103,025
edits
Changes
From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to searchNew page: '''Ethics''' (via Latin ''{{lang|la|ethica}}'' from the Ancient Greek {{lang|grc|ἠθική [φιλοσοφία]}} "moral philosophy", from the adjective of {{lang|grc|[[ἤθ...
'''Ethics''' (via [[Latin]] ''{{lang|la|ethica}}'' from the [[Ancient Greek]] {{lang|grc|ἠθική [φιλοσοφία]}} "moral philosophy", from the [[adjective]] of {{lang|grc|[[ἤθος]]}} ''ēthos'' "custom, habit"), a major branch of philosophy, is the study of [[Value theory|value]]s and [[Custom (law)|custom]]s of a person or group. It covers the [[Philosophical analysis|analysis]] and employment of [[concept]]s such as [[right]] and [[wrong]], [[good and evil]], and [[moral responsibility|responsibility]]. It is divided into three primary areas: ''meta-ethics'' (the study of the concept of ethics), ''normative ethics'' (the study of how to determine ethical values), and ''applied ethics'' (the study of the use of ethical values).
==Meta-ethics==
There are two main strands of thought, '[[moral relativism|non-realism]]' and '[[moral objectivism|realism]],' that attempt to explain what ethical values and claims are actually about.
'Non-realism' suggests moral values are creations, dependent on people's feelings and goals regarding themselves and others ([[emotivism]] or [[prescriptivism]]) or on their belief systems ([[cultural relativism|cultural]] or individual relativism). Despite the name 'non-realist', such theories may see reality as important in shaping the human choice of ethical values. This could occur indirectly by, for example, the evolutionary or developmental shaping of human psychology, or directly through, for example, people assessing and debating the likely consequences of their actions.
Another strand of meta-ethical theory, called 'realism', holds that moral value is somehow an intrinsic property of the world and that ethical principles are simply discovered or intuited. Under this view, ethical values held by people can at best reflect an independent [[truth]] by which their validity must be judged. These theories may be derived from [[theology]] or [[Naturalism (philosophy)|naturalism]].
==Normative ethics==
Normative ethics is the study of ethical [[norm (philosophy)|norms]] - moral standards that tell us how to judge right from wrong, or good from bad, and how to live moral lives. This may involve articulating the character or good habits that we should acquire, the duties that we should follow, or the consequences of our actions on ourselves and others. These have traditionally been the three main approaches to normative ethics.
Normative ethicists who follow the first approach are often called [[virtue ethics|virtue ethicists]], and articulate the various virtues or good habits that should be acquired. [[Aristotle]] is a pioneer virtue ethicist.
Normative ethicists who follow the second approach are often called [[deontological ethics|deontological ethicists]]. [[Immanuel Kant]] set out a large framework for a deontological normative ethical theory.
Normative ethicists who follow the third approach are often called [[consequentialism|consequentialists]] or (specifically in regard to the theory of the greatest good for the greatest number) [[utilitarianism|utilitarian]]s; [[John Stuart Mill]] set out a large framework for a utilitarian normative ethics.
==Descriptive ethics==
Descriptive ethics is a [[value-free]] approach to ethics which examines ethics not from a top-down ''[[a priori]]'' perspective but rather [[revealed preference|observations of actual choices]] made by moral agents in practice. Some philosophers rely on descriptive ethics and choices made and unchallenged by a [[society]] or [[culture]] to derive categories, which typically vary by context. This can lead to [[situational ethics]] and [[situated ethics]]. These philosophers often view [[aesthetics]], [[etiquette]], and [[arbitration]] as more fundamental, percolating "bottom up" to imply the existence of, rather than explicitly prescribe, theories of value or of conduct. The study of descriptive ethics may include examinations of the following:
* [[Ethical code]]s applied by various groups. Some consider aesthetics itself the basis of ethics – and a personal [[moral core]] developed through art and storytelling as very influential in one's later ethical choices.
