Changes

From Nordan Symposia
Jump to navigationJump to search
776 bytes removed ,  01:07, 24 March 2009
no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  +
[[Image:lighterstill.jpg]][[Image:Indian_Philosophy.jpg|right|frame]]
 +
 
The term ''' Indian philosophy''' may refer to any of several traditions of philosophical thought that originated in [[Indian subcontinent|India]].
 
The term ''' Indian philosophy''' may refer to any of several traditions of philosophical thought that originated in [[Indian subcontinent|India]].
   Line 5: Line 7:  
"Indian philosophy denotes the philosophical speculations of all Indian thinkers, ancient or modern, Hindus or non-Hindus, theists or atheists....  
 
"Indian philosophy denotes the philosophical speculations of all Indian thinkers, ancient or modern, Hindus or non-Hindus, theists or atheists....  
   −
Indian philosophy is marked... by a striking breadth of outlook which only testifies to its unflinching devotion to the search for truth. Though there were many different schools and their views differed sometimes vary widely, yet each school took care to learn the views of all the others and did not come to any conclusions before considering thoroughly what others had to say and how their points could be met.... If the openness of mind — the willingness to listen to what others have to say — has been one of the chief causes of the wealth and greatness of Indian philosophy in the past, it has a definite moral for the future." Chatterjee and Datta, pp. 3 & 4.
+
Indian philosophy is marked... by a striking breadth of outlook which only testifies to its unflinching devotion to the search for truth. Though there were many different schools and their views differed sometimes vary widely, yet each school took care to learn the views of all the others and did not come to any conclusions before considering thoroughly what others had to say and how their points could be met.... If the openness of mind — the willingness to listen to what others have to say; has been one of the chief causes of the wealth and greatness of Indian philosophy in the past, it has a definite moral for the future."  
   −
The Sanskrit term for "philosopher" is ''IAST|dārśanika'', one who is familiar with the systems of philosophy. p. 497.  
+
The Sanskrit term for "philosopher" is ''dārśanika'', one who is familiar with the systems of philosophy.  
    
==Common themes==
 
==Common themes==
Indian thinkers viewed philosophy as a practical necessity that needed to be cultivated in order to understand how life can best be led.  It became a custom for Indian writers to explain at the beginning of philosophical works how it serves human ends ({{IAST|puruṣārtha}}).<ref>Chatterjee and Datta, p.12.
+
Indian thinkers viewed philosophy as a practical necessity that needed to be cultivated in order to understand how life can best be led.  It became a custom for Indian writers to explain at the beginning of philosophical works how it serves human ends (puruṣārtha).
    
The idea of, translated as "righteousness" or "the cosmic and social order" by Gavin Flood, Flood, pp. 45, 47. plays a pervasive role, as Chatterjee and Datta explain:  
 
The idea of, translated as "righteousness" or "the cosmic and social order" by Gavin Flood, Flood, pp. 45, 47. plays a pervasive role, as Chatterjee and Datta explain:  
Line 17: Line 19:     
==Periods==  
 
==Periods==  
Ancient Indian philosophy has been divided into broad divisions:<ref>''Periods of Indian Thought'', in  Radhakrishnan (1929)</ref><ref>Radhakrishnan and Moore, pp. xviii&ndash;xxi.</ref>
+
Ancient Indian philosophy has been divided into broad divisions:
 +
 
 
# The Vedic Period (1500 [[BCE]] &ndash; 600 BCE)
 
# The Vedic Period (1500 [[BCE]] &ndash; 600 BCE)
 
# The Epic period (600 BCE &ndash; 200 [[AD]])
 
# The Epic period (600 BCE &ndash; 200 [[AD]])
Line 23: Line 26:  
# The Scholastic Period (from the Sutra Period to the 17th century [[AD]])
 
