Ancient [[Greek]] philosophers, describing and commenting on the uncontrolled anger, particularly toward [[slaves]], in their [[society]] generally showed a hostile attitude towards anger. Galen and Seneca regarded anger as a kind of madness. They all rejected the [[spontaneous]], uncontrolled fits of anger and agreed on both the possibility and [[value]] of controlling anger. There were however disagreements regarding the [[value]] of anger. For Seneca, anger was "worthless even for war." Seneca believed that the [[discipline]]d Roman army was regularly able to beat the Germans, who were known for their fury. He argued that "...in sporting contests, it is a mistake to become angry".[9] | Ancient [[Greek]] philosophers, describing and commenting on the uncontrolled anger, particularly toward [[slaves]], in their [[society]] generally showed a hostile attitude towards anger. Galen and Seneca regarded anger as a kind of madness. They all rejected the [[spontaneous]], uncontrolled fits of anger and agreed on both the possibility and [[value]] of controlling anger. There were however disagreements regarding the [[value]] of anger. For Seneca, anger was "worthless even for war." Seneca believed that the [[discipline]]d Roman army was regularly able to beat the Germans, who were known for their fury. He argued that "...in sporting contests, it is a mistake to become angry".[9] |