* Informal theories of [[etiquette]] which tend to be less rigorous and more situational. Some consider etiquette a simple negative ethics, i.e. where can one evade an uncomfortable truth without doing wrong? One notable advocate of this view is [[Judith Martin]] ("Miss Manners"). According to this view, ethics is more a summary of [[common sense]] social decisions.
* Practices in [[arbitration]] and [[law]], e.g. the claim that ethics itself is a matter of balancing "right versus right," i.e. putting priorities on two things that are both right, but which must be traded off carefully in each situation. Many consider{{who?}} this view to have potential to reform ethics as a practice, but it is not as widely held as the 'aesthetic' or 'common sense' views listed above.
* [[revealed preference|Observed choices]] made by ordinary people, without expert aid or advice, who [[vote]], [[buy]], and decide what is worth valuing. This is a major concern of [[sociology]], [[political science]], and [[economics]].
==Applied ethics==
Applied ethics is a discipline of philosophy that attempts to apply ethical theory to real-life situations. The lines of distinction between meta-ethics, normative ethics, and applied ethics are often blurry. For example, the issue of [[abortion]] can be seen as an applied ethical topic since it involves a specific type of controversial behaviour. But it can also depend on more general normative principles, such as possible rights of [[self-rule]] and [[right to life]], principles which are often litmus tests for determining the morality of that procedure. The issue also rests on meta-ethical issues such as, "where do rights come from?" and "what kind of beings have rights?"
Another concept which blurs ethics is [[moral luck]]. A drunk driver may safely reach home without injuring anyone, or he might accidentally kill a child who runs out into the street while he is driving home. The action of driving while drunk is usually seen as equally wrong in each case, but its dependence on chance affects the degree to which the driver is held responsible.
===Specific questions===
Applied ethics is used in determining public policy. For example, the following would be questions of applied ethics: "Is getting an [[abortion]] immoral?" "Is [[euthanasia]] immoral?" "Is [[affirmative action]] right or wrong?" "What are [[human rights]], and how do we determine them?" and "Do animals have rights as well?"
A more specific question could be: "If someone else can make better out of his/her life than I can, is it then moral to sacrifice myself for them if needed?" Without these questions there is no clear fulcrum on which to balance [[law]], [[politics]], and the practice of [[arbitration]] — in fact, no common assumptions of all participants—so the ability to formulate the questions are prior to rights balancing. But not all questions studied in applied ethics concern public policy. For example, making ethical judgments regarding questions such as, "Is [[lying]] always wrong?" and, "If not, when is it permissible?" is prior to any etiquette.
Often, questions of applied ethics take legal or political form before they are interpreted in frameworks of [[normative ethics]]. The [[UN Declaration of Universal Human Rights]] of 1948 and the [[Global Green Charter]] of 2001 are two such examples.
===Ethics in politics and economics===
Ethics has been applied to [[economics]], [[politics]] and [[political science]], leading to several distinct and unrelated fields of applied ethics, including [[business ethics]], [[binary economics]] and [[Marxism]]. American corporate scandals such as the [[Enron scandal]] and [[Global Crossing]] are illustrative of the interplay between ethics and business. Ethical inquiries into the fraud perpetrated by corporate senior executive officers (e.g., Enron's [[Kenneth Lay]]) are a growing trend and the situational ethics of employees, no matter how junior, who follow their unreasonable and/or illegal directives has also come to the fore. It has been argued, based on the legal obligation of corporate executives to maximise shareholder value and the fact that organisations comprise multiple individuals and agendas, that ethical constraints do not apply to corporations.{{Fact|date=August 2007}}
Ethics has been applied to family structure, sexuality, and how society views the roles of individuals; leading to several distinct and unrelated fields of applied ethics, including [[feminism]]. Ethics has been applied to [[war]], particularly to the [[just war|justification of engaging in war]], leading to positions such as [[pacifism]], [[militarism]] and [[nonviolence]]. [[Bernard Crick]] in 1982 offered a socially-centred view, that [[politics]] was the only applied ethics, that it was how cases were really resolved, and that "[[political virtues]]" were in fact necessary in all matters where human morality and interests were destined to clash. The need to redefine and align politics away from ideology and towards [[dispute resolution]] was a motive for Crick's list of political virtues.
