Changes

From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to search
1,705 bytes added ,  20:10, 26 September 2013
Created page with 'File:lighterstill.jpgright|frame ==Origin== Medieval Latin ''recrimination''-, ''recriminatio'', from ''recriminare'' to make a retaliatory c...'
[[File:lighterstill.jpg]][[File:Recriminations.jpg|right|frame]]

==Origin==
Medieval Latin ''recrimination''-, ''recriminatio'', from ''recriminare'' to make a [[retaliatory]] charge, from [[Latin]] ''re''- + ''criminari'' to [[accuse]]
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/15th_century 1611]
==Definitions==
*1 : a retaliatory [[accusation]]; also : the making of such accusations <endless recrimination>
==Description==
In [[law]], '''recrimination''' is a [[defense]] in an action for [[divorce]] in which the accused party makes a similar [[accusation]] against the plaintiff. In plain English, it is a lawyer's way of saying "you too."

''Recrimination'' was generally considered by [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_law family law] experts to be one of the most [[dysfunctional]] and illogical aspects of the old fault-based divorce system in [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law common law] countries. For example, in the context of a [[marriage]] where the marital [[relationship]] has collapsed to the point that both [[spouses]] are openly committing [[adultery]], the assertion by either spouse of this defense would prevent a [[divorce]] even though the family unit is clearly no longer capable of [[functioning]].

As a result, the defense was formally abolished by statute in many [[jurisdictions]] when they converted to a [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No-fault_divorce no-fault divorce] regime.

The corollary principle of comparative rectitude ameliorated the effects of the ''recrimination'' [[doctrine]] by holding that if the [[offenses]] were of entirely different orders of seriousness, the spouse [[guilty]] of the lesser fault was still entitled to relief.

[[Category: Law]]

Navigation menu