# The Scholastic Period (from the Sutra Period to the 17th century [[AD]])
   −
The [[Sutra]] Period marks the definite beginning of systematic philosophical thinking.<ref>Chatterjee and Datta, p. 10.</ref> A sutra-work consists of a collection of brief statements, aphorisms, or problems, with answers, objections, and possible replies.  The [[Brahma Sutras|''Brahma-sūtra'']] of {{IAST|Bādarāyaṇa}}, for example, sums up and systematizes the philosophical teachings of various Vedic works, chiefly the Upanishads, and also mention and answer of both actual and possible objections to those views.  It is the first ''systematic'' treatise on the Vedanta literature.<ref>Chatterjee and Datta, p. 10.</ref> Similarly we have for the Mimamsa the sutras of Jaimini, for the Nyaya the sutras of Gotama, for the Vaisheshika the sutras of Kanada, and for the Yoga the sutras of Patanjali.   
+
The [[Sutra]] Period marks the definite beginning of systematic philosophical thinking.  A sutra-work consists of a collection of brief statements, aphorisms, or problems, with answers, objections, and possible replies.  The [[Brahma Sutras|''Brahma-sūtra'']] of Bādarāyaṇa, for example, sums up and systematizes the philosophical teachings of various Vedic works, chiefly the Upanishads, and also mention and answer of both actual and possible objections to those views.  It is the first ''systematic'' treatise on the Vedanta literature. Similarly we have for the Mimamsa the sutras of Jaimini, for the Nyaya the sutras of Gotama, for the Vaisheshika the sutras of Kanada, and for the Yoga the sutras of Patanjali.   
   −
Because the sutra form is by nature brief, their meanings were not always clear.  During the Scholastic Period this gave rise for interpretive commentaries (''{{IAST|bhāṣyas}}''), which play a major role in philosophical literature.  In some cases, different authors wrote major commentaries on the same sutra-work, but with very different interpretations reflecting their own philosophical positions.<ref>Chatterjee and Datta, p. 11.</ref> In time, commentaries arose upon commentaries, and additional independent works were written in defense of particular views.
+
Because the sutra form is by nature brief, their meanings were not always clear.  During the Scholastic Period this gave rise for interpretive commentaries (bhāṣyas), which play a major role in philosophical literature.  In some cases, different authors wrote major commentaries on the same sutra-work, but with very different interpretations reflecting their own philosophical positions.  In time, commentaries arose upon commentaries, and additional independent works were written in defense of particular views.
    
==Schools==
 
==Schools==
   −
Classical Indian philosophy can be roughly categorised into "orthodox" (astika) schools of [[Hindu philosophy]], and "heterodox" (nāstika) schools that do not accept the authorities of the [[Vedas]].<ref>Chatterjee and Datta, p. 5.</ref> 
+
Classical Indian philosophy can be roughly categorised into "orthodox" (astika) schools of [[Hindu philosophy]], and "heterodox" (nāstika) schools that do not accept the authorities of the [[Vedas]].
 
   
===Orthodox Schools (Astika)===
 
===Orthodox Schools (Astika)===
   −
Many [[Hinduism|Hindu]] intellectual traditions were codified during the medieval period of Brahmanic-Sanskritic scholasticism into a standard list of six orthodox ([[Nastika|astika]]) schools ([[darshana]]s), the "Six Philosophies" (''{{IAST|ṣad-darśana}}''), all of which cite [[Vedas|Vedic]] authority as their source:<ref>Flood, op. cit., p. 231&ndash;232.</ref><ref>Chatterjee and Datta, p. 5.</ref><ref>Michaels, p. 264.</ref>
+
Many [[Hinduism|Hindu]] intellectual traditions were codified during the medieval period of Brahmanic-Sanskritic scholasticism into a standard list of six orthodox ([[Nastika|astika]]) schools ([[darshana]]s), the "Six Philosophies" (''ṣad-darśana''), all of which cite [[Vedas|Vedic]] authority as their source:
    
*[[Nyaya]], the school of logic  
 
*[[Nyaya]], the school of logic  
Line 44: Line 46:  
These are often coupled into three groups for both historical and conceptual reasons: Nyaya-Vaishesika, Samkhya-Yoga, and Mimamsa-Vedanta.
 
These are often coupled into three groups for both historical and conceptual reasons: Nyaya-Vaishesika, Samkhya-Yoga, and Mimamsa-Vedanta.
   −
The six systems mentioned here are not the only orthodox systems, they are the chief ones, and there are other orthodox schools such as the "Grammarian" school.<ref>Chatterjee and Datta, p. 5.</ref>
+
The six systems mentioned here are not the only orthodox systems, they are the chief ones, and there are other orthodox schools such as the "Grammarian" school.
    
The Vedanta school is further divided into six sub-schools: [[Advaita]] ([[monism]]/[[nondualism]]), [[Visishtadvaita]] (monism of the qualified whole), [[Dvaita]] ([[dualism]]), [[Dvaitadvaita]] (dualism-nondualism), Suddhadvaita, and [[Achintya Bheda Abheda]] schools.
 
The Vedanta school is further divided into six sub-schools: [[Advaita]] ([[monism]]/[[nondualism]]), [[Visishtadvaita]] (monism of the qualified whole), [[Dvaita]] ([[dualism]]), [[Dvaitadvaita]] (dualism-nondualism), Suddhadvaita, and [[Achintya Bheda Abheda]] schools.
Line 52: Line 54:  
===Heterodox schools ([[Nastika]])===
 
===Heterodox schools ([[Nastika]])===
   −
Schools that do not accept the authority of the Vedas are by definition unorthodox (nastika) systems.<ref>Chatterjee and Datta, p. 5.</ref>
+
Schools that do not accept the authority of the Vedas are by definition unorthodox (nastika) systems.
    