===Environmental ethics===
Ethics has been applied to analyse human use of Earth's limited resources. This has led to the study of environmental ethics and [[social ecology]]. A growing trend has been to combine the study of both ecology and economics to help provide a framework for analysing [[sustainability]] in environmental use. This has led to the theories of [[ecological footprint]] and [[bioregional autonomy]]. Political and social movements based on such ideas include [[eco-feminism]], [[eco-anarchism]], [[deep ecology]], the [[green movement]], and ideas about their possible integration into [[Gaia philosophy]].
===Ethics in the professions===
There are several sub-branches of applied ethics examining the ethical problems of different professions, such as [[business ethics]], [[medical ethics]], [[journalism ethics]], [[engineering ethics]], [[museum ethics]] and [[legal ethics]], while [[technology assessment]] and [[environmental assessment]] study the effects and implications of new technologies or projects on nature and society.
Each branch characterizes common issues and problems that arise in the [[ethical code]]s of the professions, and defines their common responsibility to the public, e.g. to preserve its natural capital, or to obey some social expectations of honest dealings and disclosure.
====Ethics in health care====
One of the major areas where ethicists practice is in the field of [[health care]]. This includes [[medicine]], [[nursing ethics|nursing]], [[pharmacy]], [[genetics]], and other [[allied health professions]]. Example issues are [[euthanasia]], [[animal testing]], [[abortion]], [[medical research]], [[vaccine trials]], [[stem cell research]], [[informed consent]], [[truth|truth telling]], [[human rights|patient rights]] and [[autonomy]], [[rationing]] of health care (such as [[triage]]).
====Ethics in psychology====
By the [[1960s]] there was increased interest in [[moral reasoning]]. [[Psychology|Psychologists]] such as [[Lawrence Kohlberg]] developed theories which are based on the idea that moral behavior is made possible by moral reasoning. Their theories subdivided moral reasoning into so-called stages, which refer to the set of principles or methods that a person uses for ethical judgment. The first and most famous theory of this type was [[Kohlberg's stages of moral development|Kohlberg's theory of moral development]].
[[Carol Gilligan]], a student of Kohlberg's, argued that women tend to develop through a different set of stages from men. Her studies inspired work on an [[ethic of care]], which particularly defines itself against [[John Rawls|Rawlsian]]-type justice- and contract-based approaches.
Another group of influential psychological theories with ethical implications is the [[humanistic psychology]] movement. One of the most famous humanistic theories is [[Abraham Maslow|Abraham Maslow's]] [[Maslow's hierarchy of needs|hierarchy of needs]]. Maslow argued that the highest human need is [[self-actualization]], which can be described as fulfilling one's potential, and trying to fix what is wrong in the world. [[Carl Rogers|Carl Rogers's]] work was based on similar assumptions. He thought that in order to be a 'fully functioning person', one has to be creative and accept one's own feelings and needs. He also emphasized the value of self-actualization. A similar theory was proposed by [[Fritz Perls]], who assumed that taking responsibility of one's own life is an important value.
[[R.D. Laing]] developed a broad range of thought on [[interpersonal psychology]]. This deals with interactions between people, which he considered important, for an ethical action always occurs between one person and another. In books such as The Politics of Experience, he dealt with issues concerning how we should relate to persons labeled by the psychiatric establishment as "[[schizophrenic]]". He came to be seen as a champion for the rights of those considered mentally ill. He spoke out against (and wrote about) practices of [[psychiatrists]] which he considered inhumane or barbaric, such as [[Electro convulsive therapy|electric shock treatment]]. Like [[Wittgenstein]], he was frequently concerned with clarifying the use of language in the field — for example, he suggested that the effects of [[psychiatric drugs]] (some of which are very deleterious, such as [[tardive dyskinesia]]) be called just that: "effects", and not be referred to by the preferred euphemisms of the drug companies, who prefer to call them "side effects". Laing also did work in establishing true asylums as places of refuge for those who feel disturbed and want a safe place to go through whatever it is they want to explore in themselves, and with others.
