make the necessary space where each are free to share our respective senses of propriety eschewing then the preponderant tendency in this world to elevate purely personal evaluations to the level of absolutes.

Such editorial decisions are not made without consultation and used only when egregious expressions are found in what are admittedly human expressions even while attributed to divine beings. It is after all our very human language that is used by celestials in any task of transmitting, UB, ACIM, TM, etc. Our challenge is to make the necessary space where each are free to share our respective senses of propriety eschewing then the preponderant tendency in this world to elevate purely personal evaluations to the level of absolutes.

I am grateful to have the encouragement of friends attending the parliament and in editorial decision making!

I am grateful to have the encouragement of friends attending the parliament and in editorial decision making!

Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the recent offering of a “New Teaching Mission”! I appreciate your direct and decisive thoughts. It was the “Flurry 18” that demonstrated a level of disorientation that led me to withhold the lesson out of respect for the real Ron whose acuity you recall well. ([http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2015-01-19-The_Flurry_18 1])

Thank you for sharing your thoughts on the recent offering of a “New Teaching Mission”! I appreciate your direct and decisive thoughts. It was the “Flurry 18” that demonstrated a level of disorientation that led me to withhold the lesson out of respect for the real Ron whose acuity you recall well. ([https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:2015-01-19-The_Flurry_18 1])

While we haven’t heard from Byron, it does appear that the overwhelming consensus is to withhold these, “sidelining" them in the Scriptorium "at this time”. It seems these lessons serve as an object lesson in the exercise of personal and group discernment where divergent opinions can be respectfully gathered.

While we haven’t heard from Byron, it does appear that the overwhelming consensus is to withhold these, “sidelining" them in the Scriptorium "at this time”. It seems these lessons serve as an object lesson in the exercise of personal and group discernment where divergent opinions can be respectfully gathered.