====Carvaka====
 
====Carvaka====
   −
Carvaka is characterized as a [[materialism|materialistic]] and [[atheistic]] school of thought.  While this branch of Indian philosophy is not considered to be part of the six orthodox schools of Hinduism, it is noteworthy as evidence of a [[atheism in Hinduism|materialistic movement]] within [[Hinduism]].<ref>Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan and Charles A. Moore. ''A Sourcebook in Indian Philosophy''. (Princeton University Press: 1957, Twelfth Princeton Paperback printing 1989) pp. 227&ndash;249. ISBN 0-691-01958-4.</ref>
+
Carvaka is characterized as a [[materialism|materialistic]] and [[atheistic]] school of thought.  While this branch of Indian philosophy is not considered to be part of the six orthodox schools of Hinduism, it is noteworthy as evidence of a [[atheism in Hinduism|materialistic movement]] within [[Hinduism]].
    
====Buddhist philosophy====
 
====Buddhist philosophy====
Line 68: Line 70:  
====Jain philosophy====
 
====Jain philosophy====
   −
Jaina philosophy, was founded by [[Mahavira]] (599&ndash;527 BCE). [[Anekantavada]] is a basic principle of Jainism positing that reality is perceived differently from different points of view, and that no single point of view is completely true. Jain doctrine states that only Kevalis, those who have infinite knowledge, can know the true answer, and that all others would only know a part of the answer. Anekantavada is related to the Western philosophical doctrine of [[Subjectivism]].
+
Jaina philosophy, was founded by [[Mahavira]] (599 - 527 BCE). [[Anekantavada]] is a basic principle of Jainism positing that reality is perceived differently from different points of view, and that no single point of view is completely true. Jain doctrine states that only Kevalis, those who have infinite knowledge, can know the true answer, and that all others would only know a part of the answer. Anekantavada is related to the Western philosophical doctrine of [[Subjectivism]].
    
==Political philosophy==
 
==Political philosophy==
 
The [[Arthashastra]], attributed to the [[Mauryan]] minister [[Chanakya]], is one of the early Indian texts devoted to [[political philosophy]]. It is dated to 4th century BCE and discusses ideas of statecraft and economic policy.
 
The [[Arthashastra]], attributed to the [[Mauryan]] minister [[Chanakya]], is one of the early Indian texts devoted to [[political philosophy]]. It is dated to 4th century BCE and discusses ideas of statecraft and economic policy.
   −
The political philosophy most closely associated with India is the one of [[ahimsa]] (non-violence) and [[Satyagraha]], popularized by [[Mahatma Gandhi]] during the [[Indian independence movement|Indian struggle for independence]]. It was influenced by the Indian Dharmic philosophy (particularly  the [[Bhagvata Gita]]) and [[Jesus]], as well as, secular writings of authors such as  [[Leo Tolstoy]], [[Henry David Thoreau]] and [[John Ruskin]].<ref>Gandhi (1961) p. iii</ref> In turn it influenced the later movements for independence and civil rights led by [[Nelson Mandela]] and [[Martin Luther King, Jr.]].
+
The political philosophy most closely associated with India is the one of [[ahimsa]] (non-violence) and [[Satyagraha]], popularized by [[Mahatma Gandhi]] during the [[Indian independence movement|Indian struggle for independence]]. It was influenced by the Indian Dharmic philosophy (particularly  the [[Bhagvad Gita]]) and [[Jesus]], as well as, secular writings of authors such as  [[Leo Tolstoy]], [[Henry David Thoreau]] and [[John Ruskin]]. In turn it influenced the later movements for independence and civil rights led by [[Nelson Mandela]] and [[Martin Luther King, Jr.]].
    
== See also ==
 
== See also ==
Line 81: Line 83:  
== External links ==  
 
== External links ==  
   −
* A recommended reading guide from the philosophy department of [[University College, London]]: [http://www.ucl.ac.uk/philosophy/LPSG/Indian.pdf London Philosophy Study Guide &mdash; Indian Philosophy]
+
* A recommended reading guide from the philosophy department of [[University College, London]]: [http://www.ucl.ac.uk/philosophy/LPSG/Indian.pdf London Philosophy Study Guide & Indian Philosophy]
       
[[Category: General Reference]]
 
[[Category: General Reference]]
 
[[Category: Indian Philosophy]]
 
[[Category: Indian Philosophy]]

Navigation menu