A third group of psychological [[theories]] that have implications for the nature of ethics are based on [[evolutionary psychology]]. These theories are based on the assumption that the behavior that ethics prescribe can sometimes be seen as an evolutionary adaptation. For instance, [[altruism]] towards members of one's own [[family]] promotes one's [[inclusive fitness]].
On the other side of the evolutionary fence, [[Phil Roberts, Jr.]] has offered a view in which [[morality]], and particularly the capacity for [[guilt]], is viewed as a maladaptive byproduct of the [[evolution]] of [[rationality]]:
"Guilt is a maladaptive manifestation of our need to justify our existence, in this case by conforming to a shared subconscious theory of rationality in which 'being rational' is simply a matter of 'being objective', as exemplified in the moral maxim, 'Love (intrinsically value) your neighbor as you love (intrinsically value) yourself'. Although none of us can actually measure up to this standard, we nonetheless come to experience feelings of worthlessness (guilt) along with a corresponding reduction in the will to survive (depression) when we deviate from the standard to an unreasonable degree. In other words, the capacity to experience guilt (having a conscience) is a part of the price we humans have had to pay for having become a little too objective for our own good." [http://www.rationology.net]
===Legal ethics===
Ethics has been applied to [[criminology]] leading to the field of [[criminal justice]].
==See also==
*[[Empathy]]
*[[Ethicism]]
* [[Moral absolutism]]
** [[Divine command theory|Divine command ethics]]
** [[Universal prescriptivism]]
* The ''prima facie'' ethics of [[W. D. Ross]]
* [[Ethical relativism]]
** [[Ethical subjectivism]]
* [[Moral nihilism]]
* [[Ethical skepticism]]
* [[Global ethics]]
* [[Altruism (ethical doctrine)]]
** [[Altruism in animals]]
* [[Ethical egoism]]
** [[Objectivist ethics]]
* [[Social contract]]s
* [[Ethics and evolutionary psychology|Evolutionary ethics]]
* [[Human rights]]
* [[Is-ought problem]]
* [[List of ethicists]]
* [[List of ethics topics]]
* [[Naturalistic fallacy]]
* [[Perfection#Ethics|Moral perfection]]
* [[Ethic of reciprocity|The Golden Rule]]
* [[Principlism]]
==Further reading==
* The [http://www.ucl.ac.uk/philosophy/LPSG/ London Philosophy Study Guide] offers many suggestions on what to read, depending on the student's familiarity with the subject: [http://www.ucl.ac.uk/philosophy/LPSG/Ethics.htm Ethics]
* {{cite web| authorlink = Stephen Perle | last = Perle| first = Stephen| url = http://www.chiroweb.com/archives/22/06/16.html | title = Morality and Ethics: An Introduction | date = [[March 11]] [[2004]] | accessdate = 2007-02-13}}, Butchvarov, Panayot. Skepticism in Ethics (1989).
* [[Dietrich Bonhoeffer]]'s book ''Ethics'', discusses an individual's ethical responsibility in the face of evil.
== External links ==
* [http://www.galilean-library.org/int11.html An Introduction to Ethics] by Paul Newall, aimed at beginners.
* [[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]]:
** [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-ancient/ Ancient Ethics]
** [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-environmental/ Environmental Ethics]
** [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-ethics/ Feminist Ethics]
** [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/natural-law-ethics/ Natural Law Tradition in Ethics]
** [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-virtue/ Virtue Ethics]
* [http://www.ditext.com/broad/ftet/ftet.html C. D. Broad, ''Five Types of Ethical Theory'' (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co., 1930).]
