Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | [[File:lighterstill.jpg]] | + | [[File:lighterstill.jpg]][[File:Superstition13.jpg|right|frame]] |
| | | |
| ==Etymology== | | ==Etymology== |
− | [http://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=English#ca._1100-1500_.09THE_MIDDLE_ENGLISH_PERIOD Middle English] supersticion, from Anglo-French, from [[Latin]] superstition-, superstitio, from superstit-, superstes standing over (as [[witness]] or [[survivor]]), from super- + stare to stand | + | [https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=English#ca._1100-1500_.09THE_MIDDLE_ENGLISH_PERIOD Middle English] supersticion, from Anglo-French, from [[Latin]] superstition-, superstitio, from superstit-, superstes standing over (as [[witness]] or [[survivor]]), from super- + stare to stand |
− | *Date: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/13th_Century 13th century] | + | *Date: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/13th_Century 13th century] |
| ==Definitions== | | ==Definitions== |
| *1 a : a [[belief]] or [[practice]] resulting from ignorance, [[fear]] of the [[unknown]], [[trust]] in [[magic]] or [[chance]], or a false conception of [[causation]] | | *1 a : a [[belief]] or [[practice]] resulting from ignorance, [[fear]] of the [[unknown]], [[trust]] in [[magic]] or [[chance]], or a false conception of [[causation]] |
| :b : an irrational abject [[attitude]] of [[mind]] toward the [[supernatural]], [[nature]], or [[God]] resulting from superstition | | :b : an irrational abject [[attitude]] of [[mind]] toward the [[supernatural]], [[nature]], or [[God]] resulting from superstition |
| *2 : a notion maintained despite [[evidence]] to the contrary | | *2 : a notion maintained despite [[evidence]] to the contrary |
| + | |
| + | ---- |
| + | |
| + | <center>For lessons on the [[topic]] of '''''Superstition''''', follow [https://nordan.daynal.org/wiki/index.php?title=Category:Superstition '''''this link'''''].</center> |
| + | |
| ==Description== | | ==Description== |
− | '''Superstition''' is a credulous [[belief]] or notion, not based on [[reason]], [[knowledge]], or [[experience]]. The [[word]] is often used pejoratively to refer to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folk_belief folk beliefs] deemed [[irrational]]. This leads to some superstitions being called "old wives' tales". It is also commonly applied to [[beliefs]] and [[practices]] surrounding [[luck]], [[prophecy]] and spiritual beings, particularly the irrational [[belief]] that future events can be influenced or foretold by specific unrelated prior [[events]]. | + | '''Superstition''' is a credulous [[belief]] or notion, not based on [[reason]], [[knowledge]], or [[experience]]. The [[word]] is often used pejoratively to refer to [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Folk_belief folk beliefs] deemed [[irrational]]. This leads to some superstitions being called "old wives' tales". It is also commonly applied to [[beliefs]] and [[practices]] surrounding [[luck]], [[prophecy]] and spiritual beings, particularly the irrational [[belief]] that future events can be influenced or foretold by specific unrelated prior [[events]]. |
| | | |
− | The word is attested in the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1st_Century BC 1st century BC], notably in Cicero, Livy, Ovid, in the [[meaning]] of an unreasonable or excessive [[belief]] in [[fear]] or [[magic]], especially foreign or fantastical ideas. By the [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1st_Century 1st century AD], it came to refer to "religious [[awe]], sanctity; a religious [[rite]]" more generally.[2][3] | + | The word is attested in the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1st_Century BC 1st century BC], notably in Cicero, Livy, Ovid, in the [[meaning]] of an unreasonable or excessive [[belief]] in [[fear]] or [[magic]], especially foreign or fantastical ideas. By the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1st_Century 1st century AD], it came to refer to "religious [[awe]], sanctity; a religious [[rite]]" more generally.[2][3] |
| ==Superstition and folklore== | | ==Superstition and folklore== |
| To European medieval [[scholars]] the [[word]] was applied to any [[beliefs]] outside of or in opposition to [[Christianity]]; today it is applied to conceptions without [[foundation]] in, or in contravention of, [[scientific]] and [[logical]] [[knowledge]].[4] | | To European medieval [[scholars]] the [[word]] was applied to any [[beliefs]] outside of or in opposition to [[Christianity]]; today it is applied to conceptions without [[foundation]] in, or in contravention of, [[scientific]] and [[logical]] [[knowledge]].[4] |
Line 23: |
Line 28: |
| Some superstitions originated as religious [[practices]] that continued to be observed by people who no longer adhere to the [[religion]] that gave birth to the [[practice]]. Often the practices lost their [[original]] meaning in this [[process]]. In other cases, the practices are adapted to the current religion of the practicer. As an example, during the Christianizing of Europe, [[pagan]] symbols to ward off evil were replaced with the Christian cross. | | Some superstitions originated as religious [[practices]] that continued to be observed by people who no longer adhere to the [[religion]] that gave birth to the [[practice]]. Often the practices lost their [[original]] meaning in this [[process]]. In other cases, the practices are adapted to the current religion of the practicer. As an example, during the Christianizing of Europe, [[pagan]] symbols to ward off evil were replaced with the Christian cross. |
| ==Superstition and psychology== | | ==Superstition and psychology== |
− | In 1948, behavioural psychologist [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B.F._Skinner B.F. Skinner] published an article in the ''Journal of Experimental Psychology'', in which he described his pigeons exhibiting what appeared to be superstitious [[behaviour]]. One pigeon was making turns in its cage, another would swing its head in a [[pendulum]] [[motion]], while others also displayed a variety of other behaviours. Because these behaviours were all done ritualistically in an attempt to receive food from a dispenser, even though the dispenser had already been programmed to release food at set time intervals regardless of the pigeons' actions, Skinner believed that the pigeons were trying to [[influence]] their feeding schedule by [[performing]] these actions. He then extended this as a proposition regarding the nature of superstitious behaviour in humans.[5] | + | In 1948, behavioural psychologist [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B.F._Skinner B.F. Skinner] published an article in the ''Journal of Experimental Psychology'', in which he described his pigeons exhibiting what appeared to be superstitious [[behaviour]]. One pigeon was making turns in its cage, another would swing its head in a [[pendulum]] [[motion]], while others also displayed a variety of other behaviours. Because these behaviours were all done ritualistically in an attempt to receive food from a dispenser, even though the dispenser had already been programmed to release food at set time intervals regardless of the pigeons' actions, Skinner believed that the pigeons were trying to [[influence]] their feeding schedule by [[performing]] these actions. He then extended this as a proposition regarding the nature of superstitious behaviour in humans.[5] |
| | | |
| Skinner's theory regarding superstition being the [[nature]] of the pigeons' behaviour has been challenged by other psychologists such as Staddon and Simmelhag, who theorised an alternative explanation for the pigeons' behaviour.[6] | | Skinner's theory regarding superstition being the [[nature]] of the pigeons' behaviour has been challenged by other psychologists such as Staddon and Simmelhag, who theorised an alternative explanation for the pigeons' behaviour.[6] |