Changes

no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1: −
Ham061592Judgment
+
[[Image:lighterstill.jpg]]
 
  −
Group: Woods Cross, Utah
  −
 
  −
Teachers:  HAM  and Aaron
  −
 
  −
Topic:  JUDGMENT
  −
 
  −
JUNE 15, 1992
      +
==Heading==
 +
===Topic: ''Judgement''===
 +
===Group: [[Woods Cross TeaM]]===
 +
==Facilitators==
 +
===Teacher: [[Ham]], [[Aaron]]===
 +
===TR: [[Nina]]===
 +
==Session==
 +
===Opening===
 
Greetings. I am Aaron. I am connected with the training mission of Melchizedek on this world. Our lesson this evening is concerning - judgement.   
 
Greetings. I am Aaron. I am connected with the training mission of Melchizedek on this world. Our lesson this evening is concerning - judgement.   
 
+
===Lesson===
 
How easily it becomes us to judge another human fellow. It is often tardy or is instant. Often it is either growing or diminishing. Often judgement is ‘deep within' attitudinal or it is ‘superficially' attitudinal. Often are we tempted to judge at first sight. Often we are tempted to judge in relationships, judge actions without knowing full intentions, or even worse - without full intention.   
 
How easily it becomes us to judge another human fellow. It is often tardy or is instant. Often it is either growing or diminishing. Often judgement is ‘deep within' attitudinal or it is ‘superficially' attitudinal. Often are we tempted to judge at first sight. Often we are tempted to judge in relationships, judge actions without knowing full intentions, or even worse - without full intention.   
   Line 30: Line 30:     
Your own justice system is very flawed and is in need of revision with this higher understanding incorporated within it. The old law ‘an eye for a eye, tooth for a tooth' is not practical, nor is it serviceable to mankind. However one may feel that it is fair - it is not. Fairness must take into consideration motives and intentions, etc. Justice cannot be blind to intentions, for then it becomes unfair.
 
Your own justice system is very flawed and is in need of revision with this higher understanding incorporated within it. The old law ‘an eye for a eye, tooth for a tooth' is not practical, nor is it serviceable to mankind. However one may feel that it is fair - it is not. Fairness must take into consideration motives and intentions, etc. Justice cannot be blind to intentions, for then it becomes unfair.
 
+
===Dialogue===
 
QUESTION: What is the distinction between assessing a persons character and judging a persons character?
 
QUESTION: What is the distinction between assessing a persons character and judging a persons character?
   Line 59: Line 59:  
HAM: It is not possible to completely be accurate. Your understanding toward another is always limited no matter how close you are to this person. Complete understanding is limited. It is not possible. Our complete understanding of ourselves is also limited. Impossible, is complete understanding on this level of existence, and furthermore, for many, many levels - existences ahead. Paradise is the only place where one can claim complete personal awareness and understanding. So you see, there are the possibilities for misunderstanding all the way to paradise. How can you hope to have complete understanding on this level?
 
HAM: It is not possible to completely be accurate. Your understanding toward another is always limited no matter how close you are to this person. Complete understanding is limited. It is not possible. Our complete understanding of ourselves is also limited. Impossible, is complete understanding on this level of existence, and furthermore, for many, many levels - existences ahead. Paradise is the only place where one can claim complete personal awareness and understanding. So you see, there are the possibilities for misunderstanding all the way to paradise. How can you hope to have complete understanding on this level?
   −
END
+
[[Category: The Teaching Mission: Dialogues]]
 +
[[Category: Woods Cross TeaM]]
 +
[[Category: Ham]]
 +
[[Category: Aaron]]
 +
[[Category: Nina]]
 +
[[Category: 1992]]