* [http://www.ditext.com/cornman/corn6.html James Cornman, "Chapter Six: The Problem of Justifying an Ethical Standard,"] in Philosophical Problems and Arguments — An Introduction, 3d ed., Indianapolis: Hackett, 1982.
* [http://www.ditext.com/frankena/ethics.html William Frankena, ''Ethics'', 2d ed., 1973.]
* [http://www.ditext.com/ross/right.html W. D. Ross, ''The Right and the Good'' (1930)]
[[Category: General Reference]]
==Meta-ethics==
There are two main strands of thought, '[[moral relativism|non-realism]]' and '[[moral objectivism|realism]],' that attempt to explain what ethical values and claims are actually about.
'Non-realism' suggests moral values are creations, dependent on people's feelings and goals regarding themselves and others ([[emotivism]] or [[prescriptivism]]) or on their belief systems ([[cultural relativism|cultural]] or individual relativism). Despite the name 'non-realist', such theories may see reality as important in shaping the human choice of ethical values. This could occur indirectly by, for example, the evolutionary or developmental shaping of human psychology, or directly through, for example, people assessing and debating the likely consequences of their actions.
Another strand of meta-ethical theory, called 'realism', holds that moral value is somehow an intrinsic property of the world and that ethical principles are simply discovered or intuited. Under this view, ethical values held by people can at best reflect an independent [[truth]] by which their validity must be judged. These theories may be derived from [[theology]] or [[Naturalism (philosophy)|naturalism]].
==Normative ethics==
Normative ethics is the study of ethical [[norm (philosophy)|norms]] - moral standards that tell us how to judge right from wrong, or good from bad, and how to live moral lives. This may involve articulating the character or good habits that we should acquire, the duties that we should follow, or the consequences of our actions on ourselves and others. These have traditionally been the three main approaches to normative ethics.
Normative ethicists who follow the first approach are often called [[virtue ethics|virtue ethicists]], and articulate the various virtues or good habits that should be acquired. [[Aristotle]] is a pioneer virtue ethicist.
Normative ethicists who follow the second approach are often called [[deontological ethics|deontological ethicists]]. [[Immanuel Kant]] set out a large framework for a deontological normative ethical theory.
Normative ethicists who follow the third approach are often called [[consequentialism|consequentialists]] or (specifically in regard to the theory of the greatest good for the greatest number) [[utilitarianism|utilitarian]]s; [[John Stuart Mill]] set out a large framework for a utilitarian normative ethics.
==Descriptive ethics==
Descriptive ethics is a [[value-free]] approach to ethics which examines ethics not from a top-down ''[[a priori]]'' perspective but rather [[revealed preference|observations of actual choices]] made by moral agents in practice. Some philosophers rely on descriptive ethics and choices made and unchallenged by a [[society]] or [[culture]] to derive categories, which typically vary by context. This can lead to [[situational ethics]] and [[situated ethics]]. These philosophers often view [[aesthetics]], [[etiquette]], and [[arbitration]] as more fundamental, percolating "bottom up" to imply the existence of, rather than explicitly prescribe, theories of value or of conduct. The study of descriptive ethics may include examinations of the following:
* [[Ethical code]]s applied by various groups. Some consider aesthetics itself the basis of ethics – and a personal [[moral core]] developed through art and storytelling as very influential in one's later ethical choices.
* Informal theories of [[etiquette]] which tend to be less rigorous and more situational. Some consider etiquette a simple negative ethics, i.e. where can one evade an uncomfortable truth without doing wrong? One notable advocate of this view is [[Judith Martin]] ("Miss Manners"). According to this view, ethics is more a summary of [[common sense]] social decisions.
* Practices in [[arbitration]] and [[law]], e.g. the claim that ethics itself is a matter of balancing "right versus right," i.e. putting priorities on two things that are both right, but which must be traded off carefully in each situation. Many consider{{who?}} this view to have potential to reform ethics as a practice, but it is not as widely held as the 'aesthetic' or 'common sense' views listed above.
