Critiquing the Afterlife Experiments'' By Ray Hyman "The studies were methodologically defective in a number of important ways, not the least of which was that they were not double-blind." Schwartz and Hyman debated these points in the March 2003 issue of the ''Skeptical Enquirer''.[http://www.csicop.org/si/2003-05/follow-up-schwartz.html] ''Follow Up: How '''Not''' to Review Mediumship Research'' By Gary Schwartz The ''Skeptical Enquirer'' May 2003 [http://www.csicop.org/si/2003-05/follow-up-hyman.html] ''Hyman’s Reply to Schwartz’s | Critiquing the Afterlife Experiments'' By Ray Hyman "The studies were methodologically defective in a number of important ways, not the least of which was that they were not double-blind." Schwartz and Hyman debated these points in the March 2003 issue of the ''Skeptical Enquirer''.[http://www.csicop.org/si/2003-05/follow-up-schwartz.html] ''Follow Up: How '''Not''' to Review Mediumship Research'' By Gary Schwartz The ''Skeptical Enquirer'' May 2003 [http://www.csicop.org/si/2003-05/follow-up-hyman.html] ''Hyman’s Reply to Schwartz’s |