Changes

==Origin==

==Origin==

Late Latin ''tautologia'', from [[Greek]], from ''tautologos''

Late Latin ''tautologia'', from [[Greek]], from ''tautologos''

*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16th_century 1574]

*[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16th_century 1574]

==Definition==

==Definition==

*1 : needless [[repetition]] of an [[idea]], [[statement]], or [[word]]

*1 : needless [[repetition]] of an [[idea]], [[statement]], or [[word]]

:“A beginner who has just started” is a ''tautology''.

:“A beginner who has just started” is a ''tautology''.

==Description==

==Description==

'''Tautology''' (from [[Greek]] ''tauto'', "the same" and logos, "[[word]]/idea") is an unnecessary [[repetition]] of [[meaning]], using dissimilar words that effectively say the same thing (often originally from different languages). It is considered a [[fault]] of style and was defined by ''[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Dictionary_of_Modern_English_Usage A Dictionary of Modern English Usage]'' (Fowler) as "saying the same thing twice," if it is not apparently [[necessary]] for the entire meaning of a phrase to be repeated. If a part of the [[meaning]] is repeated in such a way that it appears as unintentional, or clumsy, then it may be described as ''tautology''. On the other hand, a repetition of meaning which improves the style of a piece of [[speech]] or [[writing]] is not necessarily described as ''tautology''. In evaluating [[worldviews]], logicians do not concern themselves that the premises are correct or not, but whether the conclusions derive logically.

'''Tautology''' (from [[Greek]] ''tauto'', "the same" and logos, "[[word]]/idea") is an unnecessary [[repetition]] of [[meaning]], using dissimilar words that effectively say the same thing (often originally from different languages). It is considered a [[fault]] of style and was defined by ''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Dictionary_of_Modern_English_Usage A Dictionary of Modern English Usage]'' (Fowler) as "saying the same thing twice," if it is not apparently [[necessary]] for the entire meaning of a phrase to be repeated. If a part of the [[meaning]] is repeated in such a way that it appears as unintentional, or clumsy, then it may be described as ''tautology''. On the other hand, a repetition of meaning which improves the style of a piece of [[speech]] or [[writing]] is not necessarily described as ''tautology''. In evaluating [[worldviews]], logicians do not concern themselves that the premises are correct or not, but whether the conclusions derive logically.

A rhetorical tautology is defined as a [[series]] of [[statements]] that form an [[argument]], whereby the statements are constructed in such a way that the [[truth]] of the [[proposition]] is guaranteed or that, by defining a dissimilar or synonymous term in terms of another self-referentially, the [[truth]] of the proposition or [[explanation]] cannot be disputed. Consequently, the statement conveys no useful [[information]] regardless of its length or [[complexity]] making it unfalsifiable. It is a way of formulating a [[description]] such that it masquerades as an explanation when the real reason for the [[phenomena]] cannot be independently derived. A rhetorical tautology should not be [[confused]] with a tautology in propositional logic, which by the precepts of empiricism is not falsifiable.[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tautology_%28rhetoric%29]

A rhetorical tautology is defined as a [[series]] of [[statements]] that form an [[argument]], whereby the statements are constructed in such a way that the [[truth]] of the [[proposition]] is guaranteed or that, by defining a dissimilar or synonymous term in terms of another self-referentially, the [[truth]] of the proposition or [[explanation]] cannot be disputed. Consequently, the statement conveys no useful [[information]] regardless of its length or [[complexity]] making it unfalsifiable. It is a way of formulating a [[description]] such that it masquerades as an explanation when the real reason for the [[phenomena]] cannot be independently derived. A rhetorical tautology should not be [[confused]] with a tautology in propositional logic, which by the precepts of empiricism is not falsifiable.[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tautology_%28rhetoric%29]

[[Category: Logic]]

[[Category: Logic]]