* [[revealed preference|Observed choices]] made by ordinary people, without expert aid or advice, who [[vote]], [[buy]], and decide what is worth valuing. This is a major concern of [[sociology]], [[political science]], and [[economics]].
==Applied ethics==
Applied ethics is a discipline of philosophy that attempts to apply ethical theory to real-life situations. The lines of distinction between meta-ethics, normative ethics, and applied ethics are often blurry. For example, the issue of [[abortion]] can be seen as an applied ethical topic since it involves a specific type of controversial behaviour. But it can also depend on more general normative principles, such as possible rights of [[self-rule]] and [[right to life]], principles which are often litmus tests for determining the morality of that procedure. The issue also rests on meta-ethical issues such as, "where do rights come from?" and "what kind of beings have rights?"
Another concept which blurs ethics is [[moral luck]]. A drunk driver may safely reach home without injuring anyone, or he might accidentally kill a child who runs out into the street while he is driving home. The action of driving while drunk is usually seen as equally wrong in each case, but its dependence on chance affects the degree to which the driver is held responsible.
===Specific questions===
Applied ethics is used in determining public policy. For example, the following would be questions of applied ethics: "Is getting an [[abortion]] immoral?" "Is [[euthanasia]] immoral?" "Is [[affirmative action]] right or wrong?" "What are [[human rights]], and how do we determine them?" and "Do animals have rights as well?"
A more specific question could be: "If someone else can make better out of his/her life than I can, is it then moral to sacrifice myself for them if needed?" Without these questions there is no clear fulcrum on which to balance [[law]], [[politics]], and the practice of [[arbitration]] — in fact, no common assumptions of all participants—so the ability to formulate the questions are prior to rights balancing. But not all questions studied in applied ethics concern public policy. For example, making ethical judgments regarding questions such as, "Is [[lying]] always wrong?" and, "If not, when is it permissible?" is prior to any etiquette.
Often, questions of applied ethics take legal or political form before they are interpreted in frameworks of [[normative ethics]]. The [[UN Declaration of Universal Human Rights]] of 1948 and the [[Global Green Charter]] of 2001 are two such examples.
===Ethics in politics and economics===
Ethics has been applied to [[economics]], [[politics]] and [[political science]], leading to several distinct and unrelated fields of applied ethics, including [[business ethics]], [[binary economics]] and [[Marxism]]. American corporate scandals such as the [[Enron scandal]] and [[Global Crossing]] are illustrative of the interplay between ethics and business. Ethical inquiries into the fraud perpetrated by corporate senior executive officers (e.g., Enron's [[Kenneth Lay]]) are a growing trend and the situational ethics of employees, no matter how junior, who follow their unreasonable and/or illegal directives has also come to the fore. It has been argued, based on the legal obligation of corporate executives to maximise shareholder value and the fact that organisations comprise multiple individuals and agendas, that ethical constraints do not apply to corporations.{{Fact|date=August 2007}}
Ethics has been applied to family structure, sexuality, and how society views the roles of individuals; leading to several distinct and unrelated fields of applied ethics, including [[feminism]]. Ethics has been applied to [[war]], particularly to the [[just war|justification of engaging in war]], leading to positions such as [[pacifism]], [[militarism]] and [[nonviolence]]. [[Bernard Crick]] in 1982 offered a socially-centred view, that [[politics]] was the only applied ethics, that it was how cases were really resolved, and that "[[political virtues]]" were in fact necessary in all matters where human morality and interests were destined to clash. The need to redefine and align politics away from ideology and towards [[dispute resolution]] was a motive for Crick's list of political virtues.
