Changes

From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to search
66 bytes added ,  13:24, 8 September 2009
no edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:     
The idea of progress is often associated with the Western notion of a straight linear direction as developed by [[Aristotle]], or the more complex notion as developed by [[Plato]]. Both versions are found in Judeo-Christian [[doctrine]]. The idea spread during the [[Renaissance]] in early modern Europe, marking the end of the [[static]] view of [[history]] and society which characterized feudalism. Belief in progress was a dominant paradigm in the 18th and 19th centuries, and the Industrial Revolution.
 
The idea of progress is often associated with the Western notion of a straight linear direction as developed by [[Aristotle]], or the more complex notion as developed by [[Plato]]. Both versions are found in Judeo-Christian [[doctrine]]. The idea spread during the [[Renaissance]] in early modern Europe, marking the end of the [[static]] view of [[history]] and society which characterized feudalism. Belief in progress was a dominant paradigm in the 18th and 19th centuries, and the Industrial Revolution.
<center>For lessons on the [[topic]] of '''''Progress''''', follow this link.</center>
+
<center>For lessons on the [[topic]] of '''''Progress''''', follow [http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Category:Progress this link].</center>
 
==Antiquity==
 
==Antiquity==
 
Historian J. B. Bury argued that thought in ancient Greece was dominated by the theory of world-cycles or the doctrine of eternal return, and was steeped in a [[belief]] parallel to the Judaic "fall of man," but rather from a preceding "Golden Age" of innocence and simplicity. [[Time]] was generally regarded as the enemy of [[humanity]] which depreciates the [[value]] of the world. He credits the [[Epicureans]] with having had a potential for leading to the [[foundation]] of a theory of Progress through their [[materialistic]] acceptance of the atomism of Democritus as the explanation for a world without an intervening [[Deity]]. "For them, the earliest condition of men resembled that of the beasts, and from this primitive and miserable condition they laboriously reached the existing fragile [[state]] of [[civilization]], not by external guidance or as a consequence of some initial [[design]], but simply by the exercise of human [[intelligence]] throughout a long period."
 
Historian J. B. Bury argued that thought in ancient Greece was dominated by the theory of world-cycles or the doctrine of eternal return, and was steeped in a [[belief]] parallel to the Judaic "fall of man," but rather from a preceding "Golden Age" of innocence and simplicity. [[Time]] was generally regarded as the enemy of [[humanity]] which depreciates the [[value]] of the world. He credits the [[Epicureans]] with having had a potential for leading to the [[foundation]] of a theory of Progress through their [[materialistic]] acceptance of the atomism of Democritus as the explanation for a world without an intervening [[Deity]]. "For them, the earliest condition of men resembled that of the beasts, and from this primitive and miserable condition they laboriously reached the existing fragile [[state]] of [[civilization]], not by external guidance or as a consequence of some initial [[design]], but simply by the exercise of human [[intelligence]] throughout a long period."

Navigation menu