− | Tom: Your three levels might be [[interpreted]] "that you know" is on a [[physical]] level; "to know that you know" is on an [[intellectual]] level, and "to know that you know that you know" is on a [[spiritual]] level. I assume it's our [[Adjuster]] who knows. As I read in [http://www.amazon.com/Conversations-God-Uncommon-Dialogue-Book/dp/0399142789 Conversations With God], we're not here to learn; we're here to re-member. Our [[Adjusters]] know all, so when we're one with our Adjusters we know that we know that we know. Does that make any sense? | + | Tom: Your three levels might be [[interpreted]] "that you know" is on a [[physical]] level; "to know that you know" is on an [[intellectual]] level, and "to know that you know that you know" is on a [[spiritual]] level. I assume it's our [[Adjuster]] who knows. As I read in [https://www.amazon.com/Conversations-God-Uncommon-Dialogue-Book/dp/0399142789 Conversations With God], we're not here to learn; we're here to re-member. Our [[Adjusters]] know all, so when we're one with our Adjusters we know that we know that we know. Does that make any sense? |
| Machiventa: I don't know! Setting [[humor]] aside, you have [[illustrated]] a profound [[principle]], spiritual [[dynamics]] within the human [[personality]]. All that is requested of you from the [[divine]] is but one thing, and that is for you to [[become]] [[perfect]] as the Father of all is perfect. A simple statement, an eternal [[journey]]. The Father did not request this of you without already providing you with everything you need for that [[attainment]]. You have spoken of this provision, His divine Presence within you. Many a mind is [[confused]] when overvaluing the [[proof]] of the tangible to substantiate [[truth]], and it is a difficult [[perspective]], for it comes from the position that you speak of, that knowing that you know and attempting to strip it back to simply knowing. In its [[sincerity]] it is an attempt to avoid [[subjectivity]], the interjection of a wishful orchestration toward a desired result or proof or [[demonstration]]. However it de-spiritizes the [[process]], for [[comprehension]] of a thing does not reveal [[insight]] or [[meaning]] without the understanding of the knower of that thing, that knowing that you know. | | Machiventa: I don't know! Setting [[humor]] aside, you have [[illustrated]] a profound [[principle]], spiritual [[dynamics]] within the human [[personality]]. All that is requested of you from the [[divine]] is but one thing, and that is for you to [[become]] [[perfect]] as the Father of all is perfect. A simple statement, an eternal [[journey]]. The Father did not request this of you without already providing you with everything you need for that [[attainment]]. You have spoken of this provision, His divine Presence within you. Many a mind is [[confused]] when overvaluing the [[proof]] of the tangible to substantiate [[truth]], and it is a difficult [[perspective]], for it comes from the position that you speak of, that knowing that you know and attempting to strip it back to simply knowing. In its [[sincerity]] it is an attempt to avoid [[subjectivity]], the interjection of a wishful orchestration toward a desired result or proof or [[demonstration]]. However it de-spiritizes the [[process]], for [[comprehension]] of a thing does not reveal [[insight]] or [[meaning]] without the understanding of the knower of that thing, that knowing that you know. |