===Environmental ethics===
Ethics has been applied to analyse human use of Earth's limited resources. This has led to the study of environmental ethics and [[social ecology]]. A growing trend has been to combine the study of both ecology and economics to help provide a framework for analysing [[sustainability]] in environmental use. This has led to the theories of [[ecological footprint]] and [[bioregional autonomy]]. Political and social movements based on such ideas include [[eco-feminism]], [[eco-anarchism]], [[deep ecology]], the [[green movement]], and ideas about their possible integration into [[Gaia philosophy]].
===Ethics in the professions===
There are several sub-branches of applied ethics examining the ethical problems of different professions, such as [[business ethics]], [[medical ethics]], [[journalism ethics]], [[engineering ethics]], [[museum ethics]] and [[legal ethics]], while [[technology assessment]] and [[environmental assessment]] study the effects and implications of new technologies or projects on nature and society.
Each branch characterizes common issues and problems that arise in the [[ethical code]]s of the professions, and defines their common responsibility to the public, e.g. to preserve its natural capital, or to obey some social expectations of honest dealings and disclosure.
====Ethics in health care====
One of the major areas where ethicists practice is in the field of [[health care]]. This includes [[medicine]], [[nursing ethics|nursing]], [[pharmacy]], [[genetics]], and other [[allied health professions]]. Example issues are [[euthanasia]], [[animal testing]], [[abortion]], [[medical research]], [[vaccine trials]], [[stem cell research]], [[informed consent]], [[truth|truth telling]], [[human rights|patient rights]] and [[autonomy]], [[rationing]] of health care (such as [[triage]]).
====Ethics in psychology====
By the [[1960s]] there was increased interest in [[moral reasoning]]. [[Psychology|Psychologists]] such as [[Lawrence Kohlberg]] developed theories which are based on the idea that moral behavior is made possible by moral reasoning. Their theories subdivided moral reasoning into so-called stages, which refer to the set of principles or methods that a person uses for ethical judgment. The first and most famous theory of this type was [[Kohlberg's stages of moral development|Kohlberg's theory of moral development]].
[[Carol Gilligan]], a student of Kohlberg's, argued that women tend to develop through a different set of stages from men. Her studies inspired work on an [[ethic of care]], which particularly defines itself against [[John Rawls|Rawlsian]]-type justice- and contract-based approaches.
Another group of influential psychological theories with ethical implications is the [[humanistic psychology]] movement. One of the most famous humanistic theories is [[Abraham Maslow|Abraham Maslow's]] [[Maslow's hierarchy of needs|hierarchy of needs]]. Maslow argued that the highest human need is [[self-actualization]], which can be described as fulfilling one's potential, and trying to fix what is wrong in the world. [[Carl Rogers|Carl Rogers's]] work was based on similar assumptions. He thought that in order to be a 'fully functioning person', one has to be creative and accept one's own feelings and needs. He also emphasized the value of self-actualization. A similar theory was proposed by [[Fritz Perls]], who assumed that taking responsibility of one's own life is an important value.
[[R.D. Laing]] developed a broad range of thought on [[interpersonal psychology]]. This deals with interactions between people, which he considered important, for an ethical action always occurs between one person and another. In books such as The Politics of Experience, he dealt with issues concerning how we should relate to persons labeled by the psychiatric establishment as "[[schizophrenic]]". He came to be seen as a champion for the rights of those considered mentally ill. He spoke out against (and wrote about) practices of [[psychiatrists]] which he considered inhumane or barbaric, such as [[Electro convulsive therapy|electric shock treatment]]. Like [[Wittgenstein]], he was frequently concerned with clarifying the use of language in the field — for example, he suggested that the effects of [[psychiatric drugs]] (some of which are very deleterious, such as [[tardive dyskinesia]]) be called just that: "effects", and not be referred to by the preferred euphemisms of the drug companies, who prefer to call them "side effects". Laing also did work in establishing true asylums as places of refuge for those who feel disturbed and want a safe place to go through whatever it is they want to explore in themselves, and with others.
A third group of psychological [[theories]] that have implications for the nature of ethics are based on [[evolutionary psychology]]. These theories are based on the assumption that the behavior that ethics prescribe can sometimes be seen as an evolutionary adaptation. For instance, [[altruism]] towards members of one's own [[family]] promotes one's [[inclusive fitness]].
On the other side of the evolutionary fence, [[Phil Roberts, Jr.]] has offered a view in which [[morality]], and particularly the capacity for [[guilt]], is viewed as a maladaptive byproduct of the [[evolution]] of [[rationality]]:
"Guilt is a maladaptive manifestation of our need to justify our existence, in this case by conforming to a shared subconscious theory of rationality in which 'being rational' is simply a matter of 'being objective', as exemplified in the moral maxim, 'Love (intrinsically value) your neighbor as you love (intrinsically value) yourself'. Although none of us can actually measure up to this standard, we nonetheless come to experience feelings of worthlessness (guilt) along with a corresponding reduction in the will to survive (depression) when we deviate from the standard to an unreasonable degree. In other words, the capacity to experience guilt (having a conscience) is a part of the price we humans have had to pay for having become a little too objective for our own good." [http://www.rationology.net]
===Legal ethics===
Ethics has been applied to [[criminology]] leading to the field of [[criminal justice]].
==See also==
*[[Empathy]]
*[[Ethicism]]
* [[Moral absolutism]]
** [[Divine command theory|Divine command ethics]]
** [[Universal prescriptivism]]
* The ''prima facie'' ethics of [[W. D. Ross]]
* [[Ethical relativism]]
** [[Ethical subjectivism]]
* [[Moral nihilism]]
* [[Ethical skepticism]]
* [[Global ethics]]
* [[Altruism (ethical doctrine)]]
** [[Altruism in animals]]
* [[Ethical egoism]]
** [[Objectivist ethics]]
* [[Social contract]]s
* [[Ethics and evolutionary psychology|Evolutionary ethics]]
* [[Human rights]]
* [[Is-ought problem]]
* [[List of ethicists]]
* [[List of ethics topics]]
* [[Naturalistic fallacy]]
* [[Perfection#Ethics|Moral perfection]]
* [[Ethic of reciprocity|The Golden Rule]]
* [[Principlism]]
==Further reading==
* The [http://www.ucl.ac.uk/philosophy/LPSG/ London Philosophy Study Guide] offers many suggestions on what to read, depending on the student's familiarity with the subject: [http://www.ucl.ac.uk/philosophy/LPSG/Ethics.htm Ethics]
* {{cite web| authorlink = Stephen Perle | last = Perle| first = Stephen| url = http://www.chiroweb.com/archives/22/06/16.html | title = Morality and Ethics: An Introduction | date = [[March 11]] [[2004]] | accessdate = 2007-02-13}}, Butchvarov, Panayot. Skepticism in Ethics (1989).
* [[Dietrich Bonhoeffer]]'s book ''Ethics'', discusses an individual's ethical responsibility in the face of evil.
== External links ==
* [http://www.galilean-library.org/int11.html An Introduction to Ethics] by Paul Newall, aimed at beginners.
* [[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy]]:
** [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-ancient/ Ancient Ethics]
** [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-environmental/ Environmental Ethics]
** [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-ethics/ Feminist Ethics]
** [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/natural-law-ethics/ Natural Law Tradition in Ethics]
** [http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-virtue/ Virtue Ethics]
* [http://www.ditext.com/broad/ftet/ftet.html C. D. Broad, ''Five Types of Ethical Theory'' (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co., 1930).]
* [http://www.ditext.com/cornman/corn6.html James Cornman, "Chapter Six: The Problem of Justifying an Ethical Standard,"] in Philosophical Problems and Arguments — An Introduction, 3d ed., Indianapolis: Hackett, 1982.
* [http://www.ditext.com/frankena/ethics.html William Frankena, ''Ethics'', 2d ed., 1973.]
* [http://www.ditext.com/ross/right.html W. D. Ross, ''The Right and the Good'' (1930)]
[[Category: